Too soon.
We should have known what this season was going to look like when we couldn't dominate the LOS on either side against that ridiculously weak OOC schedule. UNC, a below average FCS team was able to push our DL off the ball and run on us. Texas State was able create holes to run through and also to negate our pass rush on a consistent basis.
Those are two teams that any P5 team should be able to dominate on pure talent, we couldn't.
On the other side of the ball our OL didn't consistently get push against either one of those teams and they were able to get pressure on our QB. Even with Irwin out that should never happen and that it did shows that we simply don't have the talent on the roster.
We are five years in. Any deficiencies in talent on the roster are the responsibility of the current staff. They haven't gotten the job done on signing day.
After the watching the ****ty performance the first three games this year, I pretty much checked out (yes, I'm aware they were wins, but... holy hell was the team playing ****ty). Only watched games if I had nothing else going on (or couldn't sleep, damn late starts).
Here's how I expect this offseason to go:
MM stays.
He waits until late December to fire a couple coaches.
Several current commitments defect and commit somewhere else; the class ranking ends up in the 50-60 range.
He waits till mid to late February to hire replacements and the 10th assistant.
The new assistants are random guys no one has heard of, from well outside CU's footprint, and they have mediocre (at best) recruiting skills.
Assuming the offseason unfolds that way, I probably won't even bother getting the p12 network next fall - because I'll be completely checked out.
That's ridiculous. You think MM is disinterested now? The AD dictating who will be on staff would make the relationship 10 time more toxic and completely untenable. No head coach would stand for that.This is exactly how I see it playing out if Mac has his way. That’s why RG needs to take initiative and fire Mac’s coordinators for him and hire his replacements for him, in a timely manner. Mac lost the privilege of making head coaching decisions when he hired JD Elliott (yes, I know I got his name wrong, the same way he got some of his defensive players’ names wrong when talking to reporters, after half a year of coaching them)
I have no issue with Wilson.
What I have an issue with is the lack of staff the guy has.
I'm not sure most CU fans realize this, but here's a snapshot of what is typical at a P5 program:
Texas Tech S&C Staff Positions
Head Football Strength & Conditioning
Associate Director of Strength & Conditioning
Director of Mobility & Agility
Director of Speed & Power
Then they've got a Sports Dietician, Head Athletic Trainer and Associate Athletic Trainer.
Then they've got a Chief of Staff to manage all the non-assistant personnel for the HC, with a Director of Football Operations, Director of Player Personnel and a Director of Player Development among his core staff. Beyond that, 4 GAs and 3 QCs (like CU has).
What CU really needs to do beyond the 10th assistant is get Wilson a couple dedicated football trainers under him and hire someone like a Bernardi to be a Chief of Staff to take a lot of administrative work off the shoulders of our HC. Without that, we're at a significant competitive disadvantage.
That football infrastructure is more important to me than who our HC is at this point. If CU has the infrastructure, any competent coach will be taking our Buffs to bowl games on an annual basis. And a great coach has the potential to go on a McCartney type run.
Where do you see us getting the 8 wins? Not being sarcastic, but I only see 6 on there. We go 2-1 in non-con dropping the away game to the Corn (damnit).I think we start next year by going 6-2 and finish 8-4.
I’m a visionary.Where do you see us getting the 8 wins? Not being sarcastic, but I only see 6 on there. We go 2-1 in non-con dropping the away game to the Corn (damnit).
USC and UW are still auto losses to me until we get a real D-Line and O-Line; can’t fake it against superior all around talent.
Oregon State and Washington State are the two wins I see in conference.
We split 2-3 Utah/Arizona/ASU/UCLA and Cal. All 5 programs are headed in the right direction with decent players waiting for a coach.
8-4 is basically what I would consider a dream season.
The first 8 games are:I think we start next year by going 6-2 and finish 8-4.
Okay. You say it isn’t going to happen. But would you admit it is plausible?The first 8 games are:
CSU
@ NU
NH
UCLA
ASU
@USC
@UW
OSU
You think we go 6-2 against that, and then split the following:
@ UA
WSU
UU
@Cal
If we open 6-2, we win 3 of the last 4.
Neither is actually happening.
It's plausible that MM is coaching in Tennessee next year, but even then... No.Okay. You say it isn’t going to happen. But would you admit it is plausible.
NU will be playing it’s second game (I believe) under a new staff and coming off a crap year. UCLA is not very good, will also be under a new staff, and traveling to Boulder. Same for ASU. it’s very plausible that we win those first 5.It's plausible that MM is coaching in Tennessee next year, but even then... No.
The DL (and OL) is going to take more than one offseason to fix - and we're not opening 5-0 next year without fixing the lines (because that's what it will take to open 6-2).
Best to wait until coaching staff is finalized and how much player attrition there is.
Wow.I think we start next year by going 6-2 and finish 8-4.
If the new coach is Frost, Nebraska wins handily, IMO. Also, UCLA has elite level talent across the board that had been underperforming/coached down. If Chip can find a QB to run his system, that game could be ugly. At best, I think we're 4-4 through the first 8 games, with an opportunity to win 3 of the last 4NU will be playing it’s second game (I believe) under a new staff and coming off a crap year. UCLA is not very good, will also be under a new staff, and traveling to Boulder. Same for ASU. it’s very plausible that we win those first 5.
We ain’t losing to Nebraska. As bad as we are, they’re much worse.Where do you see us getting the 8 wins? Not being sarcastic, but I only see 6 on there. We go 2-1 in non-con dropping the away game to the Corn (damnit).
USC and UW are still auto losses to me until we get a real D-Line and O-Line; can’t fake it against superior all around talent.
Oregon State and Washington State are the two wins I see in conference.
We split 2-3 Utah/Arizona/ASU/UCLA and Cal. All 5 programs are headed in the right direction with decent players waiting for a coach.
8-4 is basically what I would consider a dream season.
We ain’t losing to Nebraska. As bad as we are, they’re much worse.
Tell that to Northern Illinois.Road games against P5 teams are rarely auto wins.
Road games against P5 teams are rarely auto wins.
The first 8 games are:
CSU
@ NU
NH
UCLA
ASU
@USC
@UW
OSU
You think we go 6-2 against that, and then split the following:
@ UA
WSU
UU
@Cal
If we open 6-2, we win 3 of the last 4.
Neither is actually happening.
Tell that to Northern Illinois.
Do you have no sense of humor at all?Which will have little to do with a game between CU and NU in 2018.
Do you have no sense of humor at all?
There’s that. There’s also the issue of NEVER, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, do we ever acknowledge the even remote possibility that a loss to the Fuskers could possibly happen. We are the Buffs, dammit. And while we may suck, Nebraska always sucks more. Always.I do. I know you are talking low-level smack.
There’s that. There’s also the issue of NEVER, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, do we ever acknowledge the even remote possibility that a loss to the Fuskers could possibly happen. We are the Buffs, dammit. And while we may suck, Nebraska always sucks more. Always.
Why are fire engines red?I do. I know you are talking low-level smack.