Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Predictions for RMS

Gasm arguing about experience on the DL compared to CU is really really hilarious to me. How dumb can he be? Not to mention making "18 yo" arguments when he has previously listed several true frosh as contributors. Granted, one of those true frosh is unlikely to even get on the team :lol:
 
Watchlists
CU
Lombardi: Bakhtiari
Remington: Handler
Butkus: Rippy
Ray Guy: O'Neill

CSU
Lombardi: n/a
Remington: Richburg
Butkus: n/a
Ray Guy: Kontodiakos

So based on this Rippy>Barrett, Bakhtiari/Handler>Richburg, and CU's LB's>CSU and CU OL>CSU

Where is Barrett? I thought he was a sure fire 1st rounder, no hype?
 
Darth Snow said:
Gasm arguing about experience on the DL compared to CU is really really hilarious to me. How dumb can he be? Not to mention making "18 yo" arguments when he has previously listed several true frosh as contributors. Granted, one of those true frosh is unlikely to even get on the team :lol:
Click to expand...

Pretty sure I never mentioned any True freshmen as contributors.
 
sliderNcider said:
Watchlists
CU
Lombardi: Bakhtiari
Remington: Handler
Butkus: Rippy
Ray Guy: O'Neill

CSU
Lombardi: n/a
Remington: Richburg
Butkus: n/a
Ray Guy: Kontodiakos

So based on this Rippy>Barrett, Bakhtiari/Handler>Richburg, and CU's LB's>CSU and CU OL>CSU
Click to expand...

Don't forget Mackey watchlist for Gillmore or the RB one for Nwoke.

Good one
 
OMFGasm said:
Tonga-JuCo National champion
Tejay Brown, Zach Tiedgen and Curtis Wilson have played a lot the last 2-3 years. All easily have 100+each.

Only need one DT at a time.

If Shaq Walker can be anywhere near decent our DT situation will be fine, but in the end we won't have to rely on True Freshmen like CU will
Click to expand...

National. Champion.

I repeat, this guy won a JuCo Nattional Championship. That plus McSparkles 2, give CSU a total of 3. As a CU fan, I find this very troubling.
 
OMFGasm said:
Tonga-JuCo National champion
Tejay Brown, Zach Tiedgen and Curtis Wilson have played a lot the last 2-3 years. All easily have 100+each.

Only need one DT at a time.

If Shaq Walker can be anywhere near decent our DT situation will be fine, but in the end we won't have to rely on True Freshmen like CU will
Click to expand...

I didn't know Tonga had been cleared yet. I wouldn't count your chickens before they hatch.
 
OMFGasm said:
Vaunted OL that had several key players injured and not playing. Plus they weren't even real sacks, they called a sack if a player got within 5 feet of the QB.
Click to expand...

But wait, part of your argument for CSU's OL was that even the backups have a ton of experience since they got so much playing time last year when the starters went down. Seems like they got a lot of experience giving up sacks.

Having a bunch of returning players is great when they are good, but returning a bunch of bad players does not a good team make.
 
SINKRATZ said:
But wait, part of your argument for CSU's OL was that even the backups have a ton of experience since they got so much playing time last year when the starters went down. Seems like they got a lot of experience giving up sacks.

Having a bunch of returning players is great when they are good, but returning a bunch of bad players does not a good team make.
Click to expand...
So you're basing their talent off the spring game?

Seems like they performed pretty well last year in actual games

Derp
 
SINKRATZ said:
But wait, part of your argument for CSU's OL was that even the backups have a ton of experience since they got so much playing time last year when the starters went down. Seems like they got a lot of experience giving up sacks.

Having a bunch of returning players is great when they are good, but returning a bunch of bad players does not a good team make.
Click to expand...

Derp
 
141>50. We lost 141 games to injury in the 2 deep last year. So I guess our backups have more experience then your starters????? ???
 
OMFGasm said:
So you're basing their talent off the spring game?

Seems like they performed pretty well last year in actual games

Derp
Click to expand...

When did your OL starters go down, because I'm pretty sure you lost your final 8 games last year? Is that good to you?

Wait, Phil D is that you?
 
Let's review the Lammies 2011 season, shall we? They won against NM, the worst team in FBS ball, by 4 points. Ugh, I guess that's a good start. They beat FCs Northern Co. Yeah.. They beat Utah St in a game in which USU had far more yards but gave up 4 turn overs. Better to be lucky than good, I suppose. Then they proceeded to lose out with losses to powerhouses like San Jose St, UTEP, and the unstoppable UNLV.

09/03/11@ New MexicoW 14-102:5421,454
09/10/11Northern Colo.W 33-142:5625,367
09/17/11+ ColoradoL 14-283:1257,186
09/24/11@ Utah St.W 35-343:2022,599
10/01/11San Jose St.L 31-383:1327,683
10/15/118 Boise St.L 13-633:0330,027
10/22/11@ UTEPL 17-313:2131,797
10/29/11@ UNLVL 35-383:0021,289
11/12/11San Diego St.L 15-182:5416,811
11/19/11@ 14 TCUL 10-342:5534,094
11/26/11Air ForceL 21-452:5314,107
12/03/11WyomingL 19-223:0817,207
 
sliderNcider said:
141>50. We lost 141 games to injury in the 2 deep last year. So I guess our backups have more experience then your starters????? ???
Click to expand...

I actually don't recall what the exact number of starts lost to injury but CSU had the 5th most in the nation.

CU wasn't on the list.

Fluff fans need to lrn haw 2 raed
 
Scored 35 points for their season high, twice. 2 of 3 wins by 3 or less points. Only win by more than 3 points was against an FCS team.

:rofl:. Domination.
 
OMFGasm said:
I actually don't recall what the exact number of starts lost to injury but CSU had the 5th most in the nation.

CU wasn't on the list.

Fluff fans need to lrn haw 2 raed
Click to expand...

If you're going by Phil Steele, then the Buffs were 12th in the nation by whatever his calculation method is.
 
OMFGasm said:
Soon to be eclipsed by this season
Click to expand...

It's ok. The DT's you were talking up had offers from Oregon St, Kansas, and UCF. Our DT's had offers from Arizona, Georgia Tech, UCLA, Utah, Iowa State, Washington, Boise St, Nevada. And that's only Solis
 
sliderNcider said:
It's ok. The DT's you were talking up had offers from Oregon St, Kansas, and UCF. Our DT's had offers from Arizona, Georgia Tech, UCLA, Utah, Iowa State, Washington, Boise St, Nevada. And that's only Solis
Click to expand...

I hear all those 4* CU has gotten the last 5 years were pretty good.

That #16 class in the nation in 2008 should be looking pretty good right about now. With that class you guys should be a 10 win team this year.

Oh wait
 
OMFGasm said:
Soon to be eclipsed by this season
Click to expand...
Yup. and it is quite the talented group. I'm very excited to see what this class can do. Considering the 2008 class was a mega bust, the 2012 class has the chance to be the best class to come through CU in a decade. Which is actually an indictment of how bad we have been.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top