SINKRATZ
PhD in Analogy
if he can still own the gym while being a member of staff then I see this as a tremendous win.
I see that as a potential compliance nightmare.
if he can still own the gym while being a member of staff then I see this as a tremendous win.
I see that as a potential compliance nightmare.
I get that a tweet during negotiations may not be professional, but who cares. Since when did we begin to give a **** about professionalism? It's either a good hire or it isn't.
Probably because this won't be the last time this happens with him... and it will probably only get worse once he's actually hired. Anyways...
This has to be the week we hire a DC right? Any day now
I think both these scenarios are possible. Who knows we could still make a splash hire not from a team still active but I think all signs point to HCMM giving up on a big splash and going for someone young who aligns with his philosophy and is willing to learn from HCMM.At this point, it has to be a current staff member of Oregon, Florida State, Seattle Seahawks, Green Bay Packers, Indianapolis Colts, or NE Patriots. If it's not someone on one of those 6 staffs, it will be a "low key" hire and MM will essentially be the DC. There is no other explanation or excuse for it taking this long.
I think both these scenarios are possible. Who knows we could still make a splash hire not from a team still active but I think all signs point to HCMM giving up on a big splash and going for someone young who aligns with his philosophy and is willing to learn from HCMM.
I also believe the thought inside the program is the two hires have to great recruiters, first and foremost, and defensive coaches as secondary priorities. I mean, let's face it. MM "fired" Baer because their ideas on stopping P12 offenses didn't align. Therefore it's going to be MM's defense in 2015 and whoever he hires as the "Defensive Coordinator" will just be his "yes man" and play caller. I'm not totally opposed to that by any means, as long as the two coaches they bring in can recruit their asses off.
He'd have to sell his interests in the company. Now, maybe he could sell to his wife or brother or uncle or something. That I do not know.I agree. It also would be an advantage at evaluating a lot of things about in state kids. Really interested to see how this works out.
THANKS FOR THE CLARIFICATION!!!!!Message to everbody: McChesney is NOT coaching the defense. Strength coach only.
I thought his tweets were pretty clear. Apparently not
Kind of hard to believe it'd be an NFL guy, but who knows?At this point, it has to be a current staff member of Oregon, Florida State, Seattle Seahawks, Green Bay Packers, Indianapolis Colts, or NE Patriots. If it's not someone on one of those 6 staffs, it will be a "low key" hire and MM will essentially be the DC. There is no other explanation or excuse for it taking this long.
If you believe that's what MM wants, then no wonder he's having a hard time. I don't think it's quite that extreme. If you're not going to let your coaches coach, they won't want to come here or stay here because there's no growth in that type of arrangement.
Kind of hard to believe it'd be an NFL guy, but who knows?
I think at this point if I were MacIntyre I would look at someone like Nick Aliotti to be DC. He is at the end of his career and does not have to worry about his future as much. Give him a 3 year $600k/year contract. He knows the pac 12 offenses and then MacIntyre does not have mentor someone in the DC job. Plus CU would actually get value for the money instead of overpaying some young guy to take a career risks.
At this point I expect the new DC to be much like our recruiting.
At this point, it has to be a current staff member of Oregon, Florida State, Seattle Seahawks, Green Bay Packers, Indianapolis Colts, or NE Patriots. If it's not someone on one of those 6 staffs, it will be a "low key" hire and MM will essentially be the DC. There is no other explanation or excuse for it taking this long.
You know Ohio State is in the championship game right?
But CU would get ZERO recruiting lift from that sort of hire.
We had a chance to make a signature hire. To make an upgrade. And Perhaps we still do.
That being said this hire was seemingly derailed, like the attempts to hire before settling on MacIntyre, and the way we hired Embree. They all play into the theory that we've become a bit of a graveyard of college football. How we repair that Im not quite sure. Other than taking a lot of time with a single coach and having a lot of patience until he can get a better staff together that can improve recruiting.
But CU would get ZERO recruiting lift from that sort of hire.
I don't know if you are trying to be sarcastic, but CU is not going to get any recruiting bounce this cycle regardless. But Aliotti is considered a very good recruiter with deep ties in the Bay Area of California where he is from - Oregon thought losing his connections there was going to be a big hit to their recruiting that area.