People... If 2010 is the example used for the argument that coaching was more important than talent, then it's a weak argument. If you want to argue against MM's coaching this year and use certain games to demonstrate that point, you also need to look at the games against UCLA, Utah and ASU. Is anyone going to argue that CU has equal talent to any of those 3 schools (or any other school in the P12 for that matter)? I didn't think so. Yet, we took UCLA to 2OT, Utah was a late pick 6 away from a W, and ASU was much closer than anyone would have thought. The coaches did a phenomenal job getting the players ready for those games, against teams that we were clearly out talented. But, in the end, we lost all 3 of those games because our talent on the field couldn't finish against their talent.