I'm really hoping this is hyperbole because when I look at some of the other infractions that have gone on in college hoops over the last 10-15 years and the penalties.... yeah... lower your expectations BIG TIME.Zona should receive a 5 year post season ban and loss of 2 scholarships per year for 5 years.
I’m not saying that’s what they will get. I’m saying that’s what I wish they would get. I’m not that naive!I'm really hoping this is hyperbole because when I look at some of the other infractions that have gone on in college hoops over the last 10-15 years and the penalties.... yeah... lower your expectations BIG TIME.
I don't think fans are as bothered about cheating as we pretend to be. We don't like it blatantly in our faces. And we don't like to be reminded that most of us follow programs that have little chance because we can't offer competitive deals to prospects.Cheating in college sports has excellent ROI. That’s just a fact. There is no downside, except some occasional finger wagging. I’m not even sure if it’s ethically wrong since most of college athletics is what economists refer to as “rent-seeking” where most of the benefits accrue to ownership (the schools, coaches, media, etc.) whereas the workers (players) get a relatively small slice of the pie.
I don't think fans are as bothered about cheating as we pretend to be. We don't like it blatantly in our faces. And we don't like to be reminded that most of us follow programs that have little chance because we can't offer competitive deals to prospects.
I don't think fans are as bothered about cheating as we pretend to be. We don't like it blatantly in our faces. And we don't like to be reminded that most of us follow programs that have little chance because we can't offer competitive deals to prospects.
I see it as only a matter of time that the federal government sees the abuses like Baylor, Oregon, MSU, PSU, Miami, kNU, etc. and the NCAA doing almost nothing about it and legislation gets passed that starts federal oversight of college athletics.The only reason Arizona infractions (paying players) bother me is because we’re not doing it. I don’t give a flying **** if the NCAA sanctions them. Nor should they. You think anyone at Auburn wouldn’t trade the one year postseason ban for a final four? That’s what I thought.
Oregon (sexual assault) and Baylor (Baylor) on the other hand can go straight to hell and I want the NCAA to make them cry.
I don’t think you’ll find enough political will for the above anytime soon.I see it as only a matter of time that the federal government sees the abuses like Baylor, Oregon, MSU, PSU, Miami, kNU, etc. and the NCAA doing almost nothing about it and legislation gets passed that starts federal oversight of college athletics.
They will base it on title IX protections and put it under either Justice or Education. Enforcement will come through eligibility for federal grants, research dollars, contracts, and far and away the biggest eligibility for federally guaranteed student loans.
If people think the death penalty for SMU was a program wrecker watch what happens if the feds say that a college or university is not eligible to enroll new students in student loans.
All it will take is once and you will see a complete change in attitude towards what they will accept to win.
Only if it's something to do with cover-ups of practices and incidents that are endangering the welfare of other students and the community. Feds & politicians give zero ****s if a wealthy booster gave a star athlete a car.I don’t think you’ll find enough political will for the above anytime soon.
Even then, rampant Title IX violations that have gone on for years re: coverups of sex assaults have gone unpunished. It would take a big shift in congress to make these changes.Only if it's something to do with cover-ups of practices and incidents that are endangering the welfare of other students and the community. Feds & politicians give zero ****s if a wealthy booster gave a star athlete a car.
Biden was leading a Title IX reform at the end of the Obama administration. I bet it gets rebooted bigly.Even then, rampant Title IX violations that have gone on for years re: coverups of sex assaults have gone unpunished. It would take a big shift in congress to make these changes.
Given the current congressional setup, that will be DOA.Biden was leading a Title IX reform at the end of the Obama administration. I bet it gets rebooted bigly.
All it will take is some junior congress member who wants to make a name for him/herself. Bringing Presidents, Athletic Directors, and Head Coaches from major universities before a congressional hearing is a guarantee of media coverage and probably some face time on the national networks.Only if it's something to do with cover-ups of practices and incidents that are endangering the welfare of other students and the community. Feds & politicians give zero ****s if a wealthy booster gave a star athlete a car.
Cheating on all sports at the highest level has excellent ROI. Astros, Patriots, et al have proven that. This whole situation will only serve to prove my point in the long run.Cheating in college sports has excellent ROI. That’s just a fact. There is no downside, except some occasional finger wagging. I’m not even sure if it’s ethically wrong since most of college athletics is what economists refer to as “rent-seeking” where most of the benefits accrue to ownership (the schools, coaches, media, etc.) whereas the workers (players) get a relatively small slice of the pie.
I know Arizona is an historic powerhouse, but all the good recruits Miller got and was getting felt weird. Kids go to schools knowing the money drawer is open and flowing. He should be gone, but we shall see.Bribes and fake transcripts. Failure to monitor staff or program by HC. Miller's done.
This is serious stuff, heads need to roll.I know Arizona is an historic powerhouse, but all the good recruits Miller got and was getting felt weird. Kids go to schools knowing the money drawer is open and flowing. He should be gone, but we shall see.
Like Pitino at Louisville I actually believe they didn’t know. I think that everything was done both by Pitino/Miller and the assistants to make sure they didn’t know, but I honestly believe the head coaches are kept far far FAR out of the loop on anything.“Failed to monitor?” Yeah. Right. No way that Miller didn’t know what his assistants were doing. Maybe he didn’t want to know any details for plausible deniability, but he damned well knew.
These guys didn’t know the particulars of dollar amounts and dates/times, but they knew what was going on in their programs. They knew what they were getting when they hired bagmen type assistants.Like Pitino at Louisville I actually believe they didn’t know. I think that everything was done both by Pitino/Miller and the assistants to make sure they didn’t know, but I honestly believe the head coaches are kept far far FAR out of the loop on anything.
That’s what I meant by “plausible deniability.”Like Pitino at Louisville I actually believe they didn’t know. I think that everything was done both by Pitino/Miller and the assistants to make sure they didn’t know, but I honestly believe the head coaches are kept far far FAR out of the loop on anything.
Like Pitino at Louisville I actually believe they didn’t know. I think that everything was done both by Pitino/Miller and the assistants to make sure they didn’t know, but I honestly believe the head coaches are kept far far FAR out of the loop on anything.
They knew who the assistants were that they hired and how they worked. They knew what resources were flowing to the assistants, where they came from, and how they were expected to be used.These guys didn’t know the particulars of dollar amounts and dates/times, but they knew what was going on in their programs. They knew what they were getting when they hired bagmen type assistants.
This is why “failure to monitor” actually has become a big deal. Plausible deniability is not an excuse anymore. Buck stops with the head coach. Of course with the caveat that this is if the NCAA decides to do anything about it.That’s what I meant by “plausible deniability.”