What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

I could be wrong, but I wonder how many Oregon state legislators' lives could be forever changed with one call from Uncle Phil.

I think the Beavs are ****ed.
 
What you are seeing in college football is pure capitalist principles being at work. People in the States just aren't used to them in sports as the pro sports are about as socialist as they come.
I would argue that’s not all that’s at work here. There are some existential and egotistical elements at work as well. USC and UT don’t need more money. They have as much as they could possibly spend. They need the accolades and attention that comes from competing at the highest level of college football, regardless of the consequences. This goes beyond a money grab, although I’ll agree that money is a contributing factor.
 
I think you guys are vastly underestimating RG and his influence. If CU does get that invite to go with USC and UCLA, it will be because of him, not in spite of him. I still don’t know if I want that to happen or not. I really dislike what college football has become.
...it's gotta be the shoes.
 
I do believe that the PAC 12 is done as we know it
The TV Deal from the beginning were to radical and have caused this point in time to happen
I think that the PAC12 and BIG12 have to merge and start over with the new teams they have asked in as well as the rest of the PAC12 in a more modern structure that is ran sadly from another location, maybe even Denver or Houston
 
I would argue that’s not all that’s at work here. There are some existential and egotistical elements at work as well. USC and UT don’t need more money. They have as much as they could possibly spend. They need the accolades and attention that comes from competing at the highest level of college football, regardless of the consequences. This goes beyond a money grab, although I’ll agree that money is a contributing factor.

Egoistical elements, you say? Siri, what is capitalism?
 
The entire organization of college football (and basketball) is going to be an amazing show for the next 2-3 decades as different schools figure out what kind of commitment they want to make to winning at what level.

Some are going to try to be active in the big time and discover that they don't have the stomach to have a freshman QB bringing in more money than the entire budget for some of their academic departments. Some are going to look at the inevitable media reports of recruits admitted who never bothered to go to a class in HS or who can't read or write after three years at ol' State U.

Others who were left out initially will want to do what they have to do to buy their ways in.

There are probably 20-25 schools that will spend whatever it takes and don't care about the appearances or compromises needed to win. The rest are going to go through a bunch of consideration about how badly they want to have the privilege of getting beaten up by the schools that will spend double or more what they can afford just to get a big paycheck.

What we can be sure of is that in the last 50 years the only time CU was willing to come close to that level of commitment was when Gee was running things.
 
There remains a possibility that the PAC remains a viable D-1 conference. It can withstand the loss of USC and UCLA (although admittedly that’s a huge blow), but lose UO, UW and one or two others and the entire league collapses. You can’t be a national conference when your best team is Utah.
 
If they are going to announce more PAC12 schools is has to be today.

Nah...Pac-12 GOR expires after the 2023 season so USC & UCLA and anyone who leaves won't have to pay one dime. This broke today because the B1G is finalizing their new media rights deal soon.
 
There remains a possibility that the PAC remains a viable D-1 conference. It can withstand the loss of USC and UCLA (although admittedly that’s a huge blow), but lose UO, UW and one or two others and the entire league collapses. You can’t be a national conference when your best team is Utah.
I think it is gone no matter what
Media is in shambles
Many western states are not fully supportive of this big time football anyway
I think it will be gone
 

Phoenix #11
Seattle #12
Denver #16
Portland #21

what kind of pull does this have ?

Way less than most people think.

The key independent variables here are general support for the football program and commitment to the football program at an institutional and fan level with the key dependent variable being (recent) football success, but the 2 independent ones are the key predictors for future success.
 
Nah...Pac-12 GOR expires after the 2023 season so USC & UCLA and anyone who leaves won't have to pay one dime. This broke today because the B1G is finalizing their new media rights deal soon.

This... This also tells me that USC is the piece that adds revenue... UCLA is USC's sidepiece... also if UW and/or Oregon ADDED value they'd be part of this... they aren't. Adding them probably doesn't decrease a per team payout though, so they could be added later. They need USCs brand to maximize the payout from, probably, Fox.
 
There remains a possibility that the PAC remains a viable D-1 conference. It can withstand the loss of USC and UCLA (although admittedly that’s a huge blow), but lose UO, UW and one or two others and the entire league collapses. You can’t be a national conference when your best team is Utah.

That possibility is minimal. Any team outside the B1G and SEC will be so financially disadvantaged that it'll take a miracle to compete with those teams. Theoretically there always of course is a chance, particularly in a one and done playoff, but those probabilities are not going to be very high and not worth seriously talking about.
 
Any chance this is the news that Kelli and Jeremy tweeted about? Not saying the Buffs are involved, but the AD could have brought them in to make a pitch to make CU relevant again.
 
god why do you hate Buff fans so much? haven't we suffered enough? thank you for the miracle in michigan and the national championship and the heisman and the clip and the 5th down and 62-36. but have we not paid enough for those happy days?

please do not relegate us to the b12 or worse. it would be like pounding a case of PBR and hooking up with your now toothless ex.

thank you and sincerely,

every Buff fan over about age 35 (which is most all of us at this point).
 
This... This also tells me that USC is the piece that adds revenue... UCLA is USC's sidepiece... also if UW and/or Oregon ADDED value they'd be part of this... they aren't. Adding them probably doesn't decrease a per team payout though, so they could be added later. They need USCs brand to maximize the payout from, probably, Fox.
UCLA is how Fox and the BIG are cutting the Pac 12 and competing networks, off at the knees. Without the LA market, the remaining PAC would be ****ed for media rights.
 
That possibility is minimal. Any team outside the B1G and SEC will be so financially disadvantaged that it'll take a miracle to compete with those teams. Theoretically there always of course is a chance, particularly in a one and done playoff, but those probabilities are not going to be very high and not worth seriously talking about.
All true. But I go back to what I’d prefer college football to be, and I’m not all that upset at the idea that we would be in a watered down PAC 10 that is no longer able to compete financially. In fact, I think that’s the way this is all headed. There will be the B1G and the SEC. Each conference will have 20-24 members. Maybe CU is in that group, maybe not. I kind of think I’d rather they not be.
 
All true. But I go back to what I’d prefer college football to be, and I’m not all that upset at the idea that we would be in a watered down PAC 10 that is no longer able to compete financially. In fact, I think that’s the way this is all headed. There will be the B1G and the SEC. Each conference will have 20-24 members. Maybe CU is in that group, maybe not. I kind of think I’d rather they not be.

I hate to say it, but I just want to see fun, competitive football again. Even IF we got in, and even IF we got management more committed to winning, we'd still be in a deep NIL hole. We'd still be watching CU get their asses kicked week in and week out.
 
Back
Top