I would argue that’s not all that’s at work here. There are some existential and egotistical elements at work as well. USC and UT don’t need more money. They have as much as they could possibly spend. They need the accolades and attention that comes from competing at the highest level of college football, regardless of the consequences. This goes beyond a money grab, although I’ll agree that money is a contributing factor.What you are seeing in college football is pure capitalist principles being at work. People in the States just aren't used to them in sports as the pro sports are about as socialist as they come.
...it's gotta be the shoes.I think you guys are vastly underestimating RG and his influence. If CU does get that invite to go with USC and UCLA, it will be because of him, not in spite of him. I still don’t know if I want that to happen or not. I really dislike what college football has become.
I could be wrong, but I wonder how many Oregon state legislators' lives could be forever changed with one call from Uncle Phil.
I think the Beavs are ****ed.
Maybe, or it could be the B1G is going after the CFL in a move northward.If they are going to announce more PAC12 schools is has to be today.
OSU and WSU are either going to beg the Big12 or look to the MWC. Yikes.they totally are. and so is wazzu.
I would argue that’s not all that’s at work here. There are some existential and egotistical elements at work as well. USC and UT don’t need more money. They have as much as they could possibly spend. They need the accolades and attention that comes from competing at the highest level of college football, regardless of the consequences. This goes beyond a money grab, although I’ll agree that money is a contributing factor.
If they are going to announce more PAC12 schools is has to be today.
I think it is gone no matter whatThere remains a possibility that the PAC remains a viable D-1 conference. It can withstand the loss of USC and UCLA (although admittedly that’s a huge blow), but lose UO, UW and one or two others and the entire league collapses. You can’t be a national conference when your best team is Utah.
Phoenix #11
Seattle #12
Denver #16
Portland #21
what kind of pull does this have ?
Nah...Pac-12 GOR expires after the 2023 season so USC & UCLA and anyone who leaves won't have to pay one dime. This broke today because the B1G is finalizing their new media rights deal soon.
Nah...Pac-12 GOR expires after the 2023 season so USC & UCLA and anyone who leaves won't have to pay one dime. This broke today because the B1G is finalizing their new media rights deal soon.
There remains a possibility that the PAC remains a viable D-1 conference. It can withstand the loss of USC and UCLA (although admittedly that’s a huge blow), but lose UO, UW and one or two others and the entire league collapses. You can’t be a national conference when your best team is Utah.
UCLA is how Fox and the BIG are cutting the Pac 12 and competing networks, off at the knees. Without the LA market, the remaining PAC would be ****ed for media rights.This... This also tells me that USC is the piece that adds revenue... UCLA is USC's sidepiece... also if UW and/or Oregon ADDED value they'd be part of this... they aren't. Adding them probably doesn't decrease a per team payout though, so they could be added later. They need USCs brand to maximize the payout from, probably, Fox.
All true. But I go back to what I’d prefer college football to be, and I’m not all that upset at the idea that we would be in a watered down PAC 10 that is no longer able to compete financially. In fact, I think that’s the way this is all headed. There will be the B1G and the SEC. Each conference will have 20-24 members. Maybe CU is in that group, maybe not. I kind of think I’d rather they not be.That possibility is minimal. Any team outside the B1G and SEC will be so financially disadvantaged that it'll take a miracle to compete with those teams. Theoretically there always of course is a chance, particularly in a one and done playoff, but those probabilities are not going to be very high and not worth seriously talking about.
All true. But I go back to what I’d prefer college football to be, and I’m not all that upset at the idea that we would be in a watered down PAC 10 that is no longer able to compete financially. In fact, I think that’s the way this is all headed. There will be the B1G and the SEC. Each conference will have 20-24 members. Maybe CU is in that group, maybe not. I kind of think I’d rather they not be.