What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Thoughts on next year

Corn Manelton

Well-Known Member
The on-field problems that we had this season were based on not being strong enough on both lines and not fast or strong enough at the linebacker positions. Assuming that these current players don't drastically improve, here are some thoughts on how to have the best product possible on the field next year:

Go to a true spread option. This group is not going to be able to consistently pound the rock on anyone. Get wider splits on the O-line, convert Nixon to a scat back position and go into next year with Evans, Lee, Nixon and maybe Fontenot running draw plays and catching passes out of the backfield.

I thought Montez made some big strides this year. He had some very strong passing games and his running got tougher and smarter as the year went on. Our biggest frustrations with him were when the pocket broke down (which happened often). The guy is amazingly skilled at throwing accurately on roll out passes. I never understood why the coaches did'nt adjust so that almost every passing play is a roll out. Montez could be deadly constantly rolling out and giving himself the option to throw OR run the ball. We need to get a top notch personal QB coach in here to specifically work with Montez and bring out the potential in him. If we don't, I'm scared to think he will end his CU career with us all thinking "what could've been".

We should have a more athletic, hungrier group of wide recievers next year and this offense will fit our skill sets the best in my opinion.

On defense, we MUST go out and get as many JUCOs as possible that can play right away. Specifically on defensive line and at linebacker. Convert Bisherat over and go get the meanest, nastiest guys that we can possibly find. If we don't get better athletes on that side of the ball, we are doomed. And I don't think the guys on this year's team (matured by one year) are going to come close to cutting it. Teams exploited the hell out of the fact that we had several defensive players that do not belong on an FBS football field.

On a bright note, I thought the special teams this year werevastly improved from years past and I think this is a sign of good coaching and that better athleticism is slowly starting to trickle into the program.

Frustrating year. We can only hope that the coaches are smart enoughto play to their strengths and address and try to fix the glaring weaknesses.
 
Unless changes are made on staff and they somehow improve this class on the dl and OL more of the same.

Questions at RB,TE,OL,DL, DB,LB

Now Lewis and landman will be good but callier? Will falo be back?

If Oliver leaves, better hope they keep the juco dB and udoffia and wigley up their game.
 
Team should have the pieces to win around 8 games.

Major staff shakeup is needed to fix some issues and get it there, though.
Really? How? The OL will be less functional than it is now, unless you believe three RS Fr. are going to come in and dominate the P12 with Lynott and Miller/Haigler suddenly becoming dominant.

Who totes the rock?

Is there recruiting pipeline to the Shaolin Temple so we can get some more DL?

Eight wins? I don't see it.
 
Really? How? The OL will be less functional than it is now, unless you believe three RS Fr. are going to come in and dominate the P12 with Lynott and Miller/Haigler suddenly becoming dominant.

Who totes the rock?

Is there recruiting pipeline to the Shaolin Temple so we can get some more DL?

Eight wins? I don't see it.
Sometimes it's addition by subtraction, like when Lynott took over a starting spot as a RS-Freshman.
 
I do think it's time for Lindgren to move on. Find a dynamic replacement who's specialty is coaching QBs and knows the spread. We are gonna have to get really creative with the offense. Need to become the Pac 12's Texas Tech. Not ideal I know, but it's the best fit for what we have.
 
I do think it's time for Lindgren to move on. Find a dynamic replacement who's specialty is coaching QBs and knows the spread. We are gonna have to get really creative with the offense. Need to become the Pac 12's Texas Tech. Not ideal I know, but it's the best fit for what we have.
It’s been posted before. I’d take Bob Stitt as an OC.
 
3 most crucial units in a FB, IMO, are the OL, DL and QB. We have 1 out of 3. Unless some real upgrades are made to the OL and DL, Mac is coaching his last season next year.
 
3 most crucial units in a FB, IMO, are the OL, DL and QB. We have 1 out of 3. Unless some real upgrades are made to the OL and DL, Mac is coaching his last season next year.
We have the makings of 1 of 3, and that’s possibly the OL. Some exciting young guys. Montez is not good at all.
 
The team is physically weak compared to the other Pac-12 teams. Even OSU pounded CU, 1-11 OSU.

CU needs a P5 S&C program.

S&C could be better but when we are constantly recruiting HS kids who are 20+ lbs behind the competition and who have clearly lower ceilings all the off-season work in the world isn't going to change how we match up.

It all keeps coming back to recruiting, recruiting, recruiting and then some more recruiting.
 
Sometimes it's addition by subtraction, like when Lynott took over a starting spot as a RS-Freshman.
Nik:

Can you or Duff take a whack at CU depth chart for 2018?

Might be instructive for all to take a look at what might be two-deep before arguing about next year.

Thanks.
 
Unless changes are made on staff and they somehow improve this class on the dl and OL more of the same.

Questions at RB,TE,OL,DL, DB,LB

Now Lewis and landman will be good but callier? Will falo be back?

If Oliver leaves, better hope they keep the juco dB and udoffia and wigley up their game.
if i recall you were asking about DTs in the 90s.

best LBs get crushed with no D Line...Best secondary gets burned with no D-Line.
 
