Whats your definition of tier 2-consistently winning 8 or 9 games like Wisconsin and Utah find a way to do?I assume the proximity to Texas and joining the SEC will keep them at a big time program level, but is there any chance that program permanently takes a step back to a lower tier? Not to the extent ****braska has, necessarily, but maybe just more of a tier two kind of program?
They’ve just had Stoops and Riley for 22 years to continue the momentum, and I’m just wondering if Norman, OK is a place where blue chip kids are still going to want to be, ala Lincoln, NE
Venables to OU ("verbal") per Bleacher Report. Strongly rumored on multiple tweets.
I think they've got a fair amount of talent-they were so badly coached on in particular offense. Riley wins bigger long term, but DeBoer could pull off a bigger 2022.I think that makes a lot of sense for them. Good coach who knows the region.
I know Venables isn't happening there today-but that would make a ton of sense.The OU coaching search really should be a hoot. Flight trackers, airport spies, fake tweets, you name it.
I know Venables isn't happening there today-but that would make a ton of sense.
They’re probably right.UW fans are saying "if Riley is a home run than DeBoer is a triple".
Can't say our hiring of the hot MWC/ex-WAC coaches weren't big at the time.They’re probably right.
It’s sad how little CU actually cares about athletics.
Yep, because a 12-6 record in a second tier G5 conference screams, "just a small step below Lincoln Riley".UW fans are saying "if Riley is a home run than DeBoer is a triple".
I think it could be, sure. OU under Riley was up and down defensively-and Venables is the best DC in the sport IMO. Question would be who is his OC?Isn't it too obvious tho?
I know a guy who just became available.I think it could be, sure. OU under Riley was up and down defensively-and Venables is the best DC in the sport IMO. Question would be who is his OC?
I think it could be, sure. OU under Riley was up and down defensively-and Venables is the best DC in the sport IMO. Question would be who is his OC?
Still a better fit there then some of the guys with connections to Chris Petersen I kept hearing-Wilcox and Harsin in particular. They need a fresh start after the disaster that Lake was.Yep, because a 12-6 record in a second tier G5 conference screams, "just a small step below Lincoln Riley".
I don't think Venables would be too keen on taking that job, especially with Bob Stoops heavily involved.
A couple things to respond to this-OU rarely ever hires sitting head coaches. Tramel said they've done it once (Schellenberger) and it was a disaster for them. Venables hasn't gotten a shot at a job he can't turn down I don't think, and he's also got a pretty good relationship with the OU AD-his move to Clemson wasn't anything like Heupel leaving there (my understanding was he left of his own accord).I mean Venables' OU history and his reluctance to leave Clemson. Maybe he really is the one guy who understands that being an elite level DC is his ceiling and he's perfectly content making 2.5m under Dabo at Clemson and has no ambition for more.
DeBoer may end up being a great hire, but he feels more like a good hire for CU, not UW. Washington is supposed to be a pretty good job with a lot of resources and institutional support. Just feels a bit underwhelming for them, but maybe I'm wrong.Still a better fit there then some of the guys with connections to Chris Petersen I kept hearing-Wilcox and Harsin in particular. They need a fresh start after the disaster that Lake was.
Tramel said on Dan Patrick he's happy to step in and save their class and coach the bowl game.....but doesn't think he wants back in full time.There will be a lot of pressure on Bob Stoops to take the job. I don’t think he wants the job, but if they throw $10MM/yr at him fully guaranteed for 5 years, does he say no?
There will be a lot of pressure on Bob Stoops to take the job. I don’t think he wants the job, but if they throw $10MM/yr at him fully guaranteed for 5 years, does he say no?
Could it be the glut of other really good jobs this year? Florida, LSU, USC, and Oklahoma are all better than Washington as a coaching job at least IMO.DeBoer may end up being a great hire, but he feels more like a good hire for CU, not UW. Washington is supposed to be a pretty good job with a lot of resources and institutional support. Just feels a bit underwhelming for them, but maybe I'm wrong.
For sure, and they were never swimming in that pond. I would just think someone like Grinch, Sataki, Wilcox, maybe Chip, Joe Moorehead, etc are the type of names they'd be in the market for.Could it be the glut of other really good jobs this year? Florida, LSU, USC, and Oklahoma are all better than Washington as a coaching job at least IMO.
A couple things to respond to this-OU rarely ever hires sitting head coaches. Tramel said they've done it once (Schellenberger) and it was a disaster for them. Venables hasn't gotten a shot at a job he can't turn down I don't think, and he's also got a pretty good relationship with the OU AD-his move to Clemson wasn't anything like Heupel leaving there (my understanding was he left of his own accord).
Another Blue Blood opening up would be amazing