AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
CU @ Arizona 12/5 - 5PM MT - FS1
- Thread starter SewallBeach
- Start date
These mother****ers don't even like football.
You're pretty particular about your pants....as a matter of fact, the most partiular pants guy I know.
Fair point. There are definitely rules for my pants.
Is that they are either Fjallraven Kebs or Levis Made in America, shrink-to-fit button-fly 501s.
It's not that hard.
Gross
Oh, it's hard enough.
Gross
Swagg wagon 1 
Rob DeVere
Well-Known Member
Worse thing about that game was Walter Stanley dropping a couple, maybe three, sure TD passes (three strides ahead of the nearest defender and the ball hit him squarely in the hands) that would have made the score closer and somewhat more respectable!
WarBuff
Club Member
You must have been sober. I wasn’t.
WarBuff
Club Member
Does 40-16 against ASU 2016 work?
I would obviously love a blowout, but I just want a W.
Totally agree. But think this could be a blowout in our favor
Was that the same year that we kicked the **** out of OSU as well (for two halves)?
Oh, but its getting there
WarBuff
Club Member
Raced out to a big lead and then coasted to an easy win, same with AZ. I think the ASU game sticks out because we have struggled with them.
LongHaulBuff
Club Member
UCLA 38-16 ass whopping in 2018
tangent: for the last 2+ years, most work associates that I've engaged with have more of an British influence than American influence on their English.
in most of Britian, "pants" refers to "underwear worn below the waist" (and colloquially to mean something negative, e.g. "that meeting was pants -- the customer is bloody fuming over our missed delivery"). My use of the term once led to a round of laughter when discussing laundry, and I've since tried to use a more cross-cultural term, "trousers", instead. "slacks" is apparently a term Brits understand but never use.
in most of Britian, "pants" refers to "underwear worn below the waist" (and colloquially to mean something negative, e.g. "that meeting was pants -- the customer is bloody fuming over our missed delivery"). My use of the term once led to a round of laughter when discussing laundry, and I've since tried to use a more cross-cultural term, "trousers", instead. "slacks" is apparently a term Brits understand but never use.
I think all of the pansy-ass uniform fan boys on this site should start referring to our team's uniform pants as "trousers".
Only if we get to call jerseys blouses
In before Prince.
Perfect compromise. Except now in your homeland you sound like a ****ing twat.
Now?
I don't think anyone who has started a thread or made a post about the perfect pair of jeans gets to say a single thing about people who talk about clothes worn by athletes.