Despite a ridiculously weak OOC slate CU failed to make a bowl in an era when mediocre teams make bowls routinely. Next year will only be tougher with Nebraska having a new coach and playing in Lincoln, CSU always giving us their best shot, and starting with Chip Kelly in conference. If things don't change significantly in some capacity then starting 1-3 is a very real possibility heading into the toughest stretch of the schedule. Add on to that losing a real leader in Phil Lindsay, and the PAC generally having a down year and its hard to be optimistic for next year. Fortunately Folsom is still damn gorgeous and fun to visit even if things don't turn around
 
Despite a ridiculously weak OOC slate CU failed to make a bowl in an era when mediocre teams make bowls routinely. Next year will only be tougher with Nebraska having a new coach and playing in Lincoln, CSU always giving us their best shot, and starting with Chip Kelly in conference. If things don't change significantly in some capacity then starting 1-3 is a very real possibility heading into the toughest stretch of the schedule. Add on to that losing a real leader in Phil Lindsay, and the PAC generally having a down year and its hard to be optimistic for next year. Fortunately Folsom is still damn gorgeous and fun to visit even if things don't turn around

We should have known what this season was going to look like when we couldn't dominate the LOS on either side against that ridiculously weak OOC schedule. UNC, a below average FCS team was able to push our DL off the ball and run on us. Texas State was able create holes to run through and also to negate our pass rush on a consistent basis.

Those are two teams that any P5 team should be able to dominate on pure talent, we couldn't.

On the other side of the ball our OL didn't consistently get push against either one of those teams and they were able to get pressure on our QB. Even with Irwin out that should never happen and that it did shows that we simply don't have the talent on the roster.

We are five years in. Any deficiencies in talent on the roster are the responsibility of the current staff. They haven't gotten the job done on signing day.
 
Our DL was bad this year, but the cupboard was more bare there than any other position. Tulliuma an Umu looked like where Tupou was at that point-2 years out. Mulumba is a stud but still learning. Edwards was the best regarded NT recruit weve had in years. Mysteriously, he doesn’t have the mobility or stamina to stay low. Killer at this level. Don’t know if that can be fixed.

DL could be much better next year.

What worried me was the bad tackling across the board. The fundamentals. Does that mean a lack of intensity in practice? A low intensity culture?
 
Our DL was bad this year, but the cupboard was more bare there than any other position. Tulliuma an Umu looked like where Tupou was at that point-2 years out. Mulumba is a stud but still learning. Edwards was the best regarded NT recruit weve had in years. Mysteriously, he doesn’t have the mobility or stamina to stay low. Killer at this level. Don’t know if that can be fixed.

DL could be much better next year.

What worried me was the bad tackling across the board. The fundamentals. Does that mean a lack of intensity in practice? A low intensity culture?

You just refuse to budge, huh? Only you could be bullish on this DL.

And "more bare than any other position?" Jeffcoat gets a pass for bad DL play AND bad DL recruiting? Must be nice.
 
Last edited:
He needs to lose 25lbs.
And then another, and then another.
You just refuse to budge, huh? Only you could be bullish on this DL.

And "more bare than any other position?" Jeffcoat gets a pass for bad DL play AND bad DL recruiting? Must be nice.

This is the thing. Some schools will carry a position coach who doesn't recruit well because he does outstanding work with developing the players in his group. Some schools will carry a position coach who isn't really a very good coach because he is a difference making recruiter.

I haven't seen anything from Jeffcoat that says he is a positive difference maker either way.
 
The team is physically weak compared to the other Pac-12 teams. Even OSU pounded CU, 1-11 OSU.

CU needs a P5 S&C program.
I really don't think it's the size of our dawgs in the fight. Its mostly the size of the fight in our dawgs this year. Tough to win big when you have small will. S&C might be a small part of it, but certainly not the main issue. The will of this team was nothing like last year's.
 
The team is physically weak compared to the other Pac-12 teams. Even OSU pounded CU, 1-11 OSU.

CU needs a P5 S&C program.
I have no issue with Wilson.

What I have an issue with is the lack of staff the guy has.

I'm not sure most CU fans realize this, but here's a snapshot of what is typical at a P5 program:

Texas Tech S&C Staff Positions
Head Football Strength & Conditioning
Associate Director of Strength & Conditioning
Director of Mobility & Agility
Director of Speed & Power

Then they've got a Sports Dietician, Head Athletic Trainer and Associate Athletic Trainer.

Then they've got a Chief of Staff to manage all the non-assistant personnel for the HC, with a Director of Football Operations, Director of Player Personnel and a Director of Player Development among his core staff. Beyond that, 4 GAs and 3 QCs (like CU has).

What CU really needs to do beyond the 10th assistant is get Wilson a couple dedicated football trainers under him and hire someone like a Bernardi to be a Chief of Staff to take a lot of administrative work off the shoulders of our HC. Without that, we're at a significant competitive disadvantage.

That football infrastructure is more important to me than who our HC is at this point. If CU has the infrastructure, any competent coach will be taking our Buffs to bowl games on an annual basis. And a great coach has the potential to go on a McCartney type run.
 
Team should have the pieces to win around 8 games.

Major staff shakeup is needed to fix some issues and get it there, though.
8 games? Seriously? Everyone projects to be better in the Sourh but us. 2-2 in Non Con is likely. 6 wins is what we should expect.
 
Back
Top