That looks like if it's from ESPN.com and we don't know what site the CFP committee uses for their SOS and SOR, unless that is published somewhere
People who have sat in on mock selections have said they use “multiple” sources. I think that’s the right way.That looks like if it's from ESPN.com and we don't know what site the CFP committee uses for their SOS and SOR, unless that is published somewhere
What about point 4 of the protocol?If FSU is left out, then playoff selections were made based strictly on subjective opinions.
It would completely disregard the most important part of sports: playing games and outcomes.
Picking Alabama over FSU because “experts” think they may be better is hot garbage.
I don't understand all the people making declarative statements that Alabama (and Georgia and Ohio State) is the "best" team when compared to Florida State.
Based on what other that personal, subjective opinion from a conditioning bias which tells you that the SEC and B1G are better?
Far too much time on my hands, but here goes.
There's 32 possible outcomes for 5 games, I'm going to assume a Michigan and Texas win, but here's how I think the other 8 scenarios could play out.
5. Washington, Bama, FSU win
Should be: 1. Michigan, 2. Washington, 3. FSU, 4. Texas, as above committee maybe does this if Rodemaker has a stellar game
Committee does: 1. Michigan, 2. Washington, 3. Texas, 4. Bama
Of course, all of that is probably nonsense, and somehow Bama and Georgia both end up in.
Point 4. Will it come into play ir not by Committee.I don't understand all the people making declarative statements that Alabama (and Georgia and Ohio State) is the "best" team when compared to Florida State.
Based on what other that personal, subjective opinion from a conditioning bias which tells you that the SEC and B1G are better?
But FSU and Bama are not close in resume because, you know, Bama has a loss and FSU doesn’t.Point 4. Will it come into play ir not by Committee.
Not to mention that even with the 3 point repeat win over Oregon, Washington has nearly as many question marks as FSU.I don't understand all the people making declarative statements that Alabama (and Georgia and Ohio State) is the "best" team when compared to Florida State.
Based on what other that personal, subjective opinion from a conditioning bias which tells you that the SEC and B1G are better?
If FSU is left out, then playoff selections were made based strictly on subjective opinions.
It would completely disregard the most important part of sports: playing games and outcomes.
Picking Alabama over FSU because “experts” think they may be better is hot garbage.
The teams are comparable at the margin IMO. If the Conmittee believes so, point 4 applies. If not, it doesn’t play.But FSU and Bama are not close in resume because, you know, Bama has a loss and FSU doesn’t.
Because of the protocol.Not to mention that even with the 3 point repeat win over Oregon, Washington has nearly as many question marks as FSU.
If you're huffing B1G/SEC farts and really think Bama is undeniably way, way better than FSU, then why not:
1. Michigan
2. Bama
3. Georgia
4. Ohio State
If both teams had one loss, then the Jordan Travis part of point 4 would matter, but wins and losses come first. Not to mention FSU has won multiple games without Travis, including over a top 10 Louisville team.The teams are comparable at the margin IMO. If the Conmittee believes so, point 4 applies. If not, it doesn’t play.
Because of a subjective interpretation of a subjective protocol that lacks clear definitions.Because of the protocol.
Why is Washington not in that discussion for you? Even with Penix they're just as flawed as FSU or BamaThe teams are comparable at the margin IMO. If the Conmittee believes so, point 4 applies. If not, it doesn’t play.
That is known as the “SEC Clause”.What about point 4 of the protocol?
That’s an incorrect interpretation of the protocol.If both teams had one loss, then the Jordan Travis part of point 4 would matter, but wins and losses come first. Not to mention FSU has won multiple games without Travis, including over a top 10 Louisville team.
Point 4 is clear. It was applied.Because of a subjective interpretation of a subjective protocol that lacks clear definitions.
It's horribly constructed to allow them to justify what they need to.