My point exactly. Nor should they have to release them to their foe just because he graduated.
So even though they put in 3-4 years of work in to graduate, sometimes early, to put themselves in a better situation, they shouldn't be able to go where they want? The NCAA and these programs take and take, and you think after putting in all that work to graduate that allowing a kid to choose where he goes is somehow inexcusable? I understand that they should be held accountable to stay at an institution until graduation as that is what they committed to, but after that, it shouldn't matter. I know it is seldom the case where kids actually use this rule for the main reason of getting a masters degree that their university doesn't offer, but for the ones that actually do, why take away the ability for these kids to get a master's degree for free by playing football? A lot can change in a program in 4 years, and a lot can change for a kid when he is 17 years old to when he is 22 years old. I think this new rule is one of the better ones the NCAA has made in a long time (lord knows there aren't many good choices they make), and it is win win because it is incentive to actually put work into their education, and can put them in a better situation if they don't like the one they are in after 3-4 years.
So even though they put in 3-4 years of work in to graduate, sometimes early, to put themselves in a better situation, they shouldn't be able to go where they want? The NCAA and these programs take and take, and you think after putting in all that work to graduate that allowing a kid to choose where he goes is somehow inexcusable? I understand that they should be held accountable to stay at an institution until graduation as that is what they committed to, but after that, it shouldn't matter. I know it is seldom the case where kids actually use this rule for the main reason of getting a masters degree that their university doesn't offer, but for the ones that actually do, why take away the ability for these kids to get a master's degree for free by playing football? A lot can change in a program in 4 years, and a lot can change for a kid when he is 17 years old to when he is 22 years old. I think this new rule is one of the better ones the NCAA has made in a long time (lord knows there aren't many good choices they make), and it is win win because it is incentive to actually put work into their education, and can put them in a better situation if they don't like the one they are in after 3-4 years.
What's to prevent the kid from transferring to one school, and then to Georgia?But he knows what's best, at least that's his line to the mom:
“The university is continuing to be resistant to any request to release my son. That’s where we are,” Samyra Smith said. “In (Saban’s) mind, the best decision is for him to stay here. And he doesn’t think anything other than that is best for the kid.”
I am quite comfortable with this approach.I really wouldn't mind if there was a conference rule. There should be. But I really don't like the idea of a HC having unilateral control over where a graduated former player is allowed to transfer.
To me, it should be simple. No grad transfers within the conference or to an opponent on that season's schedule as a conference policy.
Nebraska and Georgia fans have been throwing a hissy fit on Twitter because the Olympics hijacked their hashtags. #UGA is the hashtag for the Ugandan team and #GBR for team Great Britain.
I feel their pain. Dealing with #GoBuffs from West Texas U and a few high schools grinds my gears bad enough.
and two in a week? whats going on there?Lost their top six WRs from last year and now a 4* who was a star on the scout team while he was a RS. Same article has Webb throwing a pick 6 in practice.
I would have liked to have him in here to see what he can do but don't forget that he left TTU because he got beat out. This could turn out less than what he and others expected it to be for him.
Damn. T&P for the kid's family
terribleDamn. T&P for the kid's family
Honest question: is MM's blueprint anything like Meyer's or Herman's?Cool read on how Herman is trying to duplicate Urban Meyer's approach to building a winner.
http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...om-herman-patterned-their-success-urban-meyer
No idea. Not sure it can be to a T anyways. CU was/is a very, very different animal when MM took over than what Urban took over at Florida and OSU and what Herman took over at Houston.Honest question: is MM's blueprint anything like Meyer's or Herman's?
Watching Hard Knocks and Goff doesn't know which direction the sun rises. How about that Cal degree?