What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Official CFP Selection Freakout Thread

If FSU is left out, then playoff selections were made based strictly on subjective opinions.

It would completely disregard the most important part of sports: playing games and outcomes.

Picking Alabama over FSU because “experts” think they may be better is hot garbage.
 
If FSU is left out, then playoff selections were made based strictly on subjective opinions.

It would completely disregard the most important part of sports: playing games and outcomes.

Picking Alabama over FSU because “experts” think they may be better is hot garbage.
What about point 4 of the protocol?
 
Last second prediction:

1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. Texas
4. Alabama

CFP committee bailed out by Travis's injury.

SEC/Big Ten stans complaining that Michigan/Alabama is the 'real national championship'.
 
I don't understand all the people making declarative statements that Alabama (and Georgia and Ohio State) is the "best" team when compared to Florida State.

Based on what other than personal, subjective opinion from a conditioning bias which tells you that the SEC and B1G are better?
 
Last edited:
I don't understand all the people making declarative statements that Alabama (and Georgia and Ohio State) is the "best" team when compared to Florida State.

Based on what other that personal, subjective opinion from a conditioning bias which tells you that the SEC and B1G are better?

Totally.

The Big Ten/SEC stans out there would have you believe that the 'real' playoff would be Michigan, Ohio State, Georgia, and Alabama, when any objective measurement says that Washington is no less than the #2 team in the nation.
 
Far too much time on my hands, but here goes.

There's 32 possible outcomes for 5 games, I'm going to assume a Michigan and Texas win, but here's how I think the other 8 scenarios could play out.



5. Washington, Bama, FSU win

Should be: 1. Michigan, 2. Washington, 3. FSU, 4. Texas, as above committee maybe does this if Rodemaker has a stellar game

Committee does: 1. Michigan, 2. Washington, 3. Texas, 4. Bama


Of course, all of that is probably nonsense, and somehow Bama and Georgia both end up in.

I'll stand by this prediction from Tuesday.

It's going to be Bama and Texas.
 
I don't understand all the people making declarative statements that Alabama (and Georgia and Ohio State) is the "best" team when compared to Florida State.

Based on what other that personal, subjective opinion from a conditioning bias which tells you that the SEC and B1G are better?
Point 4. Will it come into play ir not by Committee.
 
I don't understand all the people making declarative statements that Alabama (and Georgia and Ohio State) is the "best" team when compared to Florida State.

Based on what other that personal, subjective opinion from a conditioning bias which tells you that the SEC and B1G are better?
Not to mention that even with the 3 point repeat win over Oregon, Washington has nearly as many question marks as FSU.

If you're huffing B1G/SEC farts and really think Bama is undeniably way, way better than FSU, then why not:

1. Michigan
2. Bama
3. Georgia
4. Ohio State
 
If FSU is left out, then playoff selections were made based strictly on subjective opinions.

It would completely disregard the most important part of sports: playing games and outcomes.

Picking Alabama over FSU because “experts” think they may be better is hot garbage.

It's because they are missing their best player. Their QB had a QBR of 12.7 last night. You can't ignore the fact that Travis is out.
 
Not to mention that even with the 3 point repeat win over Oregon, Washington has nearly as many question marks as FSU.

If you're huffing B1G/SEC farts and really think Bama is undeniably way, way better than FSU, then why not:

1. Michigan
2. Bama
3. Georgia
4. Ohio State
Because of the protocol.
 
The teams are comparable at the margin IMO. If the Conmittee believes so, point 4 applies. If not, it doesn’t play.
If both teams had one loss, then the Jordan Travis part of point 4 would matter, but wins and losses come first. Not to mention FSU has won multiple games without Travis, including over a top 10 Louisville team.
 
Anticipation Popcorn GIF
 
If both teams had one loss, then the Jordan Travis part of point 4 would matter, but wins and losses come first. Not to mention FSU has won multiple games without Travis, including over a top 10 Louisville team.
That’s an incorrect interpretation of the protocol.
 
Back
Top