Except his take was exactly right - Venables wasn’t hired to fix OU’s defense, he was hired as a first time HC to replace a guy who won the conference title and finished in the top 10 four of his five seasons there - and went 10-2 in his “down” year. Venables is a great DC, but as a HC he’s an unknown for a blue blood program.Your take is funny. As usual. Venables has been one of the elite ACs in the sport for close to two decades. He's a defensive guy-and OU wasn't good on that side of the ball under Riley. If they get Lebby from Ole Miss to pair with him, they're going to be fine.
I didn’t realize Venables was going to continue being an assistant coach at OU. My bad, carry on.Your take is funny. As usual. Venables has been one of the elite ACs in the sport for close to two decades. He's a defensive guy-and OU wasn't good on that side of the ball under Riley. If they get Lebby from Ole Miss to pair with him, they're going to be fine.
You ever figured out why he hasn’t been a head coach? A waitress at a Norman steakhouse frequented by OU staff said it best to me 20 years ago. Real DCs don’t drink Chardonnay.Your take is funny. As usual. Venables has been one of the elite ACs in the sport for close to two decades. He's a defensive guy-and OU wasn't good on that side of the ball under Riley. If they get Lebby from Ole Miss to pair with him, they're going to be fine.
Daiquiris?You ever figured out why he hasn’t been a head coach? A waitress at a Norman steakhouse frequented by OU staff said it best to me 20 years ago. Real DCs don’t drink Chardonnay.
you've gotta be just trolling at this point. You have thrown out numerous ridiculous takes the past few weeks, it can't be serious.Whatever. OU got better-especially if Jeff Lebby goes there as OC. They'll be good offensively still, and they won't be anywhere near as bad as they were under Riley defensively.
I've put him on ignore, as I came to the conclusion that he frequently doesn't post while sober, and the frequency has been meaningfully increasing the past several months. I'm hoping he gets some help and doesn't continue to spiral.you've gotta be just trolling at this point. You have thrown out numerous ridiculous takes the past few weeks, it can't be serious.
Could this year be the end of Clemson's short run as a dynasty program?
is not posting when sober considered a board faux pas? asking for a friend.I've put him on ignore, as I came to the conclusion that he frequently doesn't post while sober, and the frequency has been meaningfully increasing the past several months. I'm hoping he gets some help and doesn't continue to spiral.
Or it helps refocus them with new ideas.Could this year be the end of Clemson's short run as a dynasty program?
Failed to win division.
Losing DC Venables to OU.
Potentially losing AD Radakovich to Miami.
Potentially losing OC Tony Elliott to one of the several HC jobs he's been linked to.
You’re okay to post drunk musings. Case by case deal.is not posting when sober considered a board faux pas? asking for a friend.
Sure-but of the people that were rurmored to be in play there, he's easily the best fit. Damn good recruiter. Really, really good DC who could call OU's defense if he wanted to (assuming he gets an OC the quality of Jeff Lebby). The Lanning speculation made no sense to at least me-I think he's a pretty good fit at a place like Virginia, but OU has so many former Sooners who are solid ACs/recruiters that you don't need to start from scratch on that staff.Except his take was exactly right - Venables wasn’t hired to fix OU’s defense, he was hired as a first time HC to replace a guy who won the conference title and finished in the top 10 four of his five seasons there - and went 10-2 in his “down” year. Venables is a great DC, but as a HC he’s an unknown for a blue blood program.
I don't give a **** what you think of my takes. Yours suck-starting with the whole idea that the guy who has gotten abused by Utah twice in the last three weeks is excelling at Oregon. ****ing Mark Helfrich got them to the CFP title game-that's one of the dumber things (and there are a lot of them) that I've read on here.you've gotta be just trolling at this point. You have thrown out numerous ridiculous takes the past few weeks, it can't be serious.
The standard is generally the same: if you're not being coherent, be entertaining.is not posting when sober considered a board faux pas? asking for a friend.
Could this year be the end of Clemson's short run as a dynasty program?
Failed to win division.
Losing DC Venables to OU.
Potentially losing AD Radakovich to Miami.
Potentially losing OC Tony Elliott to one of the several HC jobs he's been linked to.
Sounds like a Vic Fangio situation that you’re talking yourself intoSure-but of the people that were rurmored to be in play there, he's easily the best fit. Damn good recruiter. Really, really good DC who could call OU's defense if he wanted to (assuming he gets an OC the quality of Jeff Lebby). The Lanning speculation made no sense to at least me-I think he's a pretty good fit at a place like Virginia, but OU has so many former Sooners who are solid ACs/recruiters that you don't need to start from scratch on that staff.
Still not sure where the “haha” take came from in response to Yak saying Venables, a first time HC, will have a lot to prove at OU…which is true.Sure-but of the people that were rurmored to be in play there, he's easily the best fit. Damn good recruiter. Really, really good DC who could call OU's defense if he wanted to (assuming he gets an OC the quality of Jeff Lebby). The Lanning speculation made no sense to at least me-I think he's a pretty good fit at a place like Virginia, but OU has so many former Sooners who are solid ACs/recruiters that you don't need to start from scratch on that staff.
They do have the top QB in the ‘22 class committed.I can get on board with this.
add: no apparent top shelf QB
Could this year be the end of Clemson's short run as a dynasty program?
Failed to win division.
Losing DC Venables to OU.
Potentially losing AD Radakovich to Miami.
Potentially losing OC Tony Elliott to one of the several HC jobs he's been linked to.
My take, “per usual”, was just too outlandish for ahoel. Not like his takes that a 10 win B1G coach is terrible, a CFP coach with top 5 recruiting classes is overrated and not a good recruiter, and that a career DC is going to make OU better than a proven top 5 HC.Still not sure where the “haha” take came from in response to Yak saying Venables, a first time HC, will have a lot to prove at OU…which is true.
Is he a better fit than Lanning? Maybe, but that’s a whole different argument than your “OU got better” hot take.