What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

I'm kind of wondering why the other schools would agree to uneven revenue split on CFP money. If OR and WA had an actionable offer does anyone think an uneven revenue split would keep them from moving?
Idk but if we stay that’s huge for us. We would absolutely benefit from that.
 
Yeah USC and UCLA were so bullish on the Pac future success they grabbed a lifeboat before anyone else in the conference knew the ship was sinking. Both schools are sitting on the beach counting their $$$ sipping margaritas wondering if anyone else survived.
It’s more like they sank the ship while everyone was asleep then jumped onto a yacht.
 
But staying in the P12-2, oh wait the P-12-3, oh wait maybe the P12-6 is a better option how?
No TV deal, no money!!!!
Because you dont want to be part of a league that likes football, because its red states, and ****ty towns?
Won’t the Big12 always be there as a last resort? CU is instantly #1 brand (sad).
 
We are basically going to be in the same spot we would have been if Baylor took our place in the P12 along with the five other Big 12 South schools back then. I am pleased that CU will be on ESPN+ instead of the P12N but my biggest concern is that ASU & Utah comes to the B12 in addition to UA. That will make the B12 more manageable. But what I missed about the B12 all those years were how people from other B12 fanbases couldn't stand CU and its fans but were united in hate of Nebraska. The 4C schools + BYU could bring that back and we would resume reminding KU, KSU, ISU, and OSU fans of where they came from after beating their team in Boulder.

My hope is that Coach Prime gets the opposing fanbases riled up that they want to beat us but deeply seethe because we beat 'em. That is what was so good about playing our old Big 8 rivals. My hope is that we get that back and build upon that with the other 4C schools. If not, I'm going to just watch the CSU & Nebraska games and any other rival CU has while I watch other rivalries across the college sports landscape.
 
Won’t the Big12 always be there as a last resort? CU is instantly #1 brand (sad).
What do we wait for? P12 isn't getting the TV money. There is no one the P12 can add that would raise the value. 6 of the remaining 10 are looking for a way out.
 
What do we wait for? P12 isn't getting the TV money. There is no one the P12 can add that would raise the value. 6 of the remaining 10 are looking for a way out.
If the P12 was smart, they would have added Boise St and SDSU. Forget about academics on this one. Boise has proven itself for 25 years. More important people like watching them play.
 
Anna Kendrick Movie GIF by Pitch Perfect
As if things weren't ****ty enough in this thread already.
 
My understanding is that the B12 move is justified with several key things, but I'm not honestly certain if this was told to my buddy or he's arrived at this thru yacking with the money club over at CU....

1. UW and UO are potential next ones out to the B1G, which would damage the PAC12 profoundly and there's no names in the B12 that the B1G is likely to consider anytime soon. So this is playing defense to some extent.
2. The money is better, no matter what Wilner had me thinking. So why wait to see if the PAC12 gets pummeled.
3. The PAC12 deal is worse than expected?
4. The exposure is better for recruiting Texas to the Southeast. Quite a big difference all issues considered.
5. Less restrictions on what CU can do marketing wise than with the PAC12. (speculation in my opinion)
 
My understanding is that the B12 move is justified with several key things, but I'm not honestly certain if this was told to my buddy or he's arrived at this thru yacking with the money club over at CU....

1. UW and UO are potential next ones out to the B1G, which would damage the PAC12 profoundly and there's no names in the B12 that the B1G is likely to consider anytime soon. So this is playing defense to some extent.
2. The money is better, no matter what Wilner had me thinking. So why wait to see if the PAC12 gets pummeled.
3. The PAC12 deal is worse than expected?
4. The exposure is better for recruiting Texas to the Southeast. Quite a big difference all issues considered.
5. Less restrictions on what CU can do marketing wise than with the PAC12. (speculation in my opinion)
If the B1G hasn’t taken UO/UW by now they’re not going to anytime soon. Eventually? Maybe. But one way to enter the conversation is to kick their a** repeatedly for the next 5-7 years.
 
If the P12 was smart, they would have added Boise St and SDSU. Forget about academics on this one. Boise has proven itself for 25 years. More important people like watching them play.
Yes agree but they don't bring back the $$ being lost and doesn't reach the level of $$$ in the B12. So the Pac just falls further behind in revenue. Knowing that our and uw want out its just a matter of time before the Pac is dead or relegated to MWC starts.
 
If the B1G hasn’t taken UO/UW by now they’re not going to anytime soon. Eventually? Maybe. But one way to enter the conversation is to kick their a** repeatedly for the next 5-7 years.
What do uw and uo do if Pac tv rev under $20mm per team?
 
The Big 12 would take them if they wanted out. A four team add of CU/AZ/UW/UO is probably the most profitable quartet they could add.
And its not like you can't get out (unlike the ACC) OU and UT just did. It just takes time and money.
 
Ari Wasserman of The Athletic today:

I do have some questions about how Texas’ and Oklahoma’s departure from the Big 12 will impact the remaining programs. The notion of Power 5/Group of 5 is going to be eliminated eventually as expansion continues, and there isn’t a traditional blue blood remaining in the Big 12 to carry the flag. In five years, will the Big 12 be looked at as a conference that plays a lower brand of football in the same way we view the Group of 5 now? That’s possible.


 
The Big 12 would take them if they wanted out. A four team add of CU/AZ/UW/UO is probably the most profitable quartet they could add.
But OU and UW are greedy and want the BIG money. Might end up being a surprise to them when the BIG doesn't take them. I don't think they bring anything that would justify the money they would get from the BIG
 
Yes. There will be 3 classes. The wealthy, middle class and poors. P2 will be wealthy, The current/remaining P5 scraps will be the middle class while current G5 will be poors that likely have to create their own playoff of some sort as they likely won’t have access to the CFP.
 
But OU and UW are greedy and want the BIG money. Might end up being a surprise to them when the BIG doesn't take them. I don't think they bring anything that would justify the money they would get from the BIG
Obviously this would be dependent on the B1G not moving to add them in the short term.
 
Back
Top