What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Official realignment thread - SEC formally invites OU and Texas to join the conference in 2025

Old Ball Coach

EDIT: Or, more accurately, the "ol' ball coach"

EDIT EDIT: Missed Lefty's reply above. I suck.
ok. that you and left both knew it makes me feel deficient, but then I recalled that none of the thousands of people who edit Wikipedia apparently knew it
 
ok. that you and left both knew it makes me feel deficient, but then I recalled that none of the thousands of people who edit Wikipedia apparently knew it
Duff, Lefty, and NWD are all wrong anyway, don’t feel bad. He’s known as the “Head Ball Coach”
 
Duff, Lefty, and NWD are all wrong anyway, don’t feel bad. He’s known as the “Head Ball Coach”
ok, ok. I didn't realize OBC (HBC?) was a label specific to Spurrier. The only nickname I recall for him was "Steve Superior"
 
I think in a 32 team league that includes the Pac 12, B1G, ND and 5 other programs, there would be plenty of content for multiple networks to have large distribution deals. That's the only way they'd be able to double up on the SEC/ESPN deal
Too many teams that would be a drag on per team revs.
 
Hey all - want to join me at the SEC picnic on August 28th? Should be interesting. And I've already told hubby that I will cease going after the UT & OU yokels start showing up. I can handle the regular ol' SEC folk but I don't want to be near the ol' Big 12 clowns.
 
Also the nfl has pretty much equal revenue sharing. It works and lifts all boats and it is a proven model. I know it is probably a pipe dream but this would be the ultimate **** you to the sec

isnt that pretty communist?
 
Nah, the SEC sort of moves independent of the NFL since nearly half the states don’t even have professional teams and college football is clearly king in Georgia and Florida anyways.

The problems in sports starts from below. NFL is a gleaming ship, but little pinholes are forming below the waterline.
 
The problems in sports starts from below. NFL is a gleaming ship, but little pinholes are forming below the waterline.
Unless these leagues start playing on Sundays (hint: they won't), it has no impact on the NFL. As oneal said, if anything it's a consolidation of talent and elite programs and likely develops players better for the NFL
 
Unless these leagues start playing on Sundays (hint: they won't), it has no impact on the NFL. As oneal said, if anything it's a consolidation of talent and elite programs and likely develops players better for the NFL

Plus I think that some people could start jumping ship if college football loses what currently sets it apart from the NFL.

The dangers for the NFL lie elsewhere.
 
The health of the NFL is tied directly to having a pipeline of players and popularity of the sport across all regions. Pee Wee football participation is way, way down. High school participation is down, but more so in some areas than others. The sport has largely been abandoned in the northeast. It’s not faring particularly well out west. Concentrating the college game as a regional sport played in the southeast is not good for the game. Realignment, in my opinion, will likely contribute to further regionalization of the game. And when other regions are not invested, they lose interest. Does anyone really think Colorado and it’s surrounding states are ever going to produce the talent that’s coming into Alabama, Georgia, Florida? It’s laughable. And when all the cash and talent gets concentrated into16 schools (really 10) in the southeast, you have a regional sport. Couple that with issues in how TV and sports are consumed (or rather the highly fractured market), there are problems ahead.
 
Plus I think that some people could start jumping ship if college football loses what currently sets it apart from the NFL.

The dangers for the NFL lie elsewhere.
No - there is danger for the NFL here as well.

The talent pool for the NFL is likely to shrink.

The end result of these moves makes it less likely that a merely good football player can pay for college playing football. Which really does mean that fewer kids will play football.

There are many parts of the country where high school leagues are shrinking or disappearing. While the reasons they are shrinking are independent from this, taking a bunch of scholarships to good schools out of the picture just accelerates that trend.

Edit: and what Cree said.
 
The health of the NFL is tied directly to having a pipeline of players and popularity of the sport across all regions. Pee Wee football participation is way, way down. High school participation is down, but more so in some areas than others. The sport has largely been abandoned in the northeast. It’s not faring particularly well out west. Concentrating the college game as a regional sport played in the southeast is not good for the game. Realignment, in my opinion, will likely contribute to further regionalization of the game. And when other regions are not invested, they lose interest. Does anyone really think Colorado and it’s surrounding states are ever going to produce the talent that’s coming into Alabama, Georgia, Florida? It’s laughable. And when all the cash and talent gets concentrated into16 schools (really 10) in the southeast, you have a regional sport. Couple that with issues in how TV and sports are consumed (or rather the highly fractured market), there are problems ahead.

No - there is danger for the NFL here as well.

The talent pool for the NFL is likely to shrink.

The end result of these moves makes it less likely that a merely good football player can pay for college playing football. Which really does mean that fewer kids will play football.

There are many parts of the country where high school leagues are shrinking or disappearing. While the reasons they are shrinking are independent from this, taking a bunch of scholarships to good schools out of the picture just accelerates that trend.

Edit: and what Cree said.

Fair points if you approach it from those angles, although those points largely concern the game as a whole and not just the NFL.
 
Back
Top