There's a chance that game turns into a good loss. Not talking about RPI/NET stuff, but the way they handled the matchups.
That UA squad has all the pieces to make the Final Four. Crazy height without giving up any quickness, multiple shooters, multiple creators, physically built (don't look like a young team), and a high-pressure attack style that's going to overwhelm most opponents instead of letting lesser teams hang around.
I think CU learned what it takes, that they can compete and even control the game when they play as they're capable, and it should have been individually motivating (some proved how good they are/can be, others saw what they need to work on).
It's the type of game that can be a springboard, which I don't think is an obvious take based on the box score. fwiw, the box score looks a lot worse since Tad used about the last 12 minutes or so as a teachable moment to drive certain points home about playing as a team on both ends.