What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CFP Race 2024

I am convinced one reason they don’t just go to a straight playoff format is that fans and talking heads love arguing and speculating about it endlessly. That in turn creates more buzz and interest overall and generates better ratings and a lot more money. A straight playoff would be relatively boring.
Which is why I preferred the old pre-Bowl Alliance bowl system.
You could conceivably have 3 bowl games on the same day that could be a national championship game. Then EVERYONE would be talking about the outcome all offseason.
 
Which is why I preferred the old pre-Bowl Alliance bowl system.
You could conceivably have 3 bowl games on the same day that could be a national championship game. Then EVERYONE would be talking about the outcome all offseason.
Pre-BCS when the Rose, Sugar, Orange, Cotton and Fiesta were all on New Year's Day and mattered was pretty damn good.

That's never coming back, though. We all know where this is going - NFL model on alignment and playoffs.
 
Pre-BCS when the Rose, Sugar, Orange, Cotton and Fiesta were all on New Year's Day and mattered was pretty damn good.

That's never coming back, though. We all know where this is going - NFL model on alignment and playoffs.
i think you have to applaud the effort to crown a "true" and "consensus" national champion ... and that can only happen on the field with teams facing each other

i admittedly dont remember "the old days" and my first conscious memory is tennessee with tee martin but i think the sport is messy enough as is so i appreciate the effort to "clean up the championship process" but i also realise that the messiness factor is part of the appeal for some ... but to me the bowls always were glorified exhibition games
 
but to me the bowls always were glorified exhibition games
eric cartman GIF by South Park


They were still glorious.

The mess of #1 playing #12 and #2 playing #6, and #s 3 & 4 playing each other, and #5 getting stuck in a second tier location playing a non ranked team set up off-seasons of **** talking that will never be paralleled.

It also meant that losing any single game against any opponent at any point in the season could end a title run - which meant that every single game simply mattered more.
 
i think you have to applaud the effort to crown a "true" and "consensus" national champion ... and that can only happen on the field with teams facing each other

i admittedly dont remember "the old days" and my first conscious memory is tennessee with tee martin but i think the sport is messy enough as is so i appreciate the effort to "clean up the championship process" but i also realise that the messiness factor is part of the appeal for some ... but to me the bowls always were glorified exhibition games
It wasn't a good system, but it had its charm and I have some great childhood memories of NYD stacking 3 TVs in the family room with my dad to watch all the games. It was also meaningful to teams, students and fans when even if there wasn't a national championship on the line, winning the Big 8 and going to the Orange Bowl was huge.

It was better than the BCS and 4-team playoff eras. But just as 4 teams was an improvement over 2, we'll see 12 as an improvement while still not feeling completely satisfied. We're still a few moves from the endpoint, I think.
 
eric cartman GIF by South Park


They were still glorious.

The mess of #1 playing #12 and #2 playing #6, and #s 3 & 4 playing each other, and #5 getting stuck in a second tier location playing a non ranked team set up off-seasons of **** talking that will never be paralleled.


It also meant that losing any single game against any opponent at any point in the season could end a title run - which meant that every single game simply mattered more.
yes, part of me has always thought that part of the appeal cfb has for some was the pretty much endless reason for discussion as it was and probably still is next to impossible to crown a "real" champion ... but i like fairness
 
It wasn't a good system, but it had its charm and I have some great childhood memories of NYD stacking 3 TVs in the family room with my dad to watch all the games. It was also meaningful to teams, students and fans when even if there wasn't a national championship on the line, winning the Big 8 and going to the Orange Bowl was huge.

