When did they have to go to class?The moment the players are no longer required to go to class, aka become professionals, I think that link will be broken.
When did they have to go to class?The moment the players are no longer required to go to class, aka become professionals, I think that link will be broken.
And there it is. I knew you were in there. Thanks for proving me right.
The number of schools with a strong football brand is low. Those schools have those reputations based upon a tradition of success. The only reason why a school like Colorado is lucky enough to be relevant is that we had really good players 30 years ago.Georgetown? They have zero prestige as a football program. Their “stadium” seats 2,500. Don’t confuse university brand with football program brand.
Ahh yes, you’ve nailed it. Great job!It’s okay that you don’t like white people but it’s still racist.
Colorado is relevant because students go to games, have a lot of fun in a great atmosphere, have fond memories of beating Nebraska or getting hammered and rushing the field after beating Oklahoma or because they got laid after some game against Iowa St. They go on to have careers and carry that love of the alma mater with them and if they stay in the area continue to buy tickets and shirts and beers at the game.The number of schools with a strong football brand is low. Those schools have those reputations based upon a tradition of success. The only reason why a school like Colorado is lucky enough to be relevant is that we had really good players 30 years ago.
Ahh yes, you’ve nailed it. Great job!
Dude. Just stop.Why again would there be no money if black kids stopped playing college football? I’ll wait.
If you’re going to ask me to do better on a cherry picked example, you’ll need to do the same. Army/Navy is the only game in the country. Most Army and Navy games each week don’t attract too many viewers unless they have good teams that season.Colorado is relevant because students go to games, have a lot of fun in a great atmosphere, have fond memories of beating ****braska or getting hammered and rushing the field after beating Oklahoma or because they got laid after some game against Iowa St. They go on to have careers and carry that love of the alma mater with them and if they stay in the area continue to buy tickets and shirts and beers at the game.
Loyalty and tradition go a really long way. 68,000 people didn’t attend the Army/Navy game last year because of all the great players.
Dude. Just stop.
Stop being a victim!No. I want his explanation.
Stop being a victim!
I never made that argument. So, there’s no reason for me to answer a question unrelated to my position. Victim!Classic avoiding by you. Answer the question.
Then, there will be no more money. Problem solved!
I never made that argument. So, there’s no reason for me to answer a question unrelated to my position. Victim!
If you think me making fun of you is a representative of my position, then that’s on you.Oh no that’s okay, yes you did. Why are you afraid to answer the question? You stated the opinion.
Deflect deflect deflect!
Here's a different example: Virginia Tech last two years. Went 5-3 and 4-4 in conference play, had to schedule a last minute end-of-season G5 game to get bowl eligible, had exactly one player drafted, still averaged >55k per home game and 3rd best TV ratings in conference.If you’re going to ask me to do better on a cherry picked example, you’ll need to do the same. Army/Navy is the only game in the country. Most Army and Navy games each week don’t attract too many viewers unless they have good teams that season.
If you think me making fun of you is a representative of my position, then that’s on you.
If Virginia Tech weren’t regularly in contention for division/league titles and ranked around the top 25, I’m sure that their TV ratings would be much lower. Even in an off year, VT still fielded much better players than the bulk of FCS teams.Here's a different example: Virginia Tech last two years. Went 5-3 and 4-4 in conference play, had to schedule a last minute end-of-season G5 game to get bowl eligible, had exactly one player drafted, still averaged >55k per home game and 3rd best TV ratings in conference.
It wasn't individual players driving up those attendance and viewership numbers.
You have again figured me out, victim.Can’t even back up what you say, just deflect, change the subject and pretend it meant something else. Love it.
You have again figured me out, victim.
Tell us more about how I’ve victimized you!I know.
Tell us more about how I’ve victimized you!
You think Army/Navy wouldn’t draw on another day? I disagree, but ok how about Harvard/Yale - 45,000 attended that game at Yale (who typically draws about 5,500 to all other home games). They’re not there and ESPN isn’t televising because of the great football players.If you’re going to ask me to do better on a cherry picked example, you’ll need to do the same. Army/Navy is the only game in the country. Most Army and Navy games each week don’t attract too many viewers unless they have good teams that season.
As for CU... as the alumni base ages, without wins that exist because we have great players, the donations will dry up. As college football changes and Colorado continues to fail at this level, there’s a possibility that Colorado is on the outside looking in. As it stands, since we’ve been bad the last 15ish years, we’ve been relegated to worse TV time slots and secondary or tertiary league contracted networks for many games. In the rare times when we are decent or have a high profile opponent, those are the only times when we’re in marquee games. We’ve typically lost those matchups so back to a bad timeslot on the P12 network it goes.
Great talk. I’m not going to reply to you anymore.You think Army/Navy wouldn’t draw on another day? I disagree, but ok how about Harvard/Yale - 45,000 attended that game at Yale (who typically draws about 5,500 to all other home games). They’re not there and ESPN isn’t televising because of the great football players.
I think you’re severely overlooking the role tradition, atmosphere, pomp, school spirit, and the student body plays in the popularity of college football. I love the Buffs and it sure isn’t because of how great they’ve been the last 15 years.
Sure you are, victim. You don’t see color even though the economics of this issue are steeped in racism. But, you don’t see color, so you can’t possibly understand this discussion.Im not victimized at all, I don’t see color in people. But if you would like to talk some more about how the black kids bring in all the revenue I’m sure we would all be thrilled to hear it.
Sure you are, victim. You don’t see color even though the economics of this issue are steeped in racism. But, you don’t see color, so you can’t possibly understand this discussion.