Great bet
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Official Allbuffs CFB gambling thread
- Thread starter ahoelsken
- Start date
hawg1
Well-Known Member
Maybe not.
I just bwalked that. Sorry
hawg1
Well-Known Member
All good. Ball happens.
On Bovada, I just bet $25 on the Over for Phillip's receiving yards today: 7.5 (-115). (he has to play for there to be a bet). Also $10 on the Over for his rushing yards: 40.5 (-120). I'm hoping he has those by halftime.
.
| 11/8/209:07 AM | Placed - Single To Win $ 21.74
|
.
Took a chalk parlay today of KC, Pitt, Tenn, AZ, NE
whatthebuff
Club Member
Wyoming losing to CSU spooked me out of making any more cfb bets this weekend. Hit pretty big on a Chelsea/Barcelona parlay however. Picked the Pittsburgh Steel in the survivor pool. Thinking Pennsylvania is so clutch these days.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
-7.5 lol oops. Sorry
Buffs open as 7 point dogs next week in Palo Alto:
So just right away, Maryland +27.5 seems crazy high. Idk I took Rutgers to keep it close last week and I’m a little nervous to bet against tOSU again but they just don’t look all that nasty yet and I think good QBs can torch them. I was honestly thinking this line might be more like +18 or so.
hawg1
Well-Known Member
How you figure? You see Oregon game?
It has moved down to -6.5 but I can see why the line is where its at
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Oddsshark has CU winning 19-17
One week is tough for the models to adjust to but SP+ has us ranked very close to Stanford (Stanford +0.7 on a neutral field). I still wouldn't touch this game because Stanford looked okay against Oregon (who we really don't know how good they are) and I still don't have a good handle on CU. Everything I thought going into Saturday was wrong.
Obviously a lot to like last week, but I am deeply afraid of this defense. We look extremely slow on defense and when UCLA got in space we were screwed. I can see why vegas has the line where its at.
I just don't think there's a lot of trust in Miami. They had an ok win over Pitt who has no offense, struggled with UVA and trailed NC State for most of that game. And VT is better than all 3 of those teams plus they're playing at home
Tonight: 0-1 Akron +28 (-115) v 0-1 Ohio -28 (-105). Betting this year is kind of comical. How can they be so 'sure', that 1 team pays -105, the other -115? Do they have a Southern Ohio specialist set these lines?
Edit: I took Akron +27 for a whopping $14 profit.
Edit: I took Akron +27 for a whopping $14 profit.
Last edited:
Last edited:
You got me going. Placed 5 - $1.00 quinellas for the 1st round. They are, I think, +3500 for the quinella, for the entire tournament - why the odds so much higher for the 1st round?
| 11/11/2010:42 AM | Placed - SingleTo Win $ 125.00
|
Much greater variance for one round vs. four