Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Class ranks by average # of P5 offers (from 2012 on)

FM-Buff said:
Current 247 Rankings for CU:
12 Commits
0 5-Star
1 4-Star
10 3-Star
86.51 Avg Player rating
10th in PAC 12 Rank
65 Overall Rank

Should be fun seeing the difference from today to signing day.
Click to expand...
Pretty stark difference from 6 weeks ago.
(These are HS and JUCO numbers).

19 commits
1 5-Star
4 4-Star
15 3-Star
87.56 Avg Player Rating
5th in Pac 12 Rank
29 Overall Rank
 
FM-Buff said:
Pretty stark difference from 6 weeks ago.
(These are HS and JUCO numbers).

19 commits
1 5-Star
4 4-Star
15 3-Star
87.56 Avg Player Rating
5th in Pac 12 Rank
29 Overall Rank
Click to expand...
lil wayne celebration GIF
 
Coach Prime in a different world…

A reminder on the methodology: I used the offers reported by 247 (not perfect), and my analysis was done fairly quickly but I’m sure it’s directional correct. I capped the number of offers used for my average at 10 (so one member of a class with 25 offers doesn’t distort the averages).


2012 - AVG 3.88 - Players with 10+ P5 offers Y. Wright, K. Crawley
2013 - 1.95 - None - Notable: S. Liufau (1), T. Thompson (6), P. Lindsay (1)
2014 - 1.5 - None - Notable: S. Fields (5)
2015 - 1.78 - None - Notable: Lynott (8), P. Carr (8)
2016 - 4.1 - Bisharat, Winfree, J. Huntley,
2017 - 4.66 - Moretti, KD Nixon, G. Polley, K. Ray, Viska Shenault, T. Lang, T. Lytle
2018 - 4.26 - I. Antwine, D. Smith
2019 - 4.15 - L. Shenault, J. Mangham, L. Murray Jr.
2020 - 6.54 - B. Lewis, B. Rice, J. Wray, C. Fauria, C. Lee, K. Miller, A. Clayton, C. Gonzalez, J. Berry, J. Harris
2021 - 3.9 - E. Olsen
2022 - 4.84 - D. Dixson, V. Venn, A. Smith - Notable: A. Austin (9), S. Bowser (9), G. Page (9)
2023 - 6ish (this is challenging to calculate with 40+ new players, plus three specialists and some depth pieces) - T. Hunter, Shedeur Sanders, D. Edwards, A. Waseem, I. Hardge, J. Page, S. Coats (9), T. McCoy (9), V. Johnson (8), I. Jatta (8)
2024 - 8.2 - everybody except T. Chandler has 10+ P5 offers
 
A reminder on the methodology: I used the offers reported by 247 (not perfect), and my analysis was done fairly quickly but I’m sure it’s directional correct. I capped the number of offers used for my average at 10 (so one member of a class with 25 offers doesn’t distort the averages).


2012 - AVG 3.88 - Players with 10+ P5 offers Y. Wright, K. Crawley
2013 - 1.95 - None - Notable: S. Liufau (1), T. Thompson (6), P. Lindsay (1)
2014 - 1.5 - None - Notable: S. Fields (5)
2015 - 1.78 - None - Notable: Lynott (8), P. Carr (8)
2016 - 4.1 - Bisharat, Winfree, J. Huntley,
2017 - 4.66 - Moretti, KD Nixon, G. Polley, K. Ray, Viska Shenault, T. Lang, T. Lytle
2018 - 4.26 - I. Antwine, D. Smith
2019 - 4.15 - L. Shenault, J. Mangham, L. Murray Jr.
2020 - 6.54 - B. Lewis, B. Rice, J. Wray, C. Fauria, C. Lee, K. Miller, A. Clayton, C. Gonzalez, J. Berry, J. Harris
2021 - 3.9 - E. Olsen
2022 - 4.84 - D. Dixson, V. Venn, A. Smith - Notable: A. Austin (9), S. Bowser (9), G. Page (9)
2023 - 6ish (this is challenging to calculate with 40+ new players, plus three specialists and some depth pieces) - T. Hunter, Shedeur Sanders, D. Edwards, A. Waseem, I. Hardge, J. Page, S. Coats (9), T. McCoy (9), V. Johnson (8), I. Jatta (8)
2024 - 9.3 - which is Alabama/Georgia territory everybody except the JC OT has 10+ P5 offers (high school class only)
 
KCM said:
A reminder on the methodology: I used the offers reported by 247 (not perfect), and my analysis was done fairly quickly but I’m sure it’s directional correct. I capped the number of offers used for my average at 10 (so one member of a class with 25 offers doesn’t distort the averages).


