Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Official Buffs @ Oregon Game Thread

Duff Man said:
It is not talking down so much as stating the obvious: there is no substitute for game action. When a game is out of hand, you have to make the most of it to develop backups. Lytle has like five snaps through six games. Do you think that helps his development much?
Click to expand...
Again, my main point was that I don’t agree with pulling him in the beginning of the third quarter when we could still conceivably come back however unlikely. But now 45-3 in the 4th, sure why not.
 
manhattanbuf said:
We’ve watched the guy for years. We know what we have in Montez. We didn’t need him to throw more INTs to see the writing on the wall.
Click to expand...
Fine, and I agree that Montez is who he is. But I still think he gives us the best chance of winning six games so I think you stick with him until the game is 100% out of reach.
 
cowe6453 said:
Fine, and I agree that Montez is who he is. But I still think he gives us the best chance of winning six games so I think you stick with him until the game is 100% out of reach.
Click to expand...
He helped put the game out of reach. We didn’t need another INT to make it a no hoper.
 
DBT said:
Mangham running hard.
Click to expand...
Played Smith before Mangham tonight.

I like Smith but Mangham was the clear #2 guy before tonight and he has looked good.

Wonder if this wasn't a message from MT to some guys about effort and improvement..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top