AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
2019-20 Pac-12 MBB Thread
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
Seeding: The seedings and pairings shall be determined upon completion of regular season play. The won-lost percentage record of the teams in regular season Conference play will determine tournament seedings. The team with the best won-lost percentage in Conference play will be seeded #1, the next best won-lost percentage in Conference play will be seeded #2, and so forth through all the seeds.
Tie-Breakers: Tie-breaking procedures for determining all tournament seeding will be:
1. Two-team tie
a. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular season.
b. Each team’s record (won-lost percentage) vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular standings, and then continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
When arriving at another group of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record (won-lost percentage) against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to that group’s own tie-breaking procedure), rather than the performance against individual tied teams.
c. Won-lost percentage against all Division I opponents.
d. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
2. Multiple-team tie
a. Results (won-lost percentage) of collective head-to-head competition during the regular season among the tied teams.
b. If more than two teams are still tied, each of the tied team’s record (won-lost percentage) vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular season standings, and then continuing down through the standings, eliminating teams with inferior records, until one team gains an advantage.
When arriving at another group of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record (won-lost percentage) against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to that group’s own tie-breaking procedure), rather than the performance against individual tied teams.
After one team has an advantage and is seeded, all remaining teams in the multiple-team tie-breaker will repeat the multiple-team tie-breaking procedure.
If at any point the multiple-team tie is reduced to two teams, the two-team tie-breaking procedure will be applied.
c. Won-lost percentage against all Division I opponents.
d. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
Do you also read that as both of our wins against ASU counting toward the tiebreaker if they end up tied with us? There's nothing in the language specific to conference play.
Seeding: The seedings and pairings shall be determined upon completion of regular season play. The won-lost percentage record of the teams in regular season Conference play will determine tournament seedings. The team with the best won-lost percentage in Conference play will be seeded #1, the next best won-lost percentage in Conference play will be seeded #2, and so forth through all the seeds.
Tie-Breakers: Tie-breaking procedures for determining all tournament seeding will be:
1. Two-team tie
a. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular season.
b. Each team’s record (won-lost percentage) vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular standings, and then continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
When arriving at another group of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record (won-lost percentage) against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to that group’s own tie-breaking procedure), rather than the performance against individual tied teams.
c. Won-lost percentage against all Division I opponents.
d. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
2. Multiple-team tie
a. Results (won-lost percentage) of collective head-to-head competition during the regular season among the tied teams.
b. If more than two teams are still tied, each of the tied team’s record (won-lost percentage) vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular season standings, and then continuing down through the standings, eliminating teams with inferior records, until one team gains an advantage.
When arriving at another group of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record (won-lost percentage) against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to that group’s own tie-breaking procedure), rather than the performance against individual tied teams.
After one team has an advantage and is seeded, all remaining teams in the multiple-team tie-breaker will repeat the multiple-team tie-breaking procedure.
If at any point the multiple-team tie is reduced to two teams, the two-team tie-breaking procedure will be applied.
c. Won-lost percentage against all Division I opponents.
d. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
Signed,
Buffnik S. Preston, Esquire
They never contemplated the idiotic idea of playing non conference games against conference teams!
Bubblebuff
Bubble buff
Alright I think where the conference standings are is 
great, we’re in first woo hoo! Gotta win out and we’re the champs. Slip up in cali, and we’ll need some help, originally I was thinking an oregon win at zona woul do us best, but now that Oregon lost already we need them to lose to Zona, as oregon will easily win their last three games, but we’ll have a commanding two game lead on them.
-Ducks are done.
We’ll still only be a half game ahead of Zona and Asu. We’re going to the Bay schools but zona and ASU are going to the LA schools. We have the best chance to sweep that weekend, and I’d bet each zona team loses at least one. If we sweep the Bay we’ll be nearly clinched going into the utah game with a 1.5 game lead. Basically rattle off five in a row, if we lose to utah we’ll at worst tie for the conference, but rattle off 6 straight and we’re playin at noon on Thursday in Vegas...aka see you Friday as the Pac champs!. We’ll also be pretty solid as a 3 seed range at this point if we win 6 straight, with a jump to 9 straight by winning the Pac 12 dual crown, we’ll be getting some nods from the committee at a 2 seeds. Life is good to dream. Sko Buffs
great, we’re in first woo hoo! Gotta win out and we’re the champs. Slip up in cali, and we’ll need some help, originally I was thinking an oregon win at zona woul do us best, but now that Oregon lost already we need them to lose to Zona, as oregon will easily win their last three games, but we’ll have a commanding two game lead on them. -Ducks are done.
