Looks like Montez may have done some work on shortening his release. The motion looks more compact than what I am used to.
I don't think you'll be upset. Mostly answered questions about contact and whether guys like Pursell and Roberts were developing, how they'll handle OL with Lynott at either C or OG in the fall, etc.I haven't listened to the audio but if he mentions anything non-Football related Sh!+$ about to get real....
I should have added some smiley faces to that last post........but I think you get itI don't think you'll be upset. Mostly answered questions about contact and whether guys like Pursell and Roberts were developing, how they'll handle OL with Lynott at either C or OG in the fall, etc.
Yeah Fisher is surprising but in the pre-spring podcast both Adam and Howell mentioned Falo as a guy who stepped up a ton in workouts so far this year and I'm sure it translated to the football field too. Good to hear too, he was really missed last year.From Adam's Gamboa article, I thought the most interesting thing was Gamboa talking up Falo and Fisher as guys who have stepped up as defensive leaders. I wouldn't have expected them, but it's great to hear that they have turned into that.
Looks like Montez may have done some work on shortening his release. The motion looks more compact than what I am used to.
With the depth we have, why?Can Jay Mac redshirt, or did he burn that already?
He's already RSCan Jay Mac redshirt, or did he burn that already?
Don't get me wrong, I like Jay and think he has a place on the team, but he's clearly been recruited over. And the talent isn't doing anything but improving at WR.Can Jay Mac redshirt, or did he burn that already?
Depth seems deep... while losing Winfree and Ento after this year, my thought process kind of mirrored RS Ento last year....but the point is mootWith the depth we have, why?
How many times does that have to be brought up. No ****ing **** he's been recruited over in terms of talent and other measurables. But as far as clutch performance on 3rd down, and other intangibles, he hasn't been recruited over. Why emphasize it? Nobody here thinks he's a Shenault or Winfree or Westbrook. But he's a critical part of the WR corps, and I don't think that can be debated, especially in view of how the Big3 WR's played last year, as a whole. I get that you said you like JayMac, but the "he's been recruited over" comments are way too often, and too overstated.Don't get me wrong, I like Jay and think he has a place on the team, but he's clearly been recruited over. And the talent isn't doing anything but improving at WR.
When you guys use too many of these ******* without identifiable letters it takes me a while to decipher what F****ing curse word you're referring to....No ****ing ****.
Mike?How many times does that have to be brought up. No ****ing **** he's been recruited over in terms of talent and other measurables. But as far as clutch performance on 3rd down, and other intangibles, he hasn't been recruited over. Why emphasize it? Nobody here thinks he's a Shenault or Winfree or Westbrook. But he's a critical part of the WR corps, and I don't think that can be debated, especially in view of how the Big3 WR's played last year, as a whole. I get that you said you like JayMac, but the "he's been recruited over" comments are way too often, and too overstated.
What's the definition Merriam Webster?I Don’t really think people know what recruited over means. Jay mac is the starting slot receiver and has played a ton the last few years.
When you guys use too many of these ******* without identifiable letters it takes me a while to decipher what F****ing curse word you're referring to....
I live in MI, no familial interest or relation at all. Just a fan of the dudes who get it done on the field despite their being 'recruited over'.Mike?
**** you, you ****face bastard.