Thank you, comrade.This is capitalist America. I am sure you can work the rest out yourself.
Thank you, comrade.This is capitalist America. I am sure you can work the rest out yourself.
Top 48 still cuts off 21 p5 programs. Are we top 48? Hopefully. Even then, does it change it so much that it's not even really "college" football anymore?There are now 69(?) P5 programs. If the P2 hold at 32 total, that means alienating half the P5 college football landscape, and would probably also kill off the G5. Most of those 32 markets are actually small markets in the Midwest and the South, w/r/t population, and the large markets that are captured (LA and NY) are mostly apathetic toward CFB.
The NFL is the most popular league by a wide margin because it incorporates almost the entire country.
The networks and schools have shown they have zero respect for tradition. It will be hard but it will happen. I think we end up with 40-48 school league that has a few B1G and SEC schools on the outside looking in.i think it will be hard to exclude anyone who is currently in a p5 conference.
Yes please make sure you get your left wing politics into the equation.This is capitalist America. I am sure you can work the rest out yourself.
This is exactly what I was saying yesterday. The battle isn’t about money or exposure, it’s about being left behind willingly (joining B12), unwillingly (staying w/ P12 + potentially getting shafted later on) or possibly joining the party by battling it out w/ Prime and winning big against teams that will have an invite to the party (UW, Oregon).
Red pill or blue pill.
Yes please make sure you get your left wing politics into the equation.
Blue pill - move to the B12. No longer have to worry about competing on the big stage. Steady money. Stability. No upside or grand aspirations but no drama either. Live the underdog, outsider life of the B12.What would each pill represent in this case?
Blue pill - move to the B12. No longer have to worry about competing on the big stage. Steady money. Stability. No upside or grand aspirations but no drama either. Live the underdog, outsider life of the B12.
Red pill - stay with the P12. Compete against teams vying for a spot in the next round of realignment in the next few years. Risk getting burned by fellow P12 members. Reward is joining them on the big stage.
i'd take the old big 8 back in a minute if that were possible.
first we let the ****ing texans into the big 8 and they ****ed us all over. then, we and nu and mizzery figure we don't want to be junior ****ing partners to texas and seek alternate arrangements. then, the ****ing pac ****s the bed over and over. then usc does us dirty and here we are.
THIS big 12 is not the same as the old big 8/12. it isn't even close.
maybe northwestern will get the death penalty. for some reason, that would somehow make me feel a bit better.
This is capitalist America. I am sure you can work the rest out yourself.
Yes please make sure you get your left wing politics into the equation.
This isn't as complicated as Victory's silly matrix analogy would lead one to believe. Speaking of which.......doesn't Qanon talk about red pill/blue pill?Blue pill - move to the B12. No longer have to worry about competing on the big stage. Steady money. Stability. No upside or grand aspirations but no drama either. Live the underdog, outsider life of the B12.
Red pill - stay with the P12. Compete against teams vying for a spot in the next round of realignment in the next few years. Risk getting burned by fellow P12 members. Reward is joining them on the big stage.
If Apple comes up with let's say 32 million per school and it's 100% streaming, I find it hard to imagine all 10 signing.This isn't as complicated as Victory's silly matrix analogy would lead one to believe. Speaking of which.......doesn't Qanon talk about red pill/blue pill?
Show us the money, George. If you can do it, we stay. If you can't, we're out. That simple.
If Apple comes up with let's say 32 million per school and it's 100% streaming, I find it hard to imagine all 10 signing.
How many times do I have to mention that the Big12 deal has 70% linear?It must be hard for you to imagine that CU might have been working with UA to use the threat of relocation to the B12 as leverage for a better P12 media rights deal. CU isn't the first nor will be the last school to be used as leverage in media rights deals negotiations. CU can do this because they have multiple conference options in that case.
With streaming platforms, content is very important and Coach Prime is a type of content people will watch. The B12 is still going to be heavy on streaming anyway and not every CU game would be on linear TV since every B12 school would have to be on a minimum number of linear TV slots.
If we go 100% streaming, the schools would have more of the power to determine game start times with better attendance which leads to better ticket revenue which leads to more overall money earned for the AD. It's time to take the power back from the television partners. If we get $32M for streaming only and can determine our game times, there should be good gains in gameday revenue if the host schools do it right. Maybe we will see less empty seats at some notable P12 stadiums as a result.
How is it his fault if no one is offering money? USC and UCLA left with the biggest brand in the conference and the largest TV market in the USA. How is that his fault?They have to announce the deal before media day. I’d have a hard time seeing the upside if they can’t get it done by then. Also, I’d say it’s fair to fire Kliavkoff if no deal is announced by then.
That would be a good start.The NFL can’t play on Saturday because the 1961 sports broadcasting act wanted to protect colleges from the monopoly power of the NFL. SEC/B1G push this too far and what’s to keep legislators in left behind states from letting the NFL compete with CFB?
The defacto outcome you describe is ultimately bad for the NFL. If only 40 programs control the A level game there will not be enough talent to support 32 NFL teams. Certainly at the QB position where 100 college teams Today cant produce enough elite QBs.Got to agree with Hokie...I would not be surprised if CU already has been left behind. Let's assume that the P2 break away and form Division S for football or something like that. I don't think CU makes the cut at this point but CU should be able to be one of those top teams in D1 if the school gets behind the football team.
