Be cool to get a 6-9 banger who could get us 7 pts and 4 Rebs a game.Only change I'd make is Barthelemy off bench. Allen starts at 3. I dont like that starting unit at all. Way too small.
Be cool to get a 6-9 banger who could get us 7 pts and 4 Rebs a game.Only change I'd make is Barthelemy off bench. Allen starts at 3. I dont like that starting unit at all. Way too small.
They are all wings and bigs. Lopez twins, Huestes, Zaire Williams, Anthony Brown, KZ Okpala. Landry Fields, the Collins brothers, Dwight Powell need guards to win in college!The Pac program I can't figure out is Stanford post-Montgomery. Seems like there's a Furd guy on the court in every NBA game I watch, but they've been the definition of an NIT level program.
Tyrell Terry is a rookie PG, but yeah. Believe they have another 5* wing coming in next season, too.They are all wings and bigs. Lopez twins, Huestes, Zaire Williams, Anthony Brown, KZ Okpala. Landry Fields, the Collins brothers, Dwight Powell need guards to win in college!
And two years ago with him was probably their best season of the last decadeTyrell Terry is a rookie PG, but yeah. Believe they have another 5* wing coming in next season, too.
Gonzaga is still No. 1, but Villanova and Kentucky are both big risers in the new men's college basketball early top 25
Seth Davis is updating his rankings after transfer portal madness and NBA Draft declarations being made.theathletic.com
Seth Davis does not have us even in the top 35 for coming season. WTF. He has UCLA at 4, Oregon at 29 and USC at 34. Kansas who we play (beat!!) at 18.
He says he's not taking into consideration draft decisions in this which is idiotic to me. Like if a person has declared for the draft he considers them gone. So he has UCLA at 4 with the assumption that Juzang isn't coming back which he very well could. But then he ranks Baylor at 5 with the assumption that Matthew Mayer comes back even though he declared so not really sure of his methodology. He also has Ohio State at 15 since Duane Washington and EJ Leddell have both declared, most places have them as a top 5 team because most people assume they with withdrawal. Overall his rating system is ass.Gonzaga is still No. 1, but Villanova and Kentucky are both big risers in the new men's college basketball early top 25
Seth Davis is updating his rankings after transfer portal madness and NBA Draft declarations being made.theathletic.com
Seth Davis does not have us even in the top 35 for coming season. WTF. He has UCLA at 4, Oregon at 29 and USC at 34. Kansas who we play (beat!!) at 18.
So what you are saying is that Seth Davis is right and you agree with him?Oh, and on topic -- we're not going to be highly regarded going into the year. I agree with some of the reasons, not with some of the others. But take off your black & gold glasses for a second and look at this:
* We're losing arguably one of the top 5 greatest players in program history.
* In fact, we're losing over 55% of our minutes played from last year
* We were a good team but didn't make it out of the second round, so we didn't get national eyes
* We're in a conference that did well in the tournament, but no one watches because our commissioner is an idiot and all of our games aren't on TV.
* We're not a "brand" yet. Yet.
Honestly, I'm not sure I'd put us in the top 35. I might put them in the "keep an eye on". But that's because I know Tad, and we have a top 10 recruiting class coming in. That said, while it's a top 10 recruiting class, there's no "one and done game changer" in there, which is usually what moves the needles on these types of articles. Plus, and stop me if I've said this before, college hoops is a PG's game. We have a PG that I feel better about than I did in February, but am still not 100% confident in. We have help coming with transfers. We have combo guards. But we need Key to make the leap this year - and he very well could.
This team has a WIDE range of outcomes for the year. From "NIT" to "Sweet 16", I don't think anything would surprise me. Personally, I'm leaning more towards the S16 side of the spectrum but I can understand why some are skeptical.
EDIT - But **** Seth Davis. Seriously.
So what you are saying is that Seth Davis is right and you agree with him?
100%, make the kids earn it.FWIW, we are a program that hadn't been dancing in a few years and lost a lot of seniors who played big roles last season.
I'm ok with folks not expecting this to be a program that reloads. 2021-22 is going to be about opening eyes and changing narratives. I think it's good if they feel disrespected and spend the offseason with chips on their shoulders.
We lost the best player ever to graduation. No way anybody on the team can possibly replace Kin’s production. - Wilner, probably.Gonzaga is still No. 1, but Villanova and Kentucky are both big risers in the new men's college basketball early top 25
Seth Davis is updating his rankings after transfer portal madness and NBA Draft declarations being made.theathletic.com
Seth Davis does not have us even in the top 35 for coming season. WTF. He has UCLA at 4, Oregon at 29 and USC at 34. Kansas who we play (beat!!) at 18.
Yeah, while I think the idea is stupid, I'm not sure how this effects college ball at all. Vast majority of recruits will be totally unaffected, and 5 stars will still be pushed by sneaker contracts.And this will end college hoops as we know it how?