They look shook. And yet Michigan is so bad they still can't take full advantage of what they're being given.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
2022 NCAA Tournament Thread
- Thread starter torero
- Start date
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
ahahahahaha down 1.
Are you watching? Weird take. It's been a pretty clean game thus far.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
CSU looks like ****. Michigan can barely take advantage. Officials letting them play, but haven't seen much in the way of blatant missed calls.
Jamie Erdahl is hot.
****ing goats are choking... per usual... have let the fact that their outside shooting has cooled off effect every other part of their game.
I am, they're letting them play for the most part, but taking your first FT that late is fishy.
I get what you're saying. I hate refs more than anyone else on this board, but I think it's been consistent and without any blatantly bad calls.
and like the Buffs all season they can't make a damn layup.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Meh. SDSU and Boise are in 8-9 games. CSU was overseeded at 6.
Poor CSU, although I have to admit I was pulling for them just to have a CO team do well
Well, it barely worked out:
Win - 2 Team Parlay
- Michigan -2.0 (-110)Michigan (#11) @ Colorado State (#6)
- Over 137.5 (-105)Michigan (#11) @ Colorado State (#6)
Had a 3 team ML parlay.
CSU
Providence
Memphis
****ing rams.
CSU
Providence
Memphis
****ing rams.
I wasn't.
L Buff
Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left
I know you're talking about doing well in the NCAA tourney, but I think CU did pretty well this season. A 21 win season and a win over the #2 team in the nation and giving them a tough game in the conference tourney bodes well for the future IMO.
Also ... while unlike many on this board, I have no hate for CSU. But I also have to take into account that in both MBB and football we have to compete with them on in-state recruiting. I'd rather see us be in the catbird seat in that regard.
I know Boise is playing now, but SDSU plays later today too?
Yep. Creighton tonight.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Competing? There might be 1-2 kids in this state who can play at the Power 7 level.
Formerly_Medford
Well-Known Member
As much as it would destroy my bracket, I want to see Iowa lose early again.
I had CSU winning today, but losing next round, so my bracket isn't too furked.
I had CSU winning today, but losing next round, so my bracket isn't too furked.
Formerly_Medford
Well-Known Member
Yeah, If CU genuinely wants an in state kid, he's not going to CSU.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Yeah if we're competing with CSU and Wyoming for talent we're doing it wrong.
Except we don't really recruit against them.
The only time they seriously compete with us for a recruit in either sport is when that recruit is a CSU legacy.
They are a middle of the road MWC program. If we are seriously after the recruits that they are in on we will never compete in the PAC12.
This year they have far exceeded their historical norms. Part of this is getting a recruit in Roddy who did have major program interest who ended up as a much better player than he was expected to be out of HS and is their star.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Yeah. Tennessee looks like they're at about 2/3 and they're pounding Longwood....which sounds like it could be the name for an erection lasting longer than 4 hours.