the buyouts for 28 and 29 are a bit low IMHO but maybe that's normal ??
If Dabo was to leave this year for another coaching role, the buyout is $60 million.
If Kirby was to leave this year for another coaching role, the buyout is $118 million.
Can someone post another screenshot of the liquidated damages clause?
Just the way it’s written. If it was cumulative, I would expect the preceding sentence to say something like (paraphrasing) “if Sanders chooses to leave before the end of the contract he would owe $X based on the number of years left including the amounts the would be owed in later years”What makes you and hawg think that it isn’t?
I stand corrected. And I’m happy to give RG credit on this one since it seems he has a salary in the top 5 of CFB but his buyout from CU’s perspective is actually ahead of his peers. Very cool.Pretty sure you’re confusing two things here. Clemson owes Dabo $60M if they terminate his contract, and Kirby is due his full contract ($118M) if he’s fired before 2026, then 85% after.
However, if Kirby terminates by resignation, it’s much lower. He holds a $5 million buyout for resignation through the end of the 2026 calendar year, and that figure drops by $1 million annually.
When it was originally agreed to, if Dabo left Clemson for another school, he would have had to pay Clemson $6 million, $5 million in 2023 and 2024, $4 million now in 2025, $3 million in 2026 and 2027, $2 million in 2028 and 2029 and $1 million in 2030.
There is no amount owed should Dabo leave Clemson at any point for the NFL.
So, relative to those other contracts this represents a commitment by Prime.
Edit: also, I should point out that the Dabo owes 150% if he leave for bama.
I knew you'd come around.Just the way it’s written. If it was cumulative, I would expect the preceding sentence to say something like (paraphrasing) “if Sanders chooses to leave before the end of the contract he would owe $X based on the number of years left including the amounts the would be owed in later years”
I stand corrected. And I’m happy to give RG credit on this one since it seems he has a salary in the top 5 of CFB but his buyout from CU’s perspective is actually ahead of his peers. Very cool.
Also, RK says he has heard that a substantial NIL commitment was part of this process and multiple people “stepped up”.
View attachment 83771
I do specialize as an attorney in government contracts. This provision is fully enforceable.Not an employment lawyer, but if the damages clause is too high, I think it would be unenforceable. Tantamount to slavery. Well-paid slavery, but I suspect still unenforceable.
I do specialize as an attorney in government contracts. This provision is fully enforceable.
The buyout is year-by-year, not cumulative. Do you really think that both CU's and Deion's attorneys are hacks, who would allow their clients to sign a public entity contract which contains a very important and highly negotiated term which is unenforceable?A $118mm liquidated damages clause? Call me skeptical.
Revenue sharing is capped. NIL is still legal. Managed in-house now at most schools. Must reflect fair-market. Now monitored. Still key to program success.Regarding our war chest, correct me if I’m wrong but all programs now essentially have a max salary cap?
The buyout is year-by-year, not cumulative. Do you really think that both CU's and Deion's attorneys are hacks, who would allow their clients to sign a public entity contract which contains a very important and highly negotiated term which is unenforceable?
Maybe produce a screenshot of the liquidated damages clause.Maybe go back and read a bit closer.
Maybe produce a screenshot of the liquidated damages clause.
Fair!Maybe I don’t like your snark sometimes. And maybe I wish you were a little less snarky. Sometimes. Maybe.
And maybe you could write a post longer than ten words, and more than one sentence.
Any chance they could slip a mil or two over to Tad?Also, RK says he has heard that a substantial NIL commitment was part of this process and multiple people “stepped up”.
View attachment 83771
Who?Any chance they could slip a mil or two over to Tad?