What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Official 2025 Fall Camp Thread

Here We Go Again GIF
 
I'm excited to see more balance on offense. However, there are just too many dudes at WR and not enough at RB. You will see more designed runs for Salter, options, runs out of RPO, etc.

The offense had a ton of short, quick hitters to Hunter, Wester, and Horn. We won't see that as much this year, but do think it'll still lean more pass than run. WR and dline are the two most talented positions on the team. Coaches will have to lean on them more times than not.
 
Usually with camp reports, if I hear something like "the offense ran the ball well" I'm at least half hearing it as "the defense is horrible against the run." This year, I'll eat it up as a positive with any reports of our OL opening holes and protecting the QB, because I know what our defense returns and added to a group that I have a good understanding of regarding their baseline capabilities.
 
Usually with camp reports, if I hear something like "the offense ran the ball well" I'm at least half hearing it as "the defense is horrible against the run." This year, I'll eat it up as a positive with any reports of our OL opening holes and protecting the QB, because I know what our defense returns and added to a group that I have a good understanding of regarding their baseline capabilities.
Was it last year or the year before when they had a fall open scrimmage at a Denver public HS? I remember reports about how bad the o-line looked, especially in run blocking.
 
I'm excited to see more balance on offense. However, there are just too many dudes at WR and not enough at RB. You will see more designed runs for Salter, options, runs out of RPO, etc.

The offense had a ton of short, quick hitters to Hunter, Wester, and Horn. We won't see that as much this year, but do think it'll still lean more pass than run. WR and dline are the two most talented positions on the team. Coaches will have to lean on them more times than not.
With 4 scholarship RBs, we could use a couple of TEs who can line up in the backfield, carry the ball and block. Williams, an unrated redshirt out of IMG looks interesting.

Howell and Adam M said a number of guys are noticeably bigger and stronger this year. They mentioned Seaton. Lots of praise for the SC guy.
 
With 4 scholarship RBs, we could use a couple of TEs who can line up in the backfield, carry the ball and block. Williams, an unrated redshirt out of IMG looks interesting.

Howell and Adam M said a number of guys are noticeably bigger and stronger this year. They mentioned Seaton. Lots of praise for the SC guy.
4 is plenty. The TE position is vastly different than the FB position. We won't be doing anything like what you proposed. It's not 1986. Williams will never see the field at CU. He's currently 5th on the depth chart at the position. Howell and Adam took the easy way out and mentioned Seaton because they have no idea who else got bigger and stronger.

Just here to help educate and motivate!
 
Back
Top