You said that no one would look at Schwartz and see him as talented, in the context of Boyle's decision to recruit him. That is inconsistent with him being a well rated recruit.
Parquet is getting consistent minutes and earning them. Over 1/3rd of his career minutes have come in the last 11 games. You could say he fails to fill the boxscore or is inconsistent. He's a sophomore with <600 minutes on the floor, a reasonable take is he's shown the ability to be a rotation player. but not to be a star. .
Walton has not panned out, he's fine on the roster as a local kid who had huge upside if he could get strong legs underneath him. We saw flashes of that in 2018 with a handful of double digit scoring games. It was a risk, but more scholarships than rotation spots there should be some of these risks.
Kountz has definitely shown flashes of the rim attacking explosiveness that you're pining for. The consistent (or really any eye-popping) results are not there, the physical talent is.
Your argument reads as though Tad hasn't assembled a roster capable of competing in a mid-major conference. He's consistently in or above the middle 1/3rd of the Pac12 with the players he has in the fold. It's logically impossible to be a subpar recruiter, with subpar talent, subpar development, and subpar in game coaching, yet somehow achieve slightly above average results.
Tad has CU as an average to slightly above average Pac12 basketball team. I'm not satisified with it and would like much better too; I'm just not buying the hyperbole that it's an unmitigated **** show.
