I don’t know.Isn't this crowd because there was a Kardashian in town?
I don’t know.Isn't this crowd because there was a Kardashian in town?
he meets one of the kardashians 30 seconds later in the video.I don’t know.
he meets one of the Jenners 30 seconds later in the video.
I know he met Kendall Jenner but I’m just going off the actions and reactions of the people to Shedeur.he meets one of the kardashians 30 seconds later in the video.
Maybe time to lay off the salsa.I had a dream last night that I was solving crimes with Shedeur and Travis Scooby Gang style. It was a really fun dream. Let's just say I didn't have any dreams about the Buffs during Cardboard Karl's coaching stint.
The talk of CP leaving omits the fact he says he truly loves it here. Every aspect of it.Prime staying and succeeding at CU is critical, absolutely critical
Lock up Prime and I bet we get a B1G invite within 1 year
I think the B1G has demonstrated that they think more long term than the school's current coach when making expansion decisions.Lock up Prime and I bet we get a B1G invite within 1 year
SOOOO important, can RG make it happen?
I do not think that is how it is going to work anymoreI think the B1G has demonstrated that they think more long term than the school's current coach when making expansion decisions.
I agree that the P2 conferences likely want to boot the schools who don't invest in football. I'm on the record predicting that near term conference realignment would involve contraction; I actually thought it would have started by now, but I don't know the details of what's involved with removing schools from those conferences.I do not think that is how it is going to work anymore
Purdue and Vanderbilt are useless to the TV guys that want a high Q Rating (popularity and social media clicks) and they want TV ratings
Colorado's brand is already far more valuable than 75% of the B1G and SEC and that is what they want
We sucked and got good ratingsI agree that the P2 conferences likely want to boot the schools who don't invest in football. I'm on the record predicting that near term conference realignment would involve contraction; I actually thought it would have started by now, but I don't know the details of what's involved with removing schools from those conferences.
I agree CU's current (instantaneous?) value is higher than most of the P2, but Colorado hasn't shown that's sustainable.
This is the thing that has to be looked at.We sucked and got good ratings
We are building and get good ratings
Each season is a new story because Prime makes it a story
This is why I strongly feel that if we could create the first College Operating Franchise with Prime as the figurehead and Robert Smith's money then we would lock in a pretty long term story. If Prime leaves, we are a Big12 team forever if we are lucky
I totally agree, it is put up or shut up time and the decision is worth millions and millions and millions, so you have to go big or go homeColorado to the B1G makes sense only if the future involves the P2 prioritizing having a gradient not just top tier programs. Allowing easier in conference opponents will have to be a reality if the SEC and B1G essentially spin off from the rest of college football. Keeping Deion for as long as possible and having on field results is a possible path for CU to enter the P2. If those do not happen CU will shift down to essentially a new division when the next realignment occurs.
The point is, coaches are temporary and the entities making the decisions (the networks) already have the benefit of Prime/CU ratings at half the cost of the B1G and SEC programs. Sure, CU playing Ohio State, Oregon, SC, Michigan, or most SEC programs would be huge ratings, but if/when Prime leaves, the value drops and that won’t be the case anymore.We sucked and got good ratings
We are building and get good ratings
Each season is a new story because Prime makes it a story
This is why I strongly feel that if we could create the first College Operating Franchise with Prime as the figurehead and Robert Smith's money then we would lock in a pretty long term story. If Prime leaves, we are a Big12 team forever if we are lucky
Except that CU has had good ratings all along. We're one of the few schools whose ratings outpace our on-field performance, and it's been that way for a long time.The point is, coaches are temporary and the entities making the decisions (the networks) already have the benefit of Prime/CU ratings at half the cost of the B1G and SEC programs. Sure, CU playing Ohio State, Oregon, SC, Michigan, or most SEC programs would be huge ratings, but if/when Prime leaves, the value drops and that won’t be the case anymore.
TV network execs don't need a polished power point presentation on CU's TV ratings pre-Prime. They are well aware of them in every time slot, on every network, against good and bad opponents, etc. Hell, the Athletic article from a few years ago showed that, removing the COVID year, CU was one of a handful of non-P2 programs that generated a decent amount of 1m+ viewer games.Except that CU has had good ratings all along. We're one of the few schools whose ratings outpace our on-field performance, and it's been that way for a long time.
This is a case where I think RG (and his predecessors) have been making the wrong pitch to the wrong people for a while.
They need a good polished presentation that can be put in front of network executives any and every time they meet showing that CU broadcasts and crowds consistently outperform what would be expected given our records and rankings.
Have the data, be consistent in the message, and we won't be left out.
Thank you.Except that CU has had good ratings all along. We're one of the few schools whose ratings outpace our on-field performance, and it's been that way for a long time.
This is a case where I think RG (and his predecessors) have been making the wrong pitch to the wrong people for a while.
They need a good polished presentation that can be put in front of network executives any and every time they meet showing that CU broadcasts and crowds consistently outperform what would be expected given our records and rankings.
Have the data, be consistent in the message, and we won't be left out.
We're still pitching the wrong people with the wrong data.TV network execs don't need a polished power point presentation on CU's TV ratings pre-Prime. They are well aware of them in every time slot, on every network, against good and bad opponents, etc. Hell, the Athletic article from a few years ago showed that, removing the COVID year, CU was one of a handful of non-P2 programs that generated a decent amount of 1m+ viewer games.
There is a little Big12 Podcast hosted by guys from Utah and BYU about realignment and other factors now that both schools are in the Big12 and got there in different ways. Both BYU and Utah have good solid brands for different reasons, but even though they hated on Prime and CU in the beginning, they thank us every day that we are bringing eyeballs to the Big12. Conversely, when they talk about the B1G and the SEC through the eyes of a former FOX Sports TV exec that is in on the House settlement and other conversations, he said that location, history, academics, AAU DO NOT MATTER at all the networks. The Networks want Brands that can be engaging, and even though all these Blue Bloods have the head start on buying players and playing some pretty meaningful games, they are full of boring ass coaches and invisible infrastructure. Social Media Engagement, Interviews in Big Shows, Personality, Crossover Marketing, etc, etc, etc. It is its own Sports Media "Q" Rating and that is what we need to pitch to everyone everywhere.We're still pitching the wrong people with the wrong data.
They keep talking to conferences about cultural and academic fit. Wrong pitch to wrong audience.
It wouldn't be shocking to anyone with real knowledge for the nu-cu game to be the nubs highest rated game this year, and this in a year when they're playing tOSU. Even if it doesn't actually end up higher, it'll likely be pretty damn close.
That's the message that needs to be to the focus, not "we can compete," not "we're a cultural fit," not "we're an academic fit," but "we deliver a bigger audience not just than any other alternative, but bigger than your average current member, *and* this was true *before* coach prime, and it will be true after him as well."
The one caveat to that is that there is a correct audience for these things. Being an academic peer and located in a state & metro with a significant and growing population of highly qualified college applicants who choose to go to school out-of-state at a high rate is a significant pitch that CU should be making to B1G and SEC Presidents.We're still pitching the wrong people with the wrong data.
They keep talking to conferences about cultural and academic fit. Wrong pitch to wrong audience.
It wouldn't be shocking to anyone with real knowledge for the nu-cu game to be the nubs highest rated game this year, and this in a year when they're playing tOSU. Even if it doesn't actually end up higher, it'll likely be pretty damn close.
That's the message that needs to be to the focus, not "we can compete," not "we're a cultural fit," not "we're an academic fit," but "we deliver a bigger audience not just than any other alternative, but bigger than your average current member, *and* this was true *before* coach prime, and it will be true after him as well."