Wilner blows. But he is our only source for (dis) information, unfortunately.Look at Wilner hedging everything.
Wilner blows. But he is our only source for (dis) information, unfortunately.
Don’t think he has ever embraced CU’s move to the PAC. Can’t say I blame him.I generally like Wilner, but he has helped feed the media narrative that the search is a **** show. Now he is non-committal on a positive rumor because everything is tight-lipped? Huh?
no way that happens. The obvious best thing is not the P12 way.Oliver Luck Oliver Luck Oliver Luck Oliver Luck Oliver Luck Oliver Luck Oliver Luck
AHAHAHHAHAHHA I’ll laugh so hard that I’ll piss myself if this happens which of course means it will.Mark Kennedy to the P12??
I don’t know how this ends well. Wilmer is pretty in tune with what goes on in the PAC-12.
He know more than anyone else so I'm going to trust him. I'm guessing he's been "driving the narrative" because what have the presidents shown to prove us otherwise?Eh, he's been driving this "incompetent search" narrative for a while now, with nothing to base it on. Maybe he ends up being right, but he doesn't know much about the search at this point.
Thamel's Tweet is ****ty, though. Luck would have been a great hire. We'll see
But when it comes to this search, he doesn't know more than anyone else (no one seems to know anything). If you follow his comments over the last few weeks, he doesn't have any kind of actual information, he just hedges everything with "they could make a great hire, but the Presidents are also idiots so I wouldn't be surprised if it was a bad hire"He know more than anyone else so I'm going to trust him. I'm guessing he's been "driving the narrative" because what have the presidents shown to prove us otherwise?
Okay. I can see your point from WIlner's takes.But when it comes to this search, he doesn't know more than anyone else (no one seems to know anything). If you follow his comments over the last few weeks, he doesn't have any kind of actual information, he just hedges everything with "they could make a great hire, but the Presidents are also idiots so I wouldn't be surprised if it was a bad hire"
I have no idea. I tend to err on the side of optimism, but I'm probably in the minority on that when it comes to the Pac 12.Okay. I can see your point from WIlner's takes.
What's your personal opinion? Do you think the presidents make a good hire in the end? I would go 20% chance of a great hire. 40% chance of an okay hire. 40% chance of a colossal **** up.
I was going to say the same thing. With how close to the vest this search has been played and this scheduled announcement, I feel like we are either going to be elated or depressedSurprise live reveal seems like a strange approach does it not? Why wouldn't they just have a normal press release and then bring him in like any normal announcement. Either they think they hit a home run, or have no idea what they are doing. I guess those aren't mutually exclusive.
My guess is it is Gene Smith. Some worry from that side that an announcement is coming on some unknown topic. Could be completely unrelated as well.