**** you. Where the **** did I say or imply this is my "biggest concern" you asshole? Sorry, but your post really pissed me off.I'm just glad that this is your biggest concern. You know, just so I do not get you wrong.
Last edited:
**** you. Where the **** did I say or imply this is my "biggest concern" you asshole? Sorry, but your post really pissed me off.I'm just glad that this is your biggest concern. You know, just so I do not get you wrong.
So, how'd that retirement thing work out?JoPa feathered his nest just before the **** hit the fan. :rolling_eyes:
This guy's positive rep is shot forever.
**** you. Where the **** did I say or imply this is my "biggest concern" you asshole? Sorry, but your post really pissed me off.
I'm not focused on it. Yeah, I've made one similar post before. But no one seems to even want to consider it. My point is that even the victims will be dragged through the mud by shrewd defense attornys because there will be scammers out there. This process is going to be very difficult for the victims because of it.You have now posted a couple different times on your concerns about people/victims possibly lying in this whole sordid situation. Sorry if that seems pretty stupid to me. Out of all the concerns to be had from this, you keep focusing on that stuff.
ummm. DBT. I'm with BB on this one. Your focus on this seems weird, and this explanation is strange.I'm not focused on it. Yeah, I've made one similar post before. But no one seems to even want to consider it. My point is that even the victims will be dragged through the mud by shrewd defense attornys because there will be scammers out there. This process is going to be very difficult for the victims because of it.
I'm not focused on it. Yeah, I've made one similar post before. But no one seems to even want to consider it. My point is that even the victims will be dragged through the mud by shrewd defense attornys because there will be scammers out there. This process is going to be very difficult for the victims because of it.[/QUOTE]
This part is almost always true. With the amount of money that is going to be on the table there will be those who try, dishonestly, to get a piece of it. Because of them the legitimate victims will have their motives questioned be made to feel like the criminals, not Sandusky and those who enabled him.
Even without the fakes and frauds there will be those who will blame the victims for "destroying the reputation of their school and a fine man like JoePa." choosing to transfer their anger to the victims instead of where it belongs with the perpetrators of the evil.
This is similar in a way to those who blame the rape victim for dressing wrong or being in a place she shouldn't have been, in other words "asking for it." instead of putting the blame on the criminal who raped her.
ummm. DBT. I'm with BB on this one. Your focus on this seems weird, and this explanation is strange.
eh. now I'm being misunderstood. :lol:ummm. Darth. I'm with DBT on this one. BB's focus on accusing DBT of not having enough moral outrage because of a couple of posts seems weird... and unfair. But what do I know. I am just third party that was going to leave well enough alone until you decided to weigh in.
Weird in what way exactly?ummm. DBT. I'm with BB on this one. Your focus on this seems weird, and this explanation is strange.
YOU are being misunderstood? How do you think I feel?eh. now I'm being misunderstood. :lol:
It's weird in that it appears, to me, that you are very worried about the possibility of a person faking getting abused by Sandusky in order to get money. And that you are emphasizing that point. It's a weird point to emphasize.Weird in what way exactly?
I do not mean to emphasize it over the more important parts of the case. I just think its an interesting topic. What can I say about Sandusky, Paterno and PSU that hasn't already been said? After Sandusky is sentenced the civil suits will begin as well as, possibly, more criminal charges.It's weird in that it appears, to me, that you are very worried about the possibility of a person faking getting abused by Sandusky in order to get money. And that you are emphasizing that point. It's a weird point to emphasize.
The fact that you find the mere possibility an interesting topic, with no evidence that it has, is, or will happen, is also weird. But then again, this is allbuffs.I do not mean to emphasize it over the more important parts of the case. I just think its an interesting topic. What can I say about Sandusky, Paterno and PSU that hasn't already been said? After Sandusky is sentenced the civil suits will begin as well as, possibly, more criminal charges.
I think outside the box.The fact that you find the mere possibility an interesting topic, with no evidence that it has, is, or will happen, is also weird. But then again, this is allbuffs.
I broke the dam.
I broke the dam!
I Broke the dam!
This article by AP writer Tim Dahlberg was in my local Sunday paper. It's titled NCAA must gut Penn State's football program with massive penalties
http://bit.ly/Mwcs0q
The writer is correct. There is no way for Paterno's family to spin this to make JoePa look good. I also don't think this compares to CU's rape scandal. This compares to nothing that we know of in college football.
this article by ap writer tim dahlberg was in my local sunday paper. It's titled ncaa must gut penn state's football program with massive penalties
http://bit.ly/mwcs0q
the writer is correct. There is no way for paterno's family to spin this to make joepa look good. I also don't think this compares to mary keenan's perceived rape scandal. This compares to nothing that we know of in college football.
Shutting down the football program would salve some of society's moral outrage, but would it really change anything? The PSU administration knew just how ****ed they would be if Sandusky's deeds were exposed. That's why they covered it up. This was a moral failure on the part of those involved, not a moral hazard.
I have to disagree. If the PSU administration, especially JoPa, had dealt with JS as they should have after the first reported incident in 1998, they would have avoided this whole thing. Once it became public, other, previous victims may have come forward, but it would never have blown up and been such a black mark on what was a highly respected program.
The fact they allowed JS to use both the Second Mile and the football program and facilties so that he could pick out highly vulnerable kids to abuse is what is so insidious about the whole thing. The administration (again especially JoPa) is directly responsible for every kid that was violated after 1998.
Well said.I have to disagree. If the PSU administration, especially JoPa, had dealt with JS as they should have after the first reported incident in 1998, they would have avoided this whole thing. Once it became public, other, previous victims may have come forward, but it would never have blown up and been such a black mark on what was a highly respected program.
The fact they allowed JS to use both the Second Mile and the football program and facilties so that he could pick out highly vulnerable kids to abuse is what is so insidious about the whole thing. The administration (again especially JoPa) is directly responsible for every kid that was violated after 1998.
I have to disagree. If the PSU administration, especially JoPa, had dealt with JS as they should have after the first reported incident in 1998, they would have avoided this whole thing. Once it became public, other, previous victims may have come forward, but it would never have blown up and been such a black mark on what was a highly respected program.
The fact they allowed JS to use both the Second Mile and the football program and facilties so that he could pick out highly vulnerable kids to abuse is what is so insidious about the whole thing. The administration (again especially JoPa) is directly responsible for every kid that was violated after 1998.
But they will bring the hammer down on Cal-Tech!
Police are aware of three men who say they were abused in the 1970s or 1980s by former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky, CNN contributor Sara Ganim reports for the Harrisburg Patriot News.
The allegations are the first to involve claims of abuse by the coach before the 1990s. During Sandusky's child rape trial, his defense argued that it is rare for someone to suddenly become a pedophile in their later years.