Not as bad as I originally believed in my mind. I’d rather go with other people but this would be intriguing.
I’m with you. It is intriguing
Not as bad as I originally believed in my mind. I’d rather go with other people but this would be intriguing.
How would that apply to Schiano? He didn’t “flame out” as a college HC, he left for an NFL HC job.Are there any coaches who've recovered and been great after their first flame-out as a head coach? I feel once coaches get derailed on their rise through the head coaching ranks they stall, bouncing around as head coaches for low level P5 schools and the G5 ranks or become journeyman coordinators of sorts. Are there stats that say this is wrong?
He did pretty bad as an NFL coach.How would that apply to Schiano? He didn’t “flame out” as a college HC, he left for an NFL HC job.
I don't think it's a negative if the struggle is in the NFL like with Schiano. Holtz, Spurrier, Carroll and Saban all had a bad turn in the NFL and then returned to college to enjoy a ton of success. We'll see what happens with Kelly, but I'm confident that just about every CU fan would have been happy if he was our coach right now. So, no, struggles in the NFL don't particularly concern me. Struggles in another college job would concern me a lot, though.Are there any coaches who've recovered and been great after their first flame-out as a head coach? I feel once coaches get derailed on their rise through the head coaching ranks they stall, bouncing around as head coaches for low level P5 schools and the G5 ranks or become journeyman coordinators of sorts. Are there stats that say this is wrong?
Would you similarly object to Urban Meyer if he were a candidate at CU based on that one loss?
If RG is focused on someone who will be a tough guy and disciplinarian, has had success as a HC and emphasizes recruiting as a priority, Schiano checks all those boxes. He's definitely an "alpha" personality who commands the room, too. Has presence.
He's also at a stage where he could have the passion to win big while making Colorado his last job on a 10-15 year run.
I keep trying to talk myself out of Schiano but then I keep coming back to him as a guy who I think could do really damn well here.
Of the names I've heard floated that aren't among the flavor of the year "hot candidates", Schiano is by far my favorite.
I’m trying to understand what the downside to Schiano is?
I’m not saying he is the best choice but when I ask myself who of the realistic, available coaches could come in and outcoach any of the coaches in the Pac 12 North, only Schiano checks that box.
In the Pac-12 South, Schiano immediately gives us the second best coach. He would be behind Whittingham, but I think given time, Schiano could be better than him.
That’s really one of my biggest points for Schiano. We need a coach who can compete with the top tier of the division and confrence. That means a coach who can put together a staff that can coach, recruit and develop with the best of them. We know that based on his history and high profile level he can do that.
That’s really one of my biggest points for Schiano. We need a coach who can compete with the top tier of the division and confrence. That means a coach who can put together a staff that can coach, recruit and develop with the best of them. We know that based on his history and high profile level he can do that.
How much are you being paid?
How much are you being paid?
You’re placing way too much significance on one game. If every coach or assistant whose team suffered a bad loss was no longer head coaching material, you’d have almost no head coaches.Given his history, of course not. But, the loss does make me think he is closer to another retirement.
I don’t know why the thought of Schiano at CU is so unappealing to so many people here.
He can assemble a staff.
He can recruit.
He has previous P5 HC experience.
He has NFL HC experience.
He is currently a top assistant at an elite level P5 program.
He is still reasonably young at 52 years old.
He would be motivated to kick ass and take names.
Honestly, I don’t understand the reluctance. If we could hire this guy, we should.
Check marks above. There’s juuuuuust one slight problem. Back in the early 90’s at Penn State, he reportedly “walked into a coaches office white as a ghost and said he saw Jerry Sandusky doing something to a boy in the shower”.
Nope.
You’re placing way too much significance on one game. If every coach or assistant whose team suffered a bad loss was no longer head coaching material, you’d have almost no head coaches.
Check marks above. There’s juuuuuust one slight problem. Back in the early 90’s at Penn State, he reportedly “walked into a coaches office white as a ghost and said he saw Jerry Sandusky doing something to a boy in the shower”.
Nope.
https://sports.yahoo.com/tennessee-...-schianos-reputation-mob-anger-015951492.htmlI think there's a thread that discusses this allegation and it seems to have been discredited.
I think there's a thread that discusses this allegation and it seems to have been discredited.
Ok, peace.I think there's a thread that discusses this allegation and it seems to have been discredited.
Getting paid to post on a thread with a handful of comments? LOL. I went to RU and my father went to OSU so I have followed his career and I think he’s the ideal hire. None of the other names really get me excited at all.
The rest of your argument is equally bad. If we were hiring a DC then maybe I’d be more concerned with the performance of the defense in one season over the course of a 30 year coaching career, but we’re not hiring a DC we’re hiring a HC and his resume as a HC is really, really good.Agree to disagree. It wasn’t just that they lost. It is that they were embarrassed by a far less talented team. And really, it was emblematic of the performance of the ohio state defense this year. The team won in spite of their defense. The offense had to outscore opponents by such a wide margin since their defense has been mediocre with top line talent. In your world, the loss doesn’t matter. Fine. What about the rest of my argument that he led a defense with way better players to results that were only marginally better than DJ Eliot in a less offense-oriented conference?
Schiano has regressed as a coach IMO. I’m not interested in a retread who can’t even get it done at a high level with 4 & 5 star talent.
I’d actually be more concerned about a guy who had never faced any kind of adversity in his career. Lupoi and Lake fall into that category for me. Guys who have never really had to face a situation where the player mix was wrong and they and they alone had to fix it.
There are no failures, only learning opportunities. Schiano is ready to take what he has learned and apply it here.
So, naturally, we will hire somebody else. But he’s at the top of my list, frankly.
I'm not sure why the thought of Schiano at CU is so unappealing to so many people here.
He can assemble a staff.
He can recruit.
He has previous P5 HC experience.
He has NFL HC experience.
He is currently a top assistant at an elite level P5 program.
He is still reasonably young at 52 years old.
He would be motivated to kick ass and take names.
Honestly, I don’t understand the reluctance. If we could hire this guy, we should.