Try Ol' Ball Coach. I bet it fits.
Well, that's a rather esoteric initializationTry Ol' Ball Coach. I bet it fits.
IDK...Well, that's a rather esoteric initialization
I shiver with antici...IDK...
..whatever it is, it is surely a BFD.I shiver with antici...
...pation
waiting for what's coming after those ellipses
Old Ball Coach
ok. that you and left both knew it makes me feel deficient, but then I recalled that none of the thousands of people who edit Wikipedia apparently knew itOld Ball Coach
EDIT: Or, more accurately, the "ol' ball coach"
EDIT EDIT: Missed Lefty's reply above. I suck.
Duff, Lefty, and NWD are all wrong anyway, don’t feel bad. He’s known as the “Head Ball Coach”ok. that you and left both knew it makes me feel deficient, but then I recalled that none of the thousands of people who edit Wikipedia apparently knew it
ok, ok. I didn't realize OBC (HBC?) was a label specific to Spurrier. The only nickname I recall for him was "Steve Superior"Duff, Lefty, and NWD are all wrong anyway, don’t feel bad. He’s known as the “Head Ball Coach”
Too many teams that would be a drag on per team revs.I think in a 32 team league that includes the Pac 12, B1G, ND and 5 other programs, there would be plenty of content for multiple networks to have large distribution deals. That's the only way they'd be able to double up on the SEC/ESPN deal
Right. The total deal would have to be double what the SEC deal is for each program to get on the same financial level, but that’s not really the point of all this is itToo many teams that would be a drag on per team revs.
Nah, the SEC sort of moves independent of the NFL since nearly half the states don’t even have professional teams and college football is clearly king in Georgia and Florida anyways.Biggest loser in this is the NFL.
Also the nfl has pretty much equal revenue sharing. It works and lifts all boats and it is a proven model. I know it is probably a pipe dream but this would be the ultimate **** you to the sec
Nah, the SEC sort of moves independent of the NFL since nearly half the states don’t even have professional teams and college football is clearly king in Georgia and Florida anyways.
ok. that you and left both knew it makes me feel deficient, but then I recalled that none of the thousands of people who edit Wikipedia apparently knew it
Biggest loser in this is the NFL.
If anything, a super league helps the NFL. It would be even better for development of young playersThe problems in sports starts from below. NFL is a gleaming ship, but little pinholes are forming below the waterline.
I'm a huge fan of lmgtfy, but that was even less helpful than the search I did prior to asking, which led me to the wiki page I linked.LMGTFY - Let Me Google That For You
For all those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than to Google it for themselves.lmgtfy.app
Unless these leagues start playing on Sundays (hint: they won't), it has no impact on the NFL. As oneal said, if anything it's a consolidation of talent and elite programs and likely develops players better for the NFLThe problems in sports starts from below. NFL is a gleaming ship, but little pinholes are forming below the waterline.
He means emails. UBL?"Digital Docs have been swapped."
Unless these leagues start playing on Sundays (hint: they won't), it has no impact on the NFL. As oneal said, if anything it's a consolidation of talent and elite programs and likely develops players better for the NFL
The health of the NFL is tied directly to having a pipeline of players and popularity of the sport across all regions. Pee Wee football participation is way, way down. High school participation is down, but more so in some areas than others. The sport has largely been abandoned in the northeast. It’s not faring particularly well out west. Concentrating the college game as a regional sport played in the southeast is not good for the game. Realignment, in my opinion, will likely contribute to further regionalization of the game. And when other regions are not invested, they lose interest. Does anyone really think Colorado and it’s surrounding states are ever going to produce the talent that’s coming into Alabama, Georgia, Florida? It’s laughable. And when all the cash and talent gets concentrated into16 schools (really 10) in the southeast, you have a regional sport. Couple that with issues in how TV and sports are consumed (or rather the highly fractured market), there are problems ahead.How?
No - there is danger for the NFL here as well.Plus I think that some people could start jumping ship if college football loses what currently sets it apart from the NFL.
The dangers for the NFL lie elsewhere.
The health of the NFL is tied directly to having a pipeline of players and popularity of the sport across all regions. Pee Wee football participation is way, way down. High school participation is down, but more so in some areas than others. The sport has largely been abandoned in the northeast. It’s not faring particularly well out west. Concentrating the college game as a regional sport played in the southeast is not good for the game. Realignment, in my opinion, will likely contribute to further regionalization of the game. And when other regions are not invested, they lose interest. Does anyone really think Colorado and it’s surrounding states are ever going to produce the talent that’s coming into Alabama, Georgia, Florida? It’s laughable. And when all the cash and talent gets concentrated into16 schools (really 10) in the southeast, you have a regional sport. Couple that with issues in how TV and sports are consumed (or rather the highly fractured market), there are problems ahead.
No - there is danger for the NFL here as well.
The talent pool for the NFL is likely to shrink.
The end result of these moves makes it less likely that a merely good football player can pay for college playing football. Which really does mean that fewer kids will play football.
There are many parts of the country where high school leagues are shrinking or disappearing. While the reasons they are shrinking are independent from this, taking a bunch of scholarships to good schools out of the picture just accelerates that trend.
Edit: and what Cree said.