What in the actual ****
It's going to be glorious watching Kelly's epic failure there in real time.
What in the actual ****
Fat fingered the keyboard?? It’s D2F.
I think they’ll be okHahaha their going full CU and they never won a natty.
fifyI think they’ll be just ducky
It's pretty funny that they are going full "Ducks for Life", however, advocating for a guy like Wilcox is slightly different than advocating for Jon Embree. Lol this program
No. They are not the same. Wilcox is a good coach. Embree has never even been a successful coordinator.Different, yet the same. Too bad their AD didn't cave to the pressure and bring in Wilcox.
No. They are not the same. Wilcox is a good coach. Embree has never even been a successful coordinator.
Yeah, it's easy to win at Cal. No need to look at the actual situation.And yet the situations are much the same. A bunch of former players putting heavy pressure on the AD to hire "their" guy, a Buff/Duck 4 Life. Wilcox is a proven .500 HC that has been a successful DC at the P5 level. As an opponent of UO, I would feel quite a bit less nervous about UO with Wilcox at the helm instead of Lanning.
So Clemson is just promoting from within for both OC and DC. Would not be surprised if Clemson slides back to 9-3/8-4 type territory going forward.
The U loving this…So Clemson is just promoting from within for both OC and DC. Would not be surprised if Clemson slides back to 9-3/8-4 type territory going forward.
Clemson being good is good for college football.So Clemson is just promoting from within for both OC and DC. Would not be surprised if Clemson slides back to 9-3/8-4 type territory going forward.
I agree about Clemson. Not because there's anything special about that school. But because they showed that a mid-revenue P5 that has to go out-of-state to recruit can still go on a dominant run. We don't need "Clemson" but the sport desperately needs "a Clemson".Clemson being good is good for college football.
I hope you are wrong, but I think you are right.
They’re also very close to a couple huge recruiting territories in GA and FLI agree about Clemson. Not because there's anything special about that school. But because they showed that a mid-revenue P5 that has to go out-of-state to recruit can still go on a dominant run. We don't need "Clemson" but the sport desperately needs "a Clemson".
Sure. But they've significantly outperformed numerous programs that are in similar or better situations.They’re also very close to a couple huge recruiting territories in GA and FL
......or 2 or 3.I agree about Clemson. Not because there's anything special about that school. But because they showed that a mid-revenue P5 that has to go out-of-state to recruit can still go on a dominant run. We don't need "Clemson" but the sport desperately needs "a Clemson".
I agree about Clemson. Not because there's anything special about that school. But because they showed that a mid-revenue P5 that has to go out-of-state to recruit can still go on a dominant run. We don't need "Clemson" but the sport desperately needs "a Clemson".
So Clemson is just promoting from within for both OC and DC. Would not be surprised if Clemson slides back to 9-3/8-4 type territory going forward.
It will be interesting to see how the next few years go for them
It's easy to lose there too, which is what he does.Yeah, it's easy to win at Cal. No need to look at the actual situation.
About 2 pounds.The ****ing Fenway Bowl? Wtaf is that?
Probably in Anaheim.The ****ing Fenway Bowl? Wtaf is that?
Why? Until Dabo, it’d been decades since they were relevant. Didn’t need them then. Don’t need them now.Clemson being good is good for college football.
I hope you are wrong, but I think you are right.
John Torp was the MVP of that gameWhy? Until Dabo, it’d been decades since they were relevant. Didn’t need them then. Don’t need them now.
I think FSU/ Miami/UT/USC being good is better.
Clemson 19-10 Colorado (Dec 27, 2005) Final Score - ESPN
Game summary of the Clemson Tigers vs. Colorado Buffaloes NCAAF game, final score 19-10, from December 27, 2005 on ESPN.www.espn.com