He's going to get some big offer$
MikMac will not let him get away, WTTF!He's going to get some big offer$
‘Cause Landman took his somewhat limited physical skills to the NFL because of his college coaching.
I think there’s really a limit to how far a position coach can help. I leaning into the idea that the most important thing position coaches in CFB do is recruit—and pump up the sidelines?
This would make an allsome signature!I'm not arguing. I just think it's funny.
IMO, this is where I think Sapp will excel beyond expectations. If he recruits a group that commits to the work, then the one-on-one tutelage from an NFL HOF will pay in spades.‘Cause Landman took his somewhat limited physical skills to the NFL because of his college coaching.
I think there’s really a limit to how far a position coach can help. I leaning into the idea that the most important thing position coaches in CFB do is recruit—and pump up the sidelines?
I think this is the new normal. Most of D1 will be feeder programs that lose their best players to transfer. Those who can shop in the portal and get what they want will be following the Coach Prime recruiting model of signing only around 15 preps per year.Have a source at a big P5 school. He said names you wouldn't even think would enter the portal will enter. That's how much money is out there for the taking. Schools like USC, A&M, Texas, etc are gonna thrive off this.
I think you're right.I think this is the new normal. Most of D1 will be feeder programs that lose their best players to transfer. Those who can shop in the portal and get what they want will be following the Coach Prime recruiting model of signing only around 15 preps per year.
Big Ten/SEC Teams > High Tier D1 Teams > Lower Tier D1 Teams > D2/Ivy League/HBCU > JUCOI think you're right.
And I think the additional effort and cost that comes with all that turnover is going to really hurt schools outside of the P2 (and a few others). this could dramatically increase the probability of a near-term break-off of the P2 from the rest of the D1/FBS.
Currently, 12 of the top 13 in the rankings are teams that will be in the SEC or B1G next year. The only exception is FSU, which has said it is pursuing an out from the ACC. Basically, if we had the 12-team playoff it would pretty much be a B1G-SEC showdown.I think you're right.
And I think the additional effort and cost that comes with all that turnover is going to really hurt schools outside of the P2 (and a few others). this could dramatically increase the probability of a near-term break-off of the P2 from the rest of the D1/FBS.
Well, the new Big 12, ACC and G5 Champs would also be included, but yes, your point is generally accurateCurrently, 12 of the top 13 in the rankings are teams that will be in the SEC or B1G next year. The only exception is FSU, which has said it is pursuing an out from the ACC. Basically, if we had the 12-team playoff it would pretty much be a B1G-SEC showdown.
Currently, 12 of the top 13 in the rankings are teams that will be in the SEC or B1G next year. The only exception is FSU, which has said it is pursuing an out from the ACC. Basically, if we had the 12-team playoff it would pretty much be a B1G-SEC showdown.
so, based on current standings and assuming the off-season realignment already happened, the 12 teams getting into a hypothetical playoff would be:G5 Champs would also be incl
What’s new about that hierarchy? Outside of a few schools that recently joined the B1G/SEC, that’s been the norm for decades.Big Ten/SEC Teams > High Tier D1 Teams > Lower Tier D1 Teams > D2/Ivy League/HBCU > JUCO
This is the new hierarchy we will see transfer portal players climb. There is a reason why Georgia players are worth hundreds of thousands of $.
As conferences the Big Ten and SEC were not the cream for decades.What’s new about that hierarchy? Outside of a few schools that recently joined the B1G/SEC, that’s been the norm for decades.
I started to post that, citing Clemson and FSU (and USC and Texas and a few others), but I think NW has a good point -- you can look at the top ten back in 2003 and the trend had already started of the SEC and B1G rising to the top.As conferences the Big Ten and SEC were not the cream for decades.
Washington would be B1G. And the auto bids would be the only thing preventing 11 & 12 from being Ole Miss & Oklahoma from the SEC.so, based on current standings and assuming the off-season realignment already happened, the 12 teams getting into a hypothetical playoff would be:
- Georgia (SEC auto)
- Michigan (B1G auto)
- Washington (Pac auto)
- FSU (ACC auto)
- Oregon
- OSU
- Texas
- Alabama
- Missouri
- Penn State
- Tulane (American auto)
- Ok State (XII auto)
He’s right about the teams that will be in the future B1G and SEC, but as conferences, the Big 8/12, Pac 10 and ACC were every bit as dominant as the other two.I started to post that, citing Clemson and FSU (and USC and Texas and a few others), but I think NW has a good point -- you can look at the top ten back in 2003 and the trend had already started of the SEC and B1G rising to the top.
I think you're both right
thanks. I'm a moron. I think it would be this (didn't find anything explicit, but I'm assuming ND gets no special consideration here)Washington would be B1G. And the auto bids would be the only thing preventing 11 & 12 from being Ole Miss & Oklahoma from the SEC.
Wow. That is huge and distressing for me as an Arky fan. He is an awesome player. But OC number three incoming probably makes it easy to leave.Arkansas is falling apart. Crickets from the media
Which is why I added the qualifier about schools those two conferences have absorbed, eg - usc, Texas, Oklahoma, etcAs conferences the Big Ten and SEC were not the cream for decades.
Trent Dilfer is the first HC I've heard embrace mindset B. His pitch to recruits is that he will help them get development, exposure/PT, and assist with them parlaying that into getting paid via the portal. Went 4-8 in his 1st year (first year in the AAC) and it will be interesting to see if UAB attracts prep talent this way to gain competitive advantage in its conference.Mindset A: If I'm San Jose States head coach and we go up 2 TD's. I'm intentionally calling plays to keep the best players stats down going forward. I'm resting them earlier in each game and if I have a reasonable backup at QB I'm giving him a series or 2 each game to keep my starters numbers down and cast doubt on why he isn't playing all 4 Quarters. I'm not openly saying any of this but I'm absolutely creating an environment where more players are getting snaps and my best players are seeing the field less to limit their opportunities to move on to a Georgia.
Mindset B: Become a feeder school for a program and hopefully you get recruits to play for you because they know you can help them get to Georgia/Alabama/Michigan/USC in 2-3 years. Rinse and repeat and never have a chance at playing for a championship or anything that's actually interesting. Goal is to win your conference, keep your job, and possibly get an invitation to the big leagues of coaching someday.
Trent Dilfer is the first HC I've heard embrace mindset B. His pitch to recruits is that he will help them get development, exposure/PT, and assist with them parlaying that into getting paid via the portal. Went 4-8 in his 1st year (first year in the AAC) and it will be interesting to see if UAB attracts prep talent this way to gain competitive advantage in its conference.
Arkansas is falling apart. Crickets from the media
I think that Arkansas folks are going to look at it with Pittman & Odom like aTm folks did with Fisher & Elko - that the guy who left and did well was the reason for the success their HC previously had.Pittman being the first coach fired during the 2024 season seems like a lock.
I think Odom is underrated.I think that Arkansas folks are going to look at it with Pittman & Odom like aTm folks did with Fisher & Elko - that the guy who left and did well was the reason for the success their HC previously had.