They’re way ahead of schedule on that late season offensive collapse.I don't see any way it improves much. The defenses we're facing the rest of the way are good. It's also time for the annual late season offensive collapse that CU has patented.
They’re way ahead of schedule on that late season offensive collapse.I don't see any way it improves much. The defenses we're facing the rest of the way are good. It's also time for the annual late season offensive collapse that CU has patented.
Oregon: "I gotcha fam"I think we almost have to root for the offense to remain ****ty if we actually want this thread to mean anything. If the OL turns it around at all and the offense starts to click a bit more over the last 5 games, I think they'll keep Chev and use Rod as the (only) scapegoat
While the OL play was atrocious and Rod should have been left in whatever backwater high school they found him in, the predictability of the offense is still a huge issue. Turning around the OL is going to be really hard but, even if they play better, I don’t see the offense making big strides.I think we almost have to root for the offense to remain ****ty if we actually want this thread to mean anything. If the OL turns it around at all and the offense starts to click a bit more over the last 5 games, I think they'll keep Chev and use Rod as the (only) scapegoat
While the OL play was atrocious and Rod should have been left in whatever backwater high school they found him in, the predictability of the offense is still a huge issue. Turning around the OL is going to be really hard but, even if they play better, I don’t see the offense making big strides.
Regardless, I’m not going to root for them to continue to suck.
I think we almost have to root for the offense to remain ****ty if we actually want this thread to mean anything. If the OL turns it around at all and the offense starts to click a bit more over the last 5 games, I think they'll keep Chev and use Rod as the (only) scapegoat
I would say yes except for the fact that this stint as OC is consistent with his previous stint. Particularly unimaginative and predictable play calling.To the point that you simply can’t allow somebody to continue in their position when the performance has been this bad: I don’t disagree. Chev has to go. Has to. Keeping him sends the absolute wrong message. However- as is typically the case in situations like this, Chev is likely being made the scapegoat for problems far above his pay grade. We all have been there - a guy is given zero support or the tools necessary to succeed, and he fails. Those above him who should have been providing that support point to the dismissal as evidence that they’re paying attention to the problem. In reality, they’re the ones creating the problem in the first place. Said another way - it doesn’t matter who they get to replace Rod, Chev, KD, or even RG. Anybody hired into those positions is being set up to fail under the current leadership.
He had the same level of support in his last stint as OC as he has now.I would say yes except for the fact that this stint as OC is consistent with his previous stint. Particularly unimaginative and predictable play calling.
What tool/support was he missing that led to unimaginative play calling? I guess I’m missing how he was set up to fail from that standpoint in either coaching staff.He had the same level of support in his last stint as OC as he has now.
I expect better too. Don’t get me wrong. My point that I want to make is that we shouldn’t expect a whole lot better given the level of support given to anybody at CU. We all expect better, but have we ever really gotten it except in very short bursts here and there over the last 20 years? We haven’t gone through seven head coaches in 20 years, and none of them have had any real sustained success. At some point, don’t we have to realize that it’s got to be more than just a problem with the coach. The law of averages would dictate that at some point, one of those guys would be worth something.What tool/support was he missing that led to unimaginative play calling? I guess I’m missing how he was set up to fail from that standpoint in either coaching staff.
Even if I accepted the set up to fail narrative, I’d still expect better than last in FBS.
Even 5 win Hawkins or MacIntyre is better than what’s happening now and I’m not willing to give Chev a pass because “we suck”. He makes too much money for thatI expect better too. Don’t get me wrong. My point that I want to make is that we shouldn’t expect a whole lot better given the level of support given to anybody at CU. We all expect better, but have we ever really gotten it except in very short bursts here and there over the last 20 years? We haven’t gone through seven head coaches in 20 years, and none of them have had any real sustained success. At some point, don’t we have to realize that it’s got to be more than just a problem with the coach. The law of averages would dictate that at some point, one of those guys would be worth something.
I need to make sure nobody thinks I’m giving anybody a pass, especially Chev. But that 5-win Hawkins and McIntyre is probably pretty close to our ceiling until some dramatic changes are made in the leadership at CU. As long as 5-7 is acceptable, that should be what we expect. And make no mistake: 5-7 is absolutely acceptable to this group of CU leadership.Even 5 win Hawkins or MacIntyre is better than what’s happening now and I’m not willing to give Chev a pass because “we suck”. He makes too much money for that
they were uncoachedSomething has to change. What I don't understand is the OL looked good last year. What happened?
