Keep working on Burrow. He’s doing a Peyton Manning dive right now
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
National Championship Thread
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
hawg1
Well-Known Member
Ribs?
Bo Jackson was one of the biggest physical freaks in the history of sport. Barry Sanders was absolutely amazing to watch, and has unequivocally a better stat line, but people want to think about what could have been had Bo not gotten hurt. I think that carried into CFB in this vote, and personally I am okay with that. I loved watching Bo play.
Yes. He should have gotten the needle at half....I don’t think he did.
That 1H hit from Skalski seemed to rock him hard - maybe ribs. Burrow doesn’t look as elusive.
Burrow is playing hurt.
Bo didn't get hurt in college. NFL is irrelevant to this. On this, Vince Young was a better QB than Peyton Manning.
I agree with you....that’s why I said I think that dynamic carried into CFB in this case, in response to you asking what else might have influenced the vote. Not debating your position.
hawg1
Well-Known Member
Incredible call.
Don't think they had a choice. that's targeting.
It's soft. That's not football.
Losing Skalski is bad news bears
Maybe - but don't blame the refs on that one. They are calling the rule.
I agree with you, but blame the rule, not the refs for that one. They will probably **** something up horribly now that I'm saying this, but they've been fine tonight.
That’s the rule. I don’t like the rule. At least the ejection part. The rule is just as much to protect the defensive guy as the offensive guy.
I bet we see changes to the rule if Clemson's D collapses now.
No doubt about it. No one should be crying.
This game has been surprisingly good as far as officiating!!!
Why can’t we get this level of reffing every week?
Why can’t we get this level of reffing every week?
jizzrag85
Well-Known Member
I agree, it’s soft. They really need to have variations of the penalty, the automatic ejection irks me so bad. Unavoidable contact and inadvertent leading with your head should be a 15 yard penalty and a warning. Ejections should be for obvious, malicious intent.
EDIT: lol and Klatt beat me to it.
I'm ok with it being targeting. What I'm not ok with is the automatic ejection.
Basketball refs can handle two levels of fouls; there's no reason football refs couldn't - especially with replay.
Targeting 1 = 15 yards, just like an unnecessary roughness.
Targeting 2 = 15 yards + ejection.
Basketball refs can handle two levels of fouls; there's no reason football refs couldn't - especially with replay.
Targeting 1 = 15 yards, just like an unnecessary roughness.
Targeting 2 = 15 yards + ejection.