dply
Doble hoja
I came here to negrep people, but kept going through the pages waiting for something even better to negrep, and it never really happened. To get my fix I'll just start going up the page from here. Sorry, dply and others.
:lol:
I came here to negrep people, but kept going through the pages waiting for something even better to negrep, and it never really happened. To get my fix I'll just start going up the page from here. Sorry, dply and others.
They are if they started multiple years before being injured.
Caprioglio has been a 3 year starter before he tore his ACL last year
You are the definition of fan my friend. A true fanatic and CSewe could use a few more. You are delusional, but a true fan.
If I recall right OMFGasm works in the AD as a student. I'm thinking he is fed the company line over and over.
This is about the only thing CSU can do so I don't blame them. They need to build up their AD to have a chance at the bigger money later. The problem is that if it fails, and I don't see why it won't, they will be royally screwed. Not just the AD but the school too.
Coach Sparkles will have to have 3 years of really good football teams to peak the interest of the boosters or else that money will dry up. LE is a great coach but even with the great MBB that the Rams had last year left attendance something to be desired.
I like OMFGasm. Like Buffalo Brad said he is a true fan. I can't fault him for ignoring the negatives.
Problem for CSU is that if he has even one or two good seasons he will be out of there faster than the CSU fans can spell "minor bowl game." McElwain has been at Alabama and Mich State. He knows what big-time college football is and knows he isn't in it. If schools come calling with contracts higher than CSU makes from their media package he will be gone in a flash. On the other hand if he fails, which considering the talent level he has to work with is a distinct possibility, with no attendance and the donors bored again with failure they will be stuck with him because they won't have the money to buy him out and hire a new coach.
I can take a little delusion, but this guy is either outright ignorant or just yanking our chain. CSU swimming in cash? You have the lowest revenue AD in the Mountain West. Fact. You are in a conference with a media deal that Colorado alone in the Pac 12 will eclipse annually. Fact. You are paying new coaches, coaching search expenses, new AD staff, etc. BCS type salaries that CSU revenue simply CANNOT sustain without private donations. Why do you think no other schools in similar level revenue conferences aren't paying these types of salaries? Plus on top of all of this extravagant spending, you want a privately funded stadium that will cost in the neighborhood of a quarter of a billion dollars? Either CSU is going to pull the Boise State shooting for the moon scenario (statistically very unlikely), or crash and burn if all of that cash is spent and CSU is still relegated to a tier 2 level in college football (very likely). That fallout from the 2nd scenario will be fun as hell.
Exactly. I get why they're excited. I even get, on some level, why they're trying to do what they're trying to do. It will be pretty magnificent if they pull it off, and they have one major bargaining chip working in their favor - the potential of the Denver TV market. That being said, if it fails then there will be a crater where the CSU AD used to reside. Bridges will have been burned with donors, with the community, with the legislature.... and the department will be a wreak financially and will have to make some drastic cuts.
CSU is floating in cash. You guys don't know Tony Frank. The Athletic Budget has been increased
CSU is floating in cash. You guys don't know Tony Frank. The Athletic Budget has been increased
those are wonderfully general statements that don't discount a single thing we have said here. Please explain further or concede the point.CSU is floating in cash. You guys don't know Tony Frank. The Athletic Budget has been increased
CSU is floating in cash. You guys don't know Tony Frank. The Athletic Budget has been increased
CSU is floating in cash. You guys don't know Tony Frank. The Athletic Budget has been increased
those are wonderfully general statements that don't discount a single thing we have said here. Please explain further or concede the point.
Exactly. I get why they're excited. I even get, on some level, why they're trying to do what they're trying to do. It will be pretty magnificent if they pull it off, and they have one major bargaining chip working in their favor - the potential of the Denver TV market. That being said, if it fails then there will be a crater where the CSU AD used to reside. Bridges will have been burned with donors, with the community, with the legislature.... and the department will be a wreak financially and will have to make some drastic cuts.
They can't be bothered to go to Ft. Collins to watch them.
I said CSU, not the AD is swimming in cash. Some of that cash will be allocated to athletics as Tony Frank is increasing the athletic budget (obviously).Just spoke with my buddy whose family are 'moderate' donors to CSU. Told him that I was informed the CSU AD was swimming in cash, and he just started laughing
I said CSU, not the AD is swimming in cash. Some of that cash will be allocated to athletics as Tony Frank is increasing the athletic budget (obviously).
You guys' doomsday predictions of bankruptcy are as farfetched as you say mine are
Yeah, its a risk/reward scenario but the bankruptcy scenario is effing hilarious. The new stadium is going to increase revenue for the athletic department/university by several millions.Ohhh - so the AD is NOT swimming in cash - they are just getting an increased budget. Well that makes sense for covering the revenue streams - you certainly made it sound like the AD was swimming in cash.
OMFGasm - do you see any potential for failure here? If so, what will those consequences be?
So the school is heavily subsidizing the department. I can't WAIT to hear about it the next time CSU raises tuition. That aint gonna last.Yeah, its a risk/reward scenario but the bankruptcy scenario is effing hilarious. The new stadium is going to increase revenue for the athletic department/university by several millions.
If CSU can compile $520mil in a 5 year campaign for academics and roughly a billion in campus renovations, I don't think $ should be a problem.
If we win in Football, then it doesn't matter, the money problem will sort itself out. We already scrapping Russell for Nike. The $ in the AD is at an all time high
Yeah, its a risk/reward scenario but the bankruptcy scenario is effing hilarious. The new stadium is going to increase revenue for the athletic department/university by several millions.
If CSU can compile $520mil in a 5 year campaign for academics and roughly a billion in campus renovations, I don't think $ should be a problem.
If we win in Football, then it doesn't matter, the money problem will sort itself out. We already scrapping Russell for Nike. The $ in the AD is at an all time high
I'm not assuming anything. Ram Club donations are at an all time high, before we even played a game. New revenue from the stadium + Nike will bring in some nice revenue. Those are sustainable forms of revenue. Can you read?No one said bankrupt. You would just be in a lot of financial trouble. You are also assuming a losing program historically will start winning. You are also assuming that once you start winning people will start caring. You are also assuming the state won't make additional cuts to higher education which is something you, Captain Jack, and Tony Frank cannot do captain jack **** about.