LongHaulBuff
Club Member
Did that team have Jack McDowell on it?You're not forgiven for the 1993 ALCS, I thought the Sox were going to take the whole damn thing that year. McGriff was gone by then, SD, I think? I just had to wait 12 more years.
Did that team have Jack McDowell on it?You're not forgiven for the 1993 ALCS, I thought the Sox were going to take the whole damn thing that year. McGriff was gone by then, SD, I think? I just had to wait 12 more years.
Yep, I never liked that prick. Pretty sure, he won the Cy Young that year. When Nolan Ryan and Ventura had their little scuffle, I want to say it was '93 or '94, or so? He's lucky that big guy didn't kick his ass for him. McDowell was talking **** apparently, but behind a few other folks, shocking.Did that team have Jack McDowell on it?
Didn't know he was a doosh. I remember wishing the Jays had him. The '92-'93 seasons were amazing. I thought they had it in '85 vs the Royals but they blew that.Yep, I never liked that prick. Pretty sure, he won the Cy Young that year. When Nolan Ryan and Ventura had their little scuffle, I want to say it was '93 or '94, or so? He's lucky that big guy didn't kick his ass for him. McDowell was talking **** apparently, but behind a few other folks, shocking.
Chev will be calling the plays.
Year | Playcaller | PPG | Pac-12 Rank |
2019 | Jay Johnson | 24.2 | 10th |
2018 | Darrin Chiaverini | 27.1 | 7th |
2017 | Brian Lindgren | 26.4 | 11th |
2016 | Brian Lindgren | 31.3 | 7th |
2015 | Brian Lindgren | 24.6 | 11th |
2014 | Brian Lindgren | 28.5 | 10th |
2013 | Brian Lindgren | 25.4 | 11th |
2012 | Eric Bieniemy | 17.8 | 12th |
2011 | Eric Bieniemy | 19.8 | 12th |
Doooooooom!!!That's what I call a drought. Jeesh.
Year Playcaller PPG Pac-12 Rank 2019 Jay Johnson 24.2 10th 2018 Darrin Chiaverini 27.1 7th 2017 Brian Lindgren 26.4 11th 2016 Brian Lindgren 31.3 7th 2015 Brian Lindgren 24.6 11th 2014 Brian Lindgren 28.5 10th 2013 Brian Lindgren 25.4 11th 2012 Eric Bieniemy 17.8 12th 2011 Eric Bieniemy 19.8 12th
Judging by your avatar nothing this man does will be a "good look" to you.Dorrell went against his original stated intentions of having an experienced play caller. It appears he acquiesced to Chiv’s campaigning and possible leverage to his role with recruits. This is not a good look for Karl Dorrell.
Thanks for the reminder. My post still stands.Judging by your avatar nothing this man does will be a "good look" to you.
Dorrell went against his original stated intentions of having an experienced play caller. It appears he acquiesced to Chiv’s campaigning and possible leverage to his role with recruits. This is not a good look for Karl Dorrell.
I like the staff support for Chiv, absent last time. His success will depending on his humility, willingness to ask for and receive assistance and his opportunities to listen. These are signs of maturity. The jury is out, at least for me. Maybe Dorrell is exactly what he needed at this stage in his career, especially off the field.He was more emphatic in his original conversations with the press that he (Dorrell) would not be calling plays, choosing instead to focus on being an all-around head coach. But your point still stands, he hasn’t grabbed a really experienced OC. I will say this, though, there are four coaches that have called plays on staff - Dorrell, Chev, Rodrigue, and Langsdorf. We’ll see how that plays out.
The avatar still and will continue to make the post null and void.Thanks for the reminder. My post still stands.
I like the staff support for Chiv, absent last time. His success will depending on his humility, willingness to ask for and receive assistance and his opportunities to listen. These are signs of maturity. The jury is out, at least for me. Maybe Dorrell is exactly what he needed at this stage in his career, especially off the field.
Yes. The site would not let me change it. I’ll try again. The content seems to bother you. That’s OK.The avatar still and will continue to make the post null and void.
Doesn't make any sense (per usual for Hawg) but it "stands"? Stands for what?Thanks for the reminder. My post still stands.
The jury is definitely still out, but I’m ok with giving Chev another shot. Clean slate for me. As the stats above show, it’s not like he was worse than either Johnson or Lindgren (and actually better statistically although doesn’t mean that much with all the variables).
I’d like to see what Chev can do with better personnel. Remember in 2018, he had OL Coach Adams rolling out Kaiser-Tonz-Pursell-Lynott-Haigler (Lynott coming off injury, Pursell young, Tonz and Haigler quit football with eligibility remaining), Lindsay was being replaced as the feature back, and Montez was, well, Montez. That was not an offense built for much success.
I guess I can see giving him another shot, but my worry is the contract he was given (raise and new three-year deal) may make it nearly impossible to fire him if things go poorly again.
At least he won't be pushed by Mickey Mac to: 1) get that 1,000 yds for Trayvon; 2) always look for your one go-to guy; or 3) shut things down, when the score gets too high. Oh, almost forgot: Completely ignore your TE, except as a blocker.I guess I can see giving him another shot, but my worry is the contract he was given (raise and new three-year deal) may make it nearly impossible to fire him if things go poorly again.
It doesn't bother me at all. I just think it's weird to have a coach on another staff wearing that teams colors and logo as an avatar. Not something that as a true fan would ever cross my mind.Yes. The site would not let me change it. I’ll try again. The content seems to bother you. That’s OK.
I don’t think you would want fire him any way. Take the play calling away from him and keep him recruiting for CU. Hopefully, it’s a moot point.I guess I can see giving him another shot, but my worry is the contract he was given (raise and new three-year deal) may make it nearly impossible to fire him if things go poorly again.
I don’t think you would want fire him any way. Take the play calling away from him and keep him recruiting for CU. Hopefully, it’s a moot point.
Over time I have convinced myself that Chev will work as the OC under HCKD. He has a lot more support this time around with both Dorrell and Langsdorf there. The key for me is if Rodrigue can provide a solid Oline. Very few OC can be successful without winning the trenches. I have convinced myself that Rodrigue is going to be good too.
In my opinion, Rick George should have extended Kap before hiring a head coach.
That isn’t a unilateral transaction. Kap was in high demand before Tucker left, why would he sign in advance of knowing who he would be working for?
Stands for my opinion. It was very clear.Doesn't make any sense (per usual for Hawg) but it "stands"? Stands for what?
The key will be Chiv’s humility, willingness to ask for and receive help and listening to others.I don’t think you would want fire him any way. Take the play calling away from him and keep him recruiting for CU. Hopefully, it’s a moot point.
Over time I have convinced myself that Chev will work as the OC under HCKD. He has a lot more support this time around with both Dorrell and Langsdorf there. The key for me is if Rodrigue can provide a solid Oline. Very few OC can be successful without winning the trenches. I have convinced myself that Rodrigue is going to be good too.
I can see why you would want this, but the wrong thing for an exec to do.In my opinion, Rick George should have extended Kap before hiring a head coach. Tough thing to force on an incoming coach, but I would’ve been prepared to eat Kap’s guaranteed salary in a bid to retain him. Thought not going that route was a mistake, especially if reports that he and family really liked living in Colorado were true.
What do you want Chiv to have learned, and how/when was he supposed to have learned it?Even Bill Belichek wasn't successful the first go around. I am hopeful Chev has learnt from his first go around as OC. It is a great opportunity for him. RPO is the best offense that fits the skill set of both our young QBs. Got to be a balanced offense. Also need to be able to make adjustments.