What's new
  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Wyoming Game Week Thread - Saturday at some ungodly time

My concern is that the plays installed in the spring are mostly awful, don't fit into or enhance a workable, integrated scheme against teams that have scouted us--at all, and lack any creativity, effective motion, or misdirection.

Also, when was the last time we ran a successful trick play? When was the last time we hit a simple, easy third down conversion that looked like we knew what the D was going to do and beat that?
The plays installed in the spring resemble the schemed plays run by many of the currently undefeated teams in major college football. The plays aren’t awful, the OC is awful.
 
This is actually pretty wild, considering we have been talking about how the run defense is awful. Truth is, it's actually been pretty good, they just haven't been able to get off the field in short yardage situations.

I don't have the stats/splits to back this up, but this tells me teams just haven't been in 2nd or 3rd and long situations very often against CU. They make sure it's positive play after positive play, even if it's only 3 yards at a time to set up 3rd or 4th and short.

If I'm Livingston, I'm loading up to stop the run on every 1st down play

1758232606265.png
 
This is actually pretty wild, considering we have been talking about how the run defense is awful. Truth is, it's actually been pretty good, they just haven't been able to get off the field in short yardage situations.

I don't have the stats/splits to back this up, but this tells me teams just haven't been in 2nd or 3rd and long situations very often against CU. They make sure it's positive play after positive play, even if it's only 3 yards at a time to set up 3rd or 4th and short.

If I'm Livingston, I'm loading up to stop the run on every 1st down play

View attachment 91628
It would be interesting to see the data (i.e. how many yards are the LB's giving up to the RB/TE's on first and second down passes across the middle that present many 3rd down and 1 or 2 yards. Also, how far the CB's are playing off their WR so the passes out to the flat on 1st or 2nd down net 8 yards per attempt, etc...).
 
This is actually pretty wild, considering we have been talking about how the run defense is awful. Truth is, it's actually been pretty good, they just haven't been able to get off the field in short yardage situations.

I don't have the stats/splits to back this up, but this tells me teams just haven't been in 2nd or 3rd and long situations very often against CU. They make sure it's positive play after positive play, even if it's only 3 yards at a time to set up 3rd or 4th and short.

If I'm Livingston, I'm loading up to stop the run on every 1st down play

View attachment 91628
If I'm Livingston, I'm demanding HCP get a real OC that gives my dudes some help by sustaining drives and scoring meaningful points. #FckPS
 
This is actually pretty wild, considering we have been talking about how the run defense is awful. Truth is, it's actually been pretty good, they just haven't been able to get off the field in short yardage situations.

I don't have the stats/splits to back this up, but this tells me teams just haven't been in 2nd or 3rd and long situations very often against CU. They make sure it's positive play after positive play, even if it's only 3 yards at a time to set up 3rd or 4th and short.

If I'm Livingston, I'm loading up to stop the run on every 1st down play

View attachment 91628
A friend of mine is a handicapper and physical therapist. Half of the formula for how he grades defenses is evaluating what % of defensive time on the field is based on defensive errors; which % of defensive time on the field is due to insufficient recovery; which % is due to personnal deficiencies; what % of defensive time on the field is due to injury. Then he compares that to points per play allowed.

His conclusions:

Highest % sources of defensive deficiency are 1) insufficient recovery, 2) personnel deficincies, and 3) defensive errors.

The scheme is acceptable. The offense’s inefficiency, defense’s heavy rotation, and defense’s disparities in player quality is why our defense has been bad this year (what we knew is now proven by study).
 
This is actually pretty wild, considering we have been talking about how the run defense is awful. Truth is, it's actually been pretty good, they just haven't been able to get off the field in short yardage situations.

I don't have the stats/splits to back this up, but this tells me teams just haven't been in 2nd or 3rd and long situations very often against CU. They make sure it's positive play after positive play, even if it's only 3 yards at a time to set up 3rd or 4th and short.

If I'm Livingston, I'm loading up to stop the run on every 1st down play

View attachment 91628
The biggest weapon in college football is a dual threat QB. It’s so hard to defend. CU needs to load the box with a spy on the QB, especially on 3rd downs.
 
The plays that were repped in August practices weren't bad TBH. The problem is I have only seen 1/4 of them in actual games.

The plays installed in the spring resemble the schemed plays run by many of the currently undefeated teams in major college football. The plays aren’t awful, the OC is awful.

Why!?!? How!?!?

It's an easy answer.

The playcaller is shît.

If he had any talent as a playcaller, he wouldn't be our OC, but would probably still be coaching in the NFL.

He can design plays. He can build an offense. He can come up with a decent strategy and game plan.

He is absolute shît executing the strategy and gameplan in actual games.
 
It's an easy answer.

The playcaller is shît.

If he had any talent as a playcaller, he wouldn't be our OC, but would probably still be coaching in the NFL.

He can design plays. He can build an offense. He can come up with a decent strategy and game plan.

He is absolute shît executing the strategy and gameplan in actual games.
Some coaches are really good in a film room and/or on a practice field but are not good in game coaches. Shurmur is very respected but on game day he is and always has been subpar.
 
Last edited:
The plays installed in the spring resemble the schemed plays run by many of the currently undefeated teams in major college football. The plays aren’t awful, the OC is awful.
“Resemble” is doing a ton of heavy lifting here. LOL

I think the problem is in the details of each play and what isn’t being focused on or taught: An initial hand placement here, small counter-step there, subtle brush of a combination block dealing with a stunt, etc.

It’s like teaching the Option: few plays, but the smartly taught details executed by everyone in sync make ALL the difference.
 
Last edited:
My five hopes for Wyoming:

1. We win the game decisively in all three phases.

2. The D makes big strides. We play physical and energized. Players just make plays buzzing all around the field. Have 3 & outs, shorten Wyoming's drives and force punts.

3. Break some play-makers loose on O, however we do it. We need gash plays to energize those guys and build connections. We need guys to step-up and win 1on1 battles making all uncontested catches, but some contested ones as well. This includes the Oline making progress.

4. A solid QB outing by Salter showing growth and some explosiveness. We need him to have confidence going into next week. KS--"play pants on fire."

5. Our coaches demonstrate that they are meshing moving towards playing complementary football. We can complain about Prime, the OC, DC or individual coaches, but the key is playing complementary football and making adjustments. Coordination between coaching above in the box and those on field is just as key, as play-calling. Do not have a Q, where we lose the TOP battle 10 min to 5 min, unless we are scoring points so fast my head is on a swivel.

I would ask for sound fundamental football, however CU will still be a work in progress after this game.
 
Last edited:
My five hopes for Wyoming:

1. We win the game decisively in all three phases.

2. The D makes big strides. We play physical and energized. Players just make plays buzzing all around the field. Have 3 & outs, shorten Wyoming's drives and force punts.

3. Break some play-makers loose on O, however we do it. We need gash plays to energize those guys and build connections. We need guys to step-up and win 1on1 battles. This includes the Oline making progress.

4. A solid QB outing by Salter showing growth and some explosiveness. We need him to have confidence going into next week. KS--"play pants on fire."

5. Our coaches are meshing moving towards playing complementary football. We can complain about Prime, the OC, DC or individual coaches, but the key is playing complementary football and making adjustments. Coordination between coaching above in the box and those on field is just as key, as play-calling. Do not have a Q, where we lose the TOP battle 10 min to 5 min, unless we are scoring points so fast my head is on a swivel.

I would ask for sound fundamental football, however CU will still be a work in progress after this game.
and then you woke up ;)
 
Back
Top