2012 - AVG 3.88 - Players with 10+ P5 offers Y. Wright, K. Crawley
2013 - 1.95 - None - Notable: S. Liufau (1), T. Thompson (6), P. Lindsay (1)
2014 - 1.5 - None - Notable: S. Fields (5)
2015 - 1.78 - None - Notable: Lynott (8), P. Carr (8)
2016 - 4.1 - Bisharat, Winfree, J. Huntley,
2017 - 4.66 - Moretti, KD Nixon, G. Polley, K. Ray, Viska Shenault, T. Lang, T. Lytle
2018 - 4.26 - I. Antwine, D. Smith
2019 - 4.15 - L. Shenault, J. Mangham, L. Murray Jr.
2020 - 6.54 - B. Lewis, B. Rice, J. Wray, C. Fauria, C. Lee, K. Miller, A. Clayton, C. Gonzalez, J. Berry, J. Harris
2021 - 3.9 - E. Olsen
2022 - 4.84 - D. Dixson, V. Venn, A. Smith - Notable: A. Austin (9), S. Bowser (9), G. Page (9)
2023 - 6ish (this is challenging to calculate with 40+ new players, plus three specialists and some depth pieces) - T. Hunter, Shedeur Sanders, D. Edwards, A. Waseem, I. Hardge, J. Page, S. Coats (9), T. McCoy (9), V. Johnson (8), I. Jatta (8)
2024 - 9.3 - which is Alabama/Georgia territory everybody except the JC OT has 10+ P5 offers (high school class only)
Click to expand...
Episode 7 Wow GIF by Wrexham AFC
 
KCM said:
reminder on the methodology: I used the offers reported by 247 (not perfect), and my analysis was done fairly quickly but I’m sure it’s directional correct. I capped the number of offers used for my average at 10 (so one member of a class with 25 offers doesn’t distort the averages).


2012 - AVG 3.88 - Players with 10+ P5 offers Y. Wright, K. Crawley
2013 - 1.95 - None - Notable: S. Liufau (1), T. Thompson (6), P. Lindsay (1)
2014 - 1.5 - None - Notable: S. Fields (5)
2015 - 1.78 - None - Notable: Lynott (8), P. Carr (8)
2016 - 4.1 - Bisharat, Winfree, J. Huntley,
2017 - 4.66 - Moretti, KD Nixon, G. Polley, K. Ray, Viska Shenault, T. Lang, T. Lytle
2018 - 4.26 - I. Antwine, D. Smith
2019 - 4.15 - L. Shenault, J. Mangham, L. Murray Jr.
2020 - 6.54 - B. Lewis, B. Rice, J. Wray, C. Fauria, C. Lee, K. Miller, A. Clayton, C. Gonzalez, J. Berry, J. Harris
2021 - 3.9 - E. Olsen
2022 - 4.84 - D. Dixson, V. Venn, A. Smith - Notable: A. Austin (9), S. Bowser (9), G. Page (9)
2023 - 6ish (this is challenging to calculate with 40+ new players, plus three specialists and some depth pieces) - T. Hunter, Shedeur Sanders, D. Edwards, A. Waseem, I. Hardge, J. Page, S. Coats (9), T. McCoy (9), V. Johnson (8), I. Jatta (8)
2024 - 9.3 - which is Alabama/Georgia territory everybody except the JC OT has 10+ P5 offers (high school class only)
Click to expand...
Abc Thumbs Up GIF by The Bachelorette
 
I was just looking at 247 because, amidst all the negative press we've seen in recent weeks about the state of recruiting, I wanted to see where we sit in our new conference. When you look at the overall ranking, we are currently 4th, behind: Texas Tech, TCU and UCF. (Much better than I feared.)

If you sort by average recruit ranking, CU is #1.
 
Honestly, how the **** did 2016 happen?

under 2 P5 offers for 3 consecutive years and all of a sudden we catch lightning in a bottle with a senior laden team.

I credit Phil, Sefo, and the Money Gang for bringing that team together to play way above their expectations
 
Buffskier said:
Honestly, how the **** did 2016 happen?

under 2 P5 offers for 3 consecutive years and all of a sudden we catch lightning in a bottle with a senior laden team.

I credit Phil, Sefo, and the Money Gang for bringing that team together to play way above their expectations
Click to expand...
For all of his faults Mike Mac was actually a pretty good talent evaluator, particularly on defense. He just lacked the ability to attract blue chips, so he was always putting his chips in with undervalued or overlooked players.
 
Gary Indiana said:
For all of his faults Mike Mac was actually a pretty good talent evaluator, particularly on defense. He just lacked the ability to attract blue chips, so he was always putting his chips in with undervalued or overlooked players.
Click to expand...
This was a pure development scenario
Found kids that were diamonds in the rough and would grow and mature
Akhello and Oliver were the rawest athletes as Freshman
Everyone played early and got beat up and grew from every game
2016 was the culmination of enough talent that was upperclassmen and connected together at a deep level
Throw in some wildcards like Montez throwing the ball around the park, and 10 wins
It was special, it was a miracle, and that chart even makes it more amazing

Almost like a Matt Rhule "Be Brotherhood" moment
 
4BienemyTDs said:
This was a pure development scenario
Found kids that were diamonds in the rough and would grow and mature
Akhello and Oliver were the rawest athletes as Freshman
Everyone played early and got beat up and grew from every game
2016 was the culmination of enough talent that was upperclassmen and connected together at a deep level
Throw in some wildcards like Montez throwing the ball around the park, and 10 wins
It was special, it was a miracle, and that chart even makes it more amazing

Almost like a Matt Rhule "Be Brotherhood" moment
Click to expand...
Let's not forget we had a legit defensive coordinator too. Development and scheme worked wonders.

8 guys in that defense got at least a cup of coffee in the NFL the next season.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top