Oh myThrow out the first 3 seasons where he turned around the worst program in D1 and he gets 10 wins about every other year.
Oh myThrow out the first 3 seasons where he turned around the worst program in D1 and he gets 10 wins about every other year.
I just wonder how Wisconsin does it. Starting this year and going back to the 2010 class, their 247 rankings have been 44, 39, 35, 41, 32, 40, 65, 44, 46
In that same time frame, they've gone to a bowl game every year, won their division 6/8 years, won the BIG 3 times and subsequently gone to 3 Rose Bowls (2010, 11, 12), have wins in the Outback, Holiday, Cotton and Orange bowls, won 10 or more games 6 times and their worst season was Beilema's last in 2012 where they went 8-6 (still played in the Rose Bowl that season, btw). Un****ingbelievable.
Our “brand” is ranked below Baylor somehow to recruits
They're definitely an aberration when it comes to to correlating recruiting classes to high-level success. I think a big part of it is their walk-on program combined with their style of play bringing in alot of big, physical kids and playing a style that makes the most advantage out of those type of players. It's probably similar to how Nebraska was doing it in the 80's and 90's - that was in the pre-recruiting rankings era but I'd be willing to bet that Nebraska's classes during that time wouldn't have ranked very high on a consistent basis. Those Nebraska teams put a ton of emphasis on their walk-on program, played a similar style, and both of these schools are the only FBS program in their respective states.
Our “brand” is ranked below Baylor somehow to recruits
Our “brand” is ranked below Baylor somehow to recruits
True if we win 10 in 2018. Can walk you through the calculus.That is false.
View attachment 25005
True if we win 10 in 2018. Can walk you through the calculus.
Syko, you perhaps should read his original post, the calculus is explained. You son, are completely missing the point.So by your logic, if MM doesn't have a major laden senior squad, he loses more than he wins. So we should expect another losing season in 2018 correct?
On the other hand, you said your calculus spit out 10 win seasons every other year.
I see a 7-5 season in 2018.
Syko, you perhaps should read his original post, the calculus is explained. You son, are completely missing the point.
Guys, the mere fact that Alabama is the #19 brand in college football tells you all you need to know about how screwed up this thing is.
Our “brand” is ranked below Baylor somehow to recruits
I kind of shake my head over 247s class rankings. ASU had 2 four stars to the Buffs 1, and 19 three stars to the Buffs 20; Yet they're ranked 16 spots higher. I don't really believe that their 3* guys are that much better than ours.
As I think about this class, I see myself rationalizing that it is decent. On deeper thought, I realize that we are so far away from competing at the highest levels of college football with the current staff. As each year goes by, I am falling into the camp that says we are permanently relegated to being a 6th-8th place conference team on average.
Nah, we're just the tortoise v the hare, and hopefully when we return to regularly above average, the administration won't let us fall again.As I think about this class, I see myself rationalizing that it is decent. On deeper thought, I realize that we are so far away from competing at the highest levels of college football with the current staff. As each year goes by, I am falling into the camp that says we are permanently relegated to being a 6th-8th place conference team on average.
I think we have some small but real, sustainable growth and a teeny bit of momentum left from 2016 that, if we win at least 7 this year, will translate to recruiting better in the trenches. I think you're a tad too pessimistic, though I totally understand how you arrive to that point. I'm taking the long view, and think the trajectory is toward the top half of Pac12 by the end of 2020, and 3rd thru 5th by 2023. I know I'm crazy, but BnG KoolAid is what I drink.As I think about this class, I see myself rationalizing that it is decent. On deeper thought, I realize that we are so far away from competing at the highest levels of college football with the current staff. As each year goes by, I am falling into the camp that says we are permanently relegated to being a 6th-8th place conference team on average.
You do know how the score for those rankings, right? This year’s class is better than last year’s even though it “ranks” lower. Or at least the class is about the same. I do agree that we have to be much better.I give the class a D. Mostly because I was told “it’s ok that MacIntyre keeps making phenomenally stupid coaching decisions at crucial moments that cost us games, because his recruiting keeps getting better”. His latest class is ranked like 20 spots below his previous class, but I’m sure he will beat USC & UCLA with this type of recruiting combined with his game day coaching
Jesus. You guys are so freaking bitter. This is a good class for the state of the program. You guys expect way too much. It’s great to have expectations, but most of AllBuffs think that this is still the buffs from the early 90s and we were still relevant to blue chip players. We aren’t, and may never be again.I give the class a D. Mostly because I was told “it’s ok that MacIntyre keeps making phenomenally stupid coaching decisions at crucial moments that cost us games, because his recruiting keeps getting better”. His latest class is ranked like 20 spots below his previous class, but I’m sure he will beat USC & UCLA with this type of recruiting combined with his game day coaching