What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Sir Larry Scott.. (P12 considering buying out Larry Scott)

Lol.

PaHI picks the weirdest ****ing hills to die on. I like to imagine he'd be so much happier if he could challenge his own preconceived notions and admit he might be wrong once in a while. But if he were capable of that, it would drastically reduce some of the entertainment value of Allbuffs.

The entertainment value of AllBuffs is immense, with or without yours truly. Just get a box of popcorn and go to the Politics board - it's an endless source of mirth and merriment....
 
The deal is with ESPN for rights to all the BYU home games with a minimum of 4 having to be picked up (networks + also on the ESPN app). BYUTV is only part of the deal for ESPN letting them broadcast 1 game a year because BYU wanted that. At least 3 of those ESPN games have to be on ABC/ESPN/ESPN2, while the rest they pick up optionally being on ESPNU. They also locked in BYU to the Independence Bowl, basically.

How much does BYUs head FB coach make? How high profile and well paid is their MBB coach? Non revenue sports coaches? That should speak on some level to how successful they are as an independent.
 
The biggest watch parties I've seen in the DC area are USC's. And not by a little bit.

They have a national presence.

Every USC alumni I know talks about going to alumni events every so often.

Lots of these friends are in the foreign service, when we talk football they talk about going to watch parties in Hong Kong, Mexico City, etc, etc.

But tell me more about how they don't have a "national" audience.

USC has powerful alums that are wealthy. Its a destination school. They are also in the heart of the nations largest TV market. I think they could easily get ND level money from someone.
 
How much does BYUs head FB coach make? How high profile and well paid is their MBB coach? Non revenue sports coaches? That should speak on some level to how successful they are as an independent.
It's not really correlated. BYU is pretty serious about the religious mission and not spending its resources in this way. Historically an athletic department that pays significantly below market value and this has never had anything to do with what they can afford. It's why Bronco left for UVA.

They are always able to get good coaches anyway by leveraging it as almost an LDS mission/obligation for a qualified coach.
 
DirecTV still has a lot of bar/restaurant subs. If those go, then it is time to worry. Right now, there’s nobody else showing every NFL game. If the P12 isn’t available there, you’re losing a lot of sports fans.

The NFL could assume that business at some point. If ATT under invests or ****s up DTV too much that could push the NFL to step in And take it over. The NFL could also just license Sunday Ticket to ESPN, Amazon, or someone else. In todays streaming world it wont be that hard.
 
The NFL could assume that business at some point. If ATT under invests or ****s up DTV too much that could push the NFL to step in And take it over. The NFL could also just license Sunday Ticket to ESPN, Amazon, or someone else. In todays streaming world it wont be that hard.
Agreed. But, those are IF scenarios. DirecTV/ATT would be signaling the end if they permit that scenario.
 
Agreed. But, those are IF scenarios. DirecTV/ATT would be signaling the end if they permit that scenario.
It might be the near the end. NFL could come to their senses and see that Ticket could be more profitable as a readily available option, like NBA league pass, instead hitching the wagon to a soon to be irrelevant exclusive technology provider.
 
It might be the near the end. NFL could come to their senses and see that Ticket could be more profitable as a readily available option, like NBA league pass, instead hitching the wagon to a soon to be irrelevant exclusive technology provider.
The owners of the NFL aren’t progressive. If DirecTV/ATT provides them with a competitive revenue stream that enables them to control broadcast terms (blackouts) and can double dip (Sunday Ticket + Broadcast TV) they’ll go for it. If DirecTV/ATT decides to throw in the towel, streaming is something NFL owners will consider.

DirecTV/ATT still has a significant number of rabid sports fans who can only see a sliver of P12 games. That is the current system for the foreseeable future. We can cry into the wind all we want. The P12 is still getting lapped in current deals and will be lapped again when the B1G and $EC get to renegotiate before the P12’s current deal is done. If the teams in those conferences each get to make $250-$300 million more than every P12 school in TV revenue over two deals, call it a night for P12 competitiveness.
 
It might be the near the end. NFL could come to their senses and see that Ticket could be more profitable as a readily available option, like NBA league pass, instead hitching the wagon to a soon to be irrelevant exclusive technology provider.
NFL has felt that way for a while, imo. But DTV based its entire business model on this exclusive and when negotiations came up they kept saying yes to whatever the NFL decided to make them pay. Fleeced and it's the real reason DTV wasn't in a position to meet terms on PACN -- all its bets were riding on the NFL and it didn't leave room for paying the rate Limo Larry demanded as the standard rate.
 
Agreed. But, those are IF scenarios. DirecTV/ATT would be signaling the end if they permit that scenario.

ATT is already pruning the DTV customer base by getting rid of lower margin customers. ive posted about this here in this thread and in the cord cutter thread. ATT is one of the most heavily leveraged companies in America which will cause it pressure from shareholders someday to bring its debt position down.
 
NFL has felt that way for a while, imo. But DTV based its entire business model on this exclusive and when negotiations came up they kept saying yes to whatever the NFL decided to make them pay. Fleeced and it's the real reason DTV wasn't in a position to meet terms on PACN -- all its bets were riding on the NFL and it didn't leave room for paying the rate Limo Larry demanded as the standard rate.

the problem for all the middle men like Dish, Dtv, Comcast is that the content owners continually raise prices on them. Disney buying ABC, ESPN, and Fox is one way they have insured the highest costs possible because they have the power to pull the plug on sooooo much content. The SEC, the B1G UT and others are the beneficiary of that clout. The puny little PAC12 Network has no chance on its own for that reason. Much like Altittude. These channels are not worth the cost in the onslaught of customers like myself and luke who realized we were getting ripped off and canceled.
 