It was better than the BCS and 4-team playoff eras. But just as 4 teams was an improvement over 2, we'll see 12 as an improvement while still not feeling completely satisfied. We're still a few moves from the endpoint, I think.
we are, but therell never be a system that satisfies everyone as thatd presumably take at least a 20 game season and im not sure were ever getting there
 
You also cannot overestimate the regional nature of college football before the huge TV contracts. Bowl games were opportunities to see teams you rarely watched, if at all.
yep, internet plays a role here as well but i saw a similar development in soccer ... 20 years ago id see some teams and players maybe one or two times a season if they were playing in a big game or against my team in an international competition, nowadays with the internet i could probably follow the entire career of temple's back up qb if i wanted
 
yep, internet plays a role here as well but i saw a similar development in soccer ... 20 years ago id see some teams and players maybe one or two times a season if they were playing in a big game or against my team in an international competition, nowadays with the internet i could probably follow the entire career of temple's back up qb if i wanted
When I was a kid, the west coast games often didn't finish early enough for the AP story and box score to make the Sunday paper. It wasn't easy to find the result of a Lakers, Dodgers or USC game.
 
When I was a kid, the west coast games often didn't finish early enough for the AP story and box score to make the Sunday paper. It wasn't easy to find the result of a Lakers, Dodgers or USC game.
and how many games did you have on tv every week?
 
and how many games did you have on tv every week?
Before cable, maybe 6. I had 3 main networks and then the NYC/Philly local channels which would give me some small conference or an Ivy in addition to the main network stuff.
 
Before cable, maybe 6. I had 3 main networks and then the NYC/Philly local channels which would give me some small conference or an Ivy in addition to the main network stuff.
so you essentially saw the west coast teams in the bowls and maybe once if they happened to play one of "your" teams ooc, i assume
 
so you essentially saw the west coast teams in the bowls and maybe once if they happened to play one of "your" teams ooc, i assume
Yeah. Big 8, I'd see OU-NU and maybe another one if there was a highly ranked team playing one of them. Pac-10, maybe 1 game other than USC-Notre Dame every year. I mostly got a heavy dose of Penn State, Notre Dame, and Eastern independents (which pretty much became the Big East).
 
eric cartman GIF by South Park


They were still glorious.

The mess of #1 playing #12 and #2 playing #6, and #s 3 & 4 playing each other, and #5 getting stuck in a second tier location playing a non ranked team set up off-seasons of **** talking that will never be paralleled.

It also meant that losing any single game against any opponent at any point in the season could end a title run - which meant that every single game simply mattered more.
THIS is exactly what I’m ****ing taking about.
Now, once the season is over, everyone is like 🤷🏻‍♂️…basketball.
Before, it was non-stop **** talk until September. And bowl games were ABSOLUTELY NOT glorified exhibition games. They were for legit standings and championships.
 
You also cannot overestimate the regional nature of college football before the huge TV contracts. Bowl games were opportunities to see teams you rarely watched, if at all.
Growing up in California, all I ever saw was Pac-12, Notre Dame, and sometimes Mich v Ohio St. Then out of nowhere I was watching Penn St v Miami in 1987 rooting for PSU…for no reason.
 
Why is Fanduel already accepting bets for a Tennessee/OSU first round game? OSU -7.5, btw.
 
Projected bracket that’s highly likely and just cancelled bets if that’s not the matchup

What would that be? 8/9?

My (stupid) predictions:

1. Oregon
2. Georgia (gross)
3. Boise (grosser)
4. ASU
5. Texas
6. Notre Dame
7. Penn State
8. Ohio State
9. Tennessee
10. Indiana
11. SMU
12. Clemson
 
What would that be? 8/9?

My (stupid) predictions:

1. Oregon
2. Georgia (gross)
3. Boise (grosser)
4. ASU
5. Texas
6. Notre Dame
7. Penn State
8. Ohio State
9. Tennessee
10. Indiana
11. SMU
12. Clemson

Yes 8/9 would almost definitely be the matchup for the Tenn-tOSU game
 
What would that be? 8/9?

My (stupid) predictions:

1. Oregon
2. Georgia (gross)
3. Boise (grosser)
4. ASU
5. Texas
6. Notre Dame
7. Penn State
8. Ohio State
9. Tennessee
10. Indiana
11. SMU
12. Clemson
ND path to the championship would go through smu and Boise 🤮
 
Back
Top