I think we all agree with you that we would like a new OC to do his game planning in the basement of Norlin far from the ability of the head coach to pop his head in.I expect better too. Don’t get me wrong. My point that I want to make is that we shouldn’t expect a whole lot better given the level of support given to anybody at CU. We all expect better, but have we ever really gotten it except in very short bursts here and there over the last 20 years? We haven’t gone through seven head coaches in 20 years, and none of them have had any real sustained success. At some point, don’t we have to realize that it’s got to be more than just a problem with the coach. The law of averages would dictate that at some point, one of those guys would be worth something.
The problems that I think can be 100% pinned on Chev:What tool/support was he missing that led to unimaginative play calling? I guess I’m missing how he was set up to fail from that standpoint in either coaching staff.
Even if I accepted the set up to fail narrative, I’d still expect better than last in FBS.
And beyond this, part of the reason for #2 could be that he was told one time too many that a kid he wanted to get wouldn’t be admitted. Or that kids he did get in are struggling because they can’t get the academic support that is provided at other programs. All purely speculative on my part, but wouldn’t be completely out of the question, given what we have come to learn about the system in place at CU since the “scandal”.The problems that I think can be 100% pinned on Chev:
1. Bad playcalling.
2. Mailing it in as a recruiter as soon as the promotion came.
Those are enough to warrant letting him go, especially the second one.
He has not been given the opportunity to create his own playbook, nor has been given a budget or free reign to assemble his own staff.
For all we know, he might actually do well at those things.
I mean, probably not, but we don't and can't know if he'd be good at that unless he's given the chance.
Wasn't it his playbook that tanked in his first chance at OC? And didn't it also result in a huge falling out between Chev and our OL coach?The problems that I think can be 100% pinned on Chev:
1. Bad playcalling.
2. Mailing it in as a recruiter as soon as the promotion came.
Those are enough to warrant letting him go, especially the second one.
He has not been given the opportunity to create his own playbook, nor has been given a budget or free reign to assemble his own staff.
For all we know, he might actually do well at those things.
I mean, probably not, but we don't and can't know if he'd be good at that unless he's given the chance.
MM was pretty adamant that it was his playbook, and Chev was only adding some new "elements."Wasn't it his playbook that tanked in his first chance at OC? And didn't it also result in a huge falling out between Chev and our OL coach?
So what's the "full Chev" playbook? Dusting off the one that Kingsbury used to have 4 losing seasons in 6 years at TTU despite him being the best QB recruiter & developer in the nation?MM was pretty adamant that it was his playbook, and Chev was only adding some new "elements."
That's my point: we don't actually know.So what's the "full Chev" playbook? Dusting off the one that Kingsbury used to have 4 losing seasons in 6 years at TTU despite him being the best QB recruiter & developer in the nation?
Allegedly, GB pulled them both to the side after the game and said, "I don't think 'pick play' means what you think it does."So did KD or Chev design the play where the WRs run into each other and fall down?
I’m not sure that he’s been handed a playbook this time. I have seen speculation but nothing definitive.The problems that I think can be 100% pinned on Chev:
1. Bad playcalling.
2. Mailing it in as a recruiter as soon as the promotion came.
Those are enough to warrant letting him go, especially the second one.
He has not been given the opportunity to create his own playbook, nor has been given a budget or free reign to assemble his own staff.
For all we know, he might actually do well at those things.
I mean, probably not, but we don't and can't know if he'd be good at that unless he's given the chance.
Eh, that guy will get $700k-$800k/year and probably 2 year contract. Maybe 3 years depending on who it isI just realized something: even if you set aside the question of KD allowing him full control of the offense, to get a legit good OC in here, we're going to have to do one of two things (and probably both):
1. Lots of guaranteed money, and
2. A promise of multi-year stability.
You think KD's contract buyout looks bad now?
Just wait till it's extended, and we have an OC with a big, multiple year salary that's also guaranteed.
Which isn't enough to get an actually good coordinator.Eh, that guy will get $700k-$800k/year and probably 2 year contract. Maybe 3 years depending on who it is
Maybe your expectations need to be checked. $800k would put that person in the top 20-30 range of OCs in the country. This isn't a program that's going to pay $1m+ for a coordinator.Which isn't enough to get an actually good coordinator.
Some Louisiana HS coach will jump at that offer, but a legit candidate will demand more guaranteed money and /or some evidence that KD isn't getting fired at the end of 2022.