The owners of the NFL aren’t progressive. If DirecTV/ATT provides them with a competitive revenue stream that enables them to control broadcast terms (blackouts) and can double dip (Sunday Ticket + Broadcast TV) they’ll go for it. If DirecTV/ATT decides to throw in the towel, streaming is something NFL owners will consider.

DirecTV/ATT still has a significant number of rabid sports fans who can only see a sliver of P12 games. That is the current system for the foreseeable future. We can cry into the wind all we want. The P12 is still getting lapped in current deals and will be lapped again when the B1G and $EC get to renegotiate before the P12’s current deal is done. If the teams in those conferences each get to make $250-$300 million more than every P12 school in TV revenue over two deals, call it a night for P12 competitiveness.
I agree that NFL is not progressive, But ATT/DTV will have real competition in that auction. At some point a Bowlen like owner will influence the current owners and they’ll realize the blackouts are not to their advantage. They like money and will agree.

The P12 in the mean time is guaranteed nothing through any NFL deal. Whether it’s geography, culture, mismanagement of this conference. It’s hard to imagine making up the ground lost with these 12 schools.

CU is fortunately in a desirable market with a modicum of brand, so I’ll hang my hat on that for not being left behind. But at best we will continue to play catch up until there is a sea change.
 
ATT is already pruning the DTV customer base by getting rid of lower margin customers. ive posted about this here in this thread and in the cord cutter thread. ATT is one of the most heavily leveraged companies in America which will cause it pressure from shareholders someday to bring its debt position down.
In the next 5 years or nah?
 
the problem for all the middle men like Dish, Dtv, Comcast is that the content owners continually raise prices on them. Disney buying ABC, ESPN, and Fox is one way they have insured the highest costs possible because they have the power to pull the plug on sooooo much content. The SEC, the B1G UT and others are the beneficiary of that clout. The puny little PAC12 Network has no chance on its own for that reason. Much like Altittude. These channels are not worth the cost in the onslaught of customers like myself and luke who realized we were getting ripped off and canceled.
Yep. There was a bigger business risk to saying no on Longhorn Network and it had nothing to do with subscriber interest -- everything to do with all the other content controlled by Disney.

For that reason, it would have made sense for Pac-12 to have sold a share of PACN to ESPN or FOX even if it was less than the 49% other conferences gave.
 
Yeah, but do we lose RG to the position?
If we do, he'll do more to grow CU revenue as Commish than he ever could as our AD. Would suck in a lot of ways, but we'd still benefit a ton.

If it does come to pass that LS is removed I think it would behove the P12 to open their checkbook (again) and get someone (again) who has a background in negotiating these kinds of deals. Someone from the B1G, SEC, or NFL. Or hire one of those conferences former comissioners as a consultnt.

Either way RG is not the dude for that.
 
Did you hear the rumor that DC comics might be sold to Disney? ATT owns that thru its Time Warner acquisition. If it happens Id say its somewhat less than 5 years.

Selling TW properties means that they’re going to let DTV go belly up within 5 years? Interesting. We’ll see I guess.
 
Yep. There was a bigger business risk to saying no on Longhorn Network and it had nothing to do with subscriber interest -- everything to do with all the other content controlled by Disney.

For that reason, it would have made sense for Pac-12 to have sold a share of PACN to ESPN or FOX even if it was less than the 49% other conferences gave.

The 2024 TV deal I would think would have to include the sale of 50% of the P12N. Once its bundled its on everyones network. And the drag of productions costs on conference finances ends. But so does 6 separate channels. Remember that the ACC and SEC signed 20 year deals for their networks and theyll be stuck into the 2030s with roughly the same payments theyre getting now. Which might be good but will probably be bad as others will renegotiate. We only signed a 12 year deal in 2011 so hopefully we can sell it and get another shorter deal again so were not stuck.
 
Selling TW properties means that they’re going to let DTV go belly up within 5 years? Interesting. We’ll see I guess.
No, theyre selling to relieve their debt costs. They have an activist on their board thats pushing for more share holder value. Debt they accrued to purchase multiple comapnies at the same time they bought DTV.

I posted This as an example of how they are not investing in or growing the DTV business. The multiple years reports that DTV has been losing subscribers;



They bought in 2015 for $67 billion and had less subscribers by 2017. And its been getting worse. Its not a growth entity within the company which has $153b in debt. DTV is estimated to be worth far less than what they paid.

 

Not larry related, but thought as good a place as any.

USC and Bohn will be using their leverage to get the best deal they can get if not for the entire Pac-12.

When the Dodgers and Lakers have those huge media rights deals, it would be foolish for USC and UCLA not to at least explore having their own third tier media rights deals.
 

Also, it sparked internal conversations over the Fourth of July weekend about whether the Pac-12 CEO Group -- the conference’s chancellors and presidents -- might make an early move on Scott. His contract expires in the summer of 2022. The conference’s media rights contracts expire in 2024, and that date has long been viewed as the target opportunity for the Pac-12 to close the gap with its Power Five Conference peers when it comes to both exposure limitations and revenue shortfalls.

“There’s serious talk amongst the Pac-12 CEO Group,” said one high-level conference administrator, “to end his contract ahead of the expiration date to have a fighting chance to save the (conference) Networks.”
 
\
giphy.gif
 
Back
Top