Mizzou needs to stay in to help prop up the SEC SOS
The problem is that right now Boise is 4 spots ahead of CU meaning they would have to go against their current rankings if both CU and Boise win out and just put CU ahead of them. If a 2 loss CU team isn't ranked higher than a 1 loss BSU team now, why would you just assume CU would jump them three weeks from now?We're not going to be the 12th seed if we win the Big 12. Boise will be. Their SOS is going to drop below us soon, and they really don't have a good argument for the bye outside of that moral victory in Eugene.
If BYU loses again, the committee is likely dropping them into the late 20s or maybe even out altogether. If we play and beat a 20something BYU or ASU team in the CCG, I don't think it's a guarantee we jump Boise. Still likely, but definitely not guaranteed.Guys, again - we would jump Boise after a CCG if we beat a ranked team who has ranked wins while Boise beats a team (we already beat easily) who has 0 ranking and 0 ranked wins
All you need to worry about is your holiday bowl flights after losing to Kansas
If BYU loses, then they swap spots with ASU. We would then be playing a top 15ish ASU which would be a signature win.If BYU loses again, the committee is likely dropping them into the late 20s or maybe even out altogether. If we play and beat a 20something BYU or ASU team in the CCG, I don't think it's a guarantee we jump Boise. Still likely, but definitely not guaranteed.
???We're not going to be the 12th seed if we win the Big 12. Boise will be. Their SOS is going to drop below us soon, and they really don't have a good argument for the bye outside of that moral victory in Eugene.
???
Where are you looking that BSUs SOS is better than CUs right now?
And all this **** is irrelevant cause we are losing to kansas
NGL - pretty pissed that we're only 16th. It seems like a setup to have us going to either Eugene or Columbus for the first round of the playoffs.
this is all about optics and feeling good. if we win out, which as you note, is not a sure thing, we will have a first round bye.Guys, again - we would jump Boise after a CCG if we beat a ranked team who has ranked wins while Boise beats a team (we already beat easily) who has 0 ranking and 0 ranked wins
All you need to worry about is your holiday bowl flights after losing to Kansas
That guy is an idiot. Most SOS have CU higher or much higher
This had to have been where I saw that. I thought somebody with more credibility had that.
Assuming CU ends up being Big 12 champs:
Would you rather get the 4-seed with a bye and locked in for 2nd round at a bowl site or a 5-8 seed hosting a 1st round playoff game at Folsom?
I think I'd prefer the home playoff game, but don't have a strong preference either way.
I also think that if CU wins its next 3 games we'll end up in the top 8 (from 16 now).
In short, it's all good if CU takes care of its business.
Assuming CU ends up being Big 12 champs:
Would you rather get the 4-seed with a bye and locked in for 2nd round at a bowl site or a 5-8 seed hosting a 1st round playoff game at Folsom?
I think I'd prefer the home playoff game, but don't have a strong preference either way.
I also think that if CU wins its next 3 games we'll end up in the top 8 (from 16 now).
In short, it's all good if CU takes care of its business.
Assuming CU ends up being Big 12 champs:
Would you rather get the 4-seed with a bye and locked in for 2nd round at a bowl site or a 5-8 seed hosting a 1st round playoff game at Folsom?
I think I'd prefer the home playoff game, but don't have a strong preference either way.
I also think that if CU wins its next 3 games we'll end up in the top 8 (from 16 now).
In short, it's all good if CU takes care of its business.
It's Vandy, by a FG.Tell me so far is Texass' best win?
What if they lose to Texass A&M ?
