You said rape twice.
:rofl:
You said rape twice.
Houston is threatening lawsuit. It will get ugly if the Big 12 expands but doesn't include them.
I think it is actually more of a threat to go to the state legislature and seek a reduction in state support for the budget of UT and TT if they don't force the Big 12 to give Houston an invite. A-la CSU and the idiotic game in Denver, etc.
I disagree with your order... Cinncinnati, CSU, Memphis, CSU, BYU, UNM, Boise, ....It is all about the TV sets. CSU can argue the Front Range market.
He and Sacky were never meant to be...
I disagree with your order... Cinncinnati, CSU, Memphis, CSU, BYU, UNM, Boise, ....It is all about the TV sets. CSU can argue the Front Range market.
A. La. VT to get the ACC inviteI think it is actually more of a threat to go to the state legislature and seek a reduction in state support for the budget of UT and TT if they don't force the Big 12 to give Houston an invite. A-la CSU and the idiotic game in Denver, etc.
:lol: at the notion that BYU doesn't deliver TV sets. Think about it.
Chuck Carlton @ChuckCarltonDMN 12h12 hours ago
Bowlsby confirms pro rata clause in TV contracts would match shares if league expands. But revenue from NCAA, CFP would be split more ways.
I disagree with your order... Cinncinnati, CSU, Memphis, CSU, BYU, UNM, Boise, ....It is all about the TV sets. CSU can argue the Front Range market.
Shut your dirty, whore mouth!It would be awesome if we could somehow get OU and some combination of others into the PAC. I recognize it is an extreme long shot, but would nice. I feel like we are left on an island in the PAC.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I disagree with your order... Cinncinnati, CSU, Memphis, CSU, BYU, UNM, Boise, ....It is all about the TV sets. CSU can argue the Front Range market.
Beebe contended that he could have saved the Big 12 from further disarray by convincing schools to adopt a Grant of Rights. It's a deal that guarantees if a school did leave the Big 12, its media rights and the TV revenues generated would remain with the Big 12 until the period of coverage ended.
The Big 12 does have such an agreement in place, which runs the length of its current TV contracts and serves as a strong financial deterrent to any school leaving the conference.
http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/roa...beebe-era-big-12-must-avoid-repeating-historythank the Grant of Rights clause, which runs through 2025 along with the current TV deal with ESPN
Shut your dirty, whore mouth!
The Big 8 was fine. But that died when we let those dirty, cheaters from the Southwest Conference in, and they took over. No one here misses the Big 12. No one.I know my thoughts are not popular, but I do miss the old big 8. At this time, I just don't care much about any of the PAC teams. Maybe once we are competent at football again, I'll start hating someone.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Big 8 was fine. But that died when we let those dirty, cheaters from the Southwest Conference in, and they took over. No one here misses the Big 12. No one.
I've never understood this statement. I like my dirty, whore mouths open.Shut your dirty, whore mouth!
I've never understood this statement. I like my dirty, whore mouths open.
NTTIAWWTI've never understood this statement. I like my dirty, whore mouths open.
Until numbers are brought in that shows CSU doesn't have any market share
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This can't be true, the last couple of pages of the realignment thread on Shaggybevo has several posts from "experts on the State of Colorado" about how CSU is better than Colorado anyway and that there are "way more" CSU fans and that they own the metro area and would curb stomp us every year if they were a P5 team. :wow:
Man I wish we'd at least get decent again. We may have been disliked but we used to at least be acknowledged as a decent program.
This can't be true, the last couple of pages of the realignment thread on Shaggybevo has several posts from "experts on the State of Colorado" about how CSU is better than Colorado anyway and that there are "way more" CSU fans and that they own the metro area and would curb stomp us every year if they were a P5 team. :wow:
Man I wish we'd at least get decent again. We may have been disliked but we used to at least be acknowledged as a decent program.
Sort of like 62-3670-3 pretty much killed any respect CU had earned from the Horns. Nothing short of a retaliatory curb stomp will restore that.
True, but you'd think their numbers would greatly increase if CSU moved to P5 and played opponents who were actually interesting. You could argue this for every team on list, of course, but being in a large market provides an even greater opportunity. If we are being realistic we know CU has a big head start on CSU's attendance simply from being P5, having the buzz and increased national coverage that goes with that, and playing a P5 schedule. CSU is never going to have impressive tv or attendance numbers playing teams like San Jose State and New Mexico.Until numbers are brought in that shows CSU doesn't have any market share