That would be nice, I could retire. But first, I would have to buy a house in Boulder, that might be a stretch.You're going to get a job offer from RG if you don't watch out.
That would be nice, I could retire. But first, I would have to buy a house in Boulder, that might be a stretch.You're going to get a job offer from RG if you don't watch out.
if a married man speaks and his wife isn't there to hear it, is he still wrong?If a tree falls in the woods without anyone around does it make a sound?
not anymore.That is a tough one, is there a camera man in the living room too?
Who was the poster a few months ago who was arguing with you about CU being better off as an AD without a football program? That was funYep. Even a really bad football program with lackluster attendance and donations is still, by far, the most profitable sport in the AD and pays for all the other sports to exist. MBB is self sufficient, but they likely wouldn't be if football goes away and the University loses the Pac 12 affiliation.
If those that be talk/think it into possible existence, then it could happen? The other hand would be less students (admitted/enrolled and due to overall stagnation) = more academic prestige? This may be the collective thinking of the Administration and BoR?It’s mind boggling to me how our administration can let our academics stagnate and decay but feel like they’re Stanford or MIT
Pure insanityI’ll just leave this here.
Substantial challenge CU faces with bringing in transfers
Why did CU sign so many high school prospects in the 2022 class instead of leaving room for more transfers? NIL is not the only challenge the Buffaloes football program faces when trying to bring transfers in...247sports.com
Yes, or so I've been toldif a married man speaks and his wife isn't there to hear it, is he still wrong?
Put it this way: CU Football is going through the worst 20 year stretch in program history and it is FAR more profitable every year than the second most profitable sport, CU MBB, that is going through their best 10-12 year stretch in program history.Who was the poster a few months ago who was arguing with you about CU being better off as an AD without a football program? That was fun
That's certainly what my wife saidYes, or so I've been told
The School knows it would be devastating on a million different levels to drop football. They'll just support it enoughPut it this way: CU Football is going through the worst 20 year stretch in program history and it is FAR more profitable every year than the second most profitable sport, CU MBB, that is going through their best 10-12 year stretch in program history.
An AD without football requires one or more of the following:
1. Rabid donor base that is enthusiastic about non football sports and willing to subsidize them
2. Private, for profit, broader University model where the University pays the AD bills
3. Elite MBB program that can take over the football role in funding the rest of the sports
Since CU will never meet any one of those things, this concept of an AD is a complete non starter.
With the current situation even if CU had an elite (regular sweet 16, multiple final 4) MBB program the money would not be generated to fund the rest of the athletic department like football does.Put it this way: CU Football is going through the worst 20 year stretch in program history and it is FAR more profitable every year than the second most profitable sport, CU MBB, that is going through their best 10-12 year stretch in program history.
An AD without football requires one or more of the following:
1. Rabid donor base that is enthusiastic about non football sports and willing to subsidize them
2. Private, for profit, broader University model where the University pays the AD bills
3. Elite MBB program that can take over the football role in funding the rest of the sports
Since CU will never meet any one of those things, this concept of an AD is a complete non starter.
Narduzzi is really embarrassing himself with all his recent bull****
Post of the week awardWhat would Karl be doing in a 4* recruits living room?
Or we wait for whats next; a super league of the SEC and a few other programs. Then we play in the division below thatProbably the future of the athletic program in Boulder should they decide to go without football (or scale it back to a lower division program) would be a significant reset of the level of competition for the entire athletic program, likely to an FCS type level of competition and requiring financial contributions from the university to maintain that level.
I think that is the most logical outcome. I was just commenting on The Yak's post about what happens if the administration were to decide to cut football or cut way back on it. A lot of people don't recognize that sports like soccer, lacrosse, skiing, volleyball, track and field don't magically exist. They bring in little to no revenue but require all the expenses such as scholarships and academic support, coaching, travel, etc. etc.Or we wait for whats next; a super league of the SEC and a few other programs. Then we play in the division below that
No. We would have to if it was the other way aroundIf they cut football wouldn’t they need to cut 85 womens scholarships?
We’ll just deny it! “It was a story, fiction, an embellishment”. I’m good at PR. No problemYou must not have read the Tales of Degeneracy thread…
I’m not sure that’s true if this Q&A section on the ncaa website is correct: https://www.ncaa.org/sports/2014/1/27/title-ix-frequently-asked-questions.aspx . It likely hasn’t been challenged in the direction before. The fact that we’re even discussing it makes me want to burn my diploma.No. We would have to if it was the other way around
Part of the reason for that is our insistence on taking 50% CO kids, and CO is a relatively small state. The other reason is our outrageous out of state tuition. Lots of places to get a decent education cheaper, so CU will be relatively more attractive to rich kids from out of state who are coming here to ski and party.The dorks that run CU are pretty snooty for a school that has a USNWR ranking just a few ticks above Arizona and Arizona State.
Found our next target
Oregon Ducks punter Will Hutchinson entering transfer portal
Punter Will Hutchinson, a walk-on who handled all of the punts during UO’s spring game, announced his intent to enter the transfer portal.www.oregonlive.com
He had millions of reasons to leave.Mel is a by-product of the program being in shambles. Claiming he’s at all responsible is laughable IMO when considering how quickly he turned around MSU and how he was addressing our needs here.
No! What’s on second! Why is in third!Why what?
Sorry if someone already posted this, I skipped over the last few pages of this thread
Based on what metric?Part of the reason for that is our insistence on taking 50% CO kids, and CO is a relatively small state. The other reason is our outrageous out of state tuition. Lots of places to get a decent education cheaper, so CU will be relatively more attractive to rich kids from out of state who are coming here to ski and party.
And zero reasons to stay after CU failed to follow through with anything they said they would do. Changing the transfer admission rules was one of the big onesHe had millions of reasons to leave.