The B12 appears to know that a fate like that is going to happen and is investing more in basketball. I'm not certain if the P12 is thinking the same way because all the news is about the media rights deal and nothing else. The P12 isn't much different from the B12 sans USC & UCLA.
Like I have said in the past, good football is not exclusive to FBS football.
Its not NCAA sanctioned where as all other College Football games are.I've been hokie'd I know, but the CFP National Championship is a real thing and that's what I am referring to
The ****tiest not ****ty preview everA quick look at the Big 12 membership and the conference culture:
Baylor- the home of Art Briles, a basketball murder coverup, Kim Mulkey and her public support of Briles & lack of it for Griner - basically all built on the Ken Starr blueprint for a university
BYU- they are what they are, a place that donated and drove the challenge in California against marriage equality working with Ken Starr while he was at Pepperdine), has codified restrictions on professorial academic freedom and has a student code of conduct so draconian that they suspended a hoops player from the Dance for having sex with his girlfriend
Cincinnati- the first home of Bob Huggins where he had a 0.0% graduation rate and then the place that hired Tommy Tuberville
Houston- Art Briles cut his teeth here and now have Dana Holgerson who even West Virginia thought drank too much, and also hired Kelvin Sampson for MBB who had previously been nailed for recruiting violations at Oklahoma, was run out of the basketball coaches association for rules violations and was so dirty that Indiana officials had to apologize for hiring at the time they canned him
Iowa State-
Kansas- stuck by a coach implicated as a cheater by the FBI because they'll do anything for their MBB program (and they got their first natty since Larry Brown was there breaking rules), but otherwise they're fine
Kansas State- home of the largest inferiority complex in college athletics, desperately hired Huggins from Cincy and looked the other way because beating KU would be all that mattered, in football was willing to become a JUCO finishing school to no longer suck
Oklahoma State- home of all time greats like Dexter Manley who was able to pass his classes despite being illiterate, a FB coach in Mike Gundy who is a known racist, and a hoops program that hasn't done much before or since Eddie Sutton fled the scandal he created at Kentucky to go there and become the model for its peers by getting nailed for a DUI at 70 years old
TCU-
Texas Tech- couldn't win even when they had Mahomes at QB, has a culture defined by hiring Bobby Knight and Tommy Tuberville, even going so far as to consider Art Briles
UCF- happy to hire O'Leary after Notre Dame canceled him for falsifying his resume, one of the worst academic cheating scandals (punishment was that hundreds of students had to take an ethics class, not suspension or expulsion), now a cheating controversy over loaded bats in baseball, love them some Scott Frost
West Virginia- when they're not burning couches and abusing Oxy, they are committed to providing a safe place for drunk coaches like Huggins and Holgerson to be themselves as long as they win enough
It's basically a conference with the same m.o. as the old SWAC with some old time religion thrown into the mix which has seen every university with the chops to leave rushing out the door.
It’s his job to produce the returns and results. It’s not personal I just believe at the c-level there has to be timely results and if it’s not met in time then that’s a wrap given the compensation. I think >1 year is fair.How is it his fault if no one is offering money? USC and UCLA left with the biggest brand in the conference and the largest TV market in the USA. How is that his fault?
We need to know a lot more details before pronouncing that he should fired.
If Apple comes up with let's say 32 million per school and it's 100% streaming, I find it hard to imagine all 10 signing
I'm confused. Why would CU and UA threatening to leave the Pac 12 have any leverage to get a better P12 media rights deal?It must be hard for you to imagine that CU might have been working with UA to use the threat of relocation to the B12 as leverage for a better P12 media rights deal. CU isn't the first nor will be the last school to be used as leverage in media rights deals negotiations. CU can do this because they have multiple conference options in that case.
With streaming platforms, content is very important and Coach Prime is a type of content people will watch. The B12 is still going to be heavy on streaming anyway and not every CU game would be on linear TV since every B12 school would have to be on a minimum number of linear TV slots.
If we go 100% streaming, the schools would have more of the power to determine game start times with better attendance which leads to better ticket revenue which leads to more overall money earned for the AD. It's time to take the power back from the television partners. If we get $32M for streaming only and can determine our game times, there should be good gains in gameday revenue if the host schools do it right. Maybe we will see less empty seats at some notable P12 stadiums as a result.
When PAC MAN is posting these takes you know things are looking upIt must be hard for you to imagine that CU might have been working with UA to use the threat of relocation to the B12 as leverage for a better P12 media rights deal. CU isn't the first nor will be the last school to be used as leverage in media rights deals negotiations. CU can do this because they have multiple conference options in that case.
With streaming platforms, content is very important and Coach Prime is a type of content people will watch. The B12 is still going to be heavy on streaming anyway and not every CU game would be on linear TV since every B12 school would have to be on a minimum number of linear TV slots.
If we go 100% streaming, the schools would have more of the power to determine game start times with better attendance which leads to better ticket revenue which leads to more overall money earned for the AD. It's time to take the power back from the television partners. If we get $32M for streaming only and can determine our game times, there should be good gains in gameday revenue if the host schools do it right. Maybe we will see less empty seats at some notable P12 stadiums as a result.