We’ll still only be a half game ahead of Zona and Asu. We’re going to the Bay schools but zona and ASU are going to the LA schools. We have the best chance to sweep that weekend, and I’d bet each zona team loses at least one. If we sweep the Bay we’ll be nearly clinched going into the utah game with a 1.5 game lead. Basically rattle off five in a row, if we lose to utah we’ll at worst tie for the conference, but rattle off 6 straight and we’re playin at noon on Thursday in Vegas...aka see you Friday as the Pac champs!. We’ll also be pretty solid as a 3 seed range at this point if we win 6 straight, with a jump to 9 straight by winning the Pac 12 dual crown, we’ll be getting some nods from the committee at a 2 seeds. Life is good to dream. Sko Buffs
BehindEnemyLines
beware the habu
Alright I think where the conference standings are is
-Ducks are done.
We’ll still only be a half game ahead of Zona and Asu. We’re going to the Bay schools but zona and ASU are going to the LA schools. We have the best chance to sweep that weekend, and I’d bet each zona team loses at least one. If we sweep the Bay we’ll be nearly clinched going into the utah game with a 1.5 game lead. Basically rattle off five in a row, if we lose to utah we’ll at worst tie for the conference, but rattle off 6 straight and we’re playin at noon on Thursday in Vegas...aka see you Friday as the Pac champs!. We’ll also be pretty solid as a 3 seed range at this point if we win 6 straight, with a jump to 9 straight by winning the Pac 12 dual crown, we’ll be getting some nods from the committee at a 2 seeds. Life is good to dream. Sko Buffs
Yeah, I think zona over whoregon might be better for us. The quacks get their last 3 at home.
The wild-scats have a tougher schedule. I hope they drop at least one of their last 3.
LifeofaBuff
Well-Known Member
Expect Buff domination tomorrow.
Yes please.
That can’t last right? Arizona has 2 games at home vs the Washington schools and they have the tie breaker.
I just based it off of the current standings
There's no way. UofA will crush both Wash schools and we're going to lose to Utah. We're going to get the 5 seed and if we somehow get past UW we'll get UofA and get straight smoked.
Does your positivity know no limits?
Well, you can look back and see how much of a sunshine pumper I truly am for this team, but I don't like what I'm seeing, hearing and feeling about where this team is at currently. I'm having wicked flashbacks to 2015.
Perfect night for us. Now we just gotta win
Could not have had a better night for the Buffs as @Darth Snow just said. Hope they got it fixed this week and lay a beating on the Utes Sat.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
I don't care about a beating. To quote Al Davis-"Just win, baby."
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Doesn't matter. If we're the 4, I'd venture a guess that USC probably gets the five. That equals another shot at a Q1 W for us.
Was considered a Michigan lock but has an older brother playing for ASU.
Buffsbball
Well-Known Member
You've got to think if the NCAA was forward thinking in anyway a lot of this could have been avoided. Now they are finally proposing changes to players being able to make money off their likeness which should have happened 10-15 years ago at least. Seems like now they are finally realizing there are so many other routes with G league throwing serious money, australia, china and other leagues offering these kids some serious cash and an ability to develop their game. This year hurts Isaiah Todd would have played at Michigan, Nix at UCLA, Jalen Green was rumored potentially towards Oregon. It hurts the competiveness of college and the Pac-12 in particular which losses more players early than other leagues, and has to face that east coast bias.Now the NCAA is panicking and realizing it has to do something. https://www.espn.com/college-sports...e-possible-changes-allow-athlete-endorsements
Meh. College basketball shouldn't be a farm system for the NBA.
Agree. The G league should make it a priority to sign all the top (one and done type) prospects every year.