Conference | Team | AP Rank | CFP Rank | W | L | Con W | Con L | 11/23 | 11/30 | CCG | Best Win(s) | Losses | ESPN SOR |
SEC | Texas | 3 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 1 | Kentucky | at Texas A&M | win and in | Vandy+3 | Georgia-(15) | 5 |
SEC | Alabama | 7 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | at Oklahoma | Auburn | win and in??? | Georgia+7,Mizzou+34,SCaro+2 | atVandy(-5),atTenn(-7) | 7 |
SEC | Ole Miss | 8 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | at Florida | Miss State | need help | atSCaro+24,Georgia+18 | Kentucky(-3),atLSU(-3) | 12 |
SEC | Georgia | 9 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 2 | UMass | GaTech | need help | nClem+31,atTex+15,Tenn+14 | atBama(-7),atOleMiss(-18) | 2 |
SEC | Tennessee | 10 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 2 | UTEP | at Vandy | need help | Bama+7 | atArk.(-5),atGeorgia-(14) | 10 |
SEC | Texas A&M | 15 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | at Auburn | Texas | win and in | Mizzou+31 | ND(-10), atS.Car(-24) | 11 |
B1G | Oregon | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 8 | 0 | BYE | Washington | IN | Boise+3, tOSU+1,Illinois+29 | 1 | |
B1G | Ohio State | 2 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 1 | Indiana | Michigan | win and in | atPennSt+7 | atOregon(-1) | 3 |
B1G | Penn State | 4 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 1 | at Minnesota | Maryland | need help | Illinois+14 | tOSU(-7) | 4 |
B1G | Indiana | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 0 | at Ohio State | Purdue | win and in | Washington+14 | 6 | |
ACC | Miami | 11 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 1 | Wake | at Cuse | win and in | atL'ville+7 | atGTech(-5) | 9 |
ACC | SMU | 13 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 0 | at Virginia | Cal | win and in | Pitt+23 | BYU(-3) | 14 |
ACC | Clemson | 17 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 1 | Citadel | So. Carolina | need help | atPitt+4 | nGeorgia(-31),Lville(-12) | 17 |
XII | BYU | 14 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 1 | at AZ State | Houston | win and in | atSMU+3 | Kansas(-4) | 8 |
XII | Colorado | 16 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 1 | at Kansas | Ok State | win and in | atTexTech+14 | atNebraska(-18),KsSt(-3) | 21 |
XII | Arizona State | 21 | 21 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 2 | BYU | at Arizona | win and in | atKansSt+10 | atTxTech(-8),atCincy(-10) | 18 |
XII | Iowa State | 22 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 2 | at Utah | Kansas State | need help | atIowa+1 | TxTech(-1),atKansas(-9) | 22 |
Ind. | Notre Dame | 6 | 6 | 9 | 1 | n/a | n/a | at Army | at USC | n/a | atTexAM+10 | No.Ill.(-2) | 13 |
MWC | Boise State | 12 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 0 | at Wyoming | Oregon St | likely CSU | WashSt+21 | atOregon(-3) | 15 |
AAC | Army | 18 | 19 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 0 | Notre Dame | UTSA | vs Tulane | ECU+17 | 19 | |
AAC | Tulane | 20 | 20 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | BYE | Memphis | vs Army | atNavy+35 | KsSt(-7),atOkla(-15) | 27 |
I don’t really see a scenario where we get a home playoff game. A lot of football left but the amount of teams ahead of us who aren’t likely going to lose makes a 5-8 seed highly unlikely.Assuming CU ends up being Big 12 champs:
Would you rather get the 4-seed with a bye and locked in for 2nd round at a bowl site or a 5-8 seed hosting a 1st round playoff game at Folsom?
I think I'd prefer the home playoff game, but don't have a strong preference either way.
I also think that if CU wins its next 3 games we'll end up in the top 8 (from 16 now).
In short, it's all good if CU takes care of its business.
I would even upgrade Texas to low-midLooking at this weekend and running the games through my proprietary upset alert algorithm, there are a lot of higher ranked teams that are on upset alert this weekend. CU could make some big moves this weekend.
#1 Oregon - off
#5 IU @ #2 tOSU - upset potential = medium
KY @ #3 Texas - upset potential = nil
#4 PSU @ Minn. - upset potential = HIGH
#19 Army v. #6 ND - upset potential = low
#7 Bama v. Okla - upset potential = medium
WF @ #8 Miami - upset potential = nil
#9 Ole Miss @ UF - upset potential = HIGH
UMass @ #10 UGA - upset potential = nil
UTEP @ #11 Tenn - upset potential = nil
#12 BSU @ Wyo - upset potential = low to nil
#13 SMU @ UVA - upset potential = medium
#14 BYU @ #21 ASU - upset potential = OFF THE CHARTS HIGH
#15 aTm @ Auburn - upset potential = medium to low-high
#16 CU @ KU - upset potential = low
Yes, and uterus and atm have not played in several years, which just increases the game's profile and potential for both teams to be looking ahead.I would even upgrade Texas to low-mid
They’ve played pretty soft and Kentucky is a vintage trap game before the A&M game. Wouldn’t be surprised if this one is squirrelly