Maybe good, not great.If the plan is to replace KD with EB. I would rather keep KD. He is the proven guy. But I may be wrong. EB might be the better coach. I don't know. I don't have all of the information. But I do know EB is a great recruiter.
Question for you-do you honestly believe McDumb**** is more qualified to be an NFL HC than Leftwich or EB are? I definitely do not.Lol the guy arguing in favor of Kapernick is telling someone else they have a bad take. He is an average / below average quarterback who started whining the second he got benched. That's why he's not in the league, not racism. If you want to believe a GM would rather lose a Super Bowl with a white head coach than win one with a black head coach, you're fine to believe that but it's retarded
You’re right that they’d rather win. The problem is who they always seem to put their faith in to achieve a SB win.Lol the guy arguing in favor of Kapernick is telling someone else they have a bad take. He is an average / below average quarterback who started whining the second he got benched. That's why he's not in the league, not racism. If you want to believe a GM would rather lose a Super Bowl with a white head coach than win one with a black head coach, you're fine to believe that but it's retarded
For all his faults from his time in Denver, there is zero question that McDaniels is an offensive “genius”. His ability over the years to gameplan and play call to whatever the matchup is pretty amazing. He also just made Mac Jones a ROY candidate.Question for you-do you honestly believe McDumb**** is more qualified to be an NFL HC than Leftwich or EB are? I definitely do not.
I've never talked to any of them, I have no idea who the better coach would be.Question for you-do you honestly believe McDumb**** is more qualified to be an NFL HC than Leftwich or EB are? I definitely do not.
Who recruited Marcus Houston and the kid that transfered to USF?Maybe good, not great.
Eric Bieniemy All Time Recruits
247sports.com
Yeah and for all the people decrying how unfair it is that EB may be looked upon unfavorably because of his disastrous stint at CU, I would remind them that McDaniels stint as Denver HC was even longer ago and he was younger at the time. If EB can learn to be a better coach with experience, maybe McDaniels can too?For all his faults from his time in Denver, there is zero question that McDaniels is an offensive “genius”. His ability over the years to gameplan and play call to whatever the matchup is pretty amazing. He also just made Mac Jones a ROY candidate.
“Qualified” is not a term I would keep using in this argument. There are a lot of qualified guys, including McDaniels, and the Raiders new GM, who came from the Pats, hiring him as HC does not point to racism in any way, shape, or form.
If the plan is to replace KD with EB. I would rather keep KD. He is the proven guy. But I may be wrong. EB might be the better coach. I don't know. I don't have all of the information. But I do know EB is a great recruiter.
You know who else was an "offensive genius"? Norv Turner. Just because a guy is a great coordinator doesn't mean they're going to be a great HC. On McDaniels-there's what happened in Denver. He was 5-17 after the 6-0 start his first year. That's pathetic. He did a god awful job with this roster. He got caught cheating. Let's talk about the Indianapolis fiasco now-how did that happen?For all his faults from his time in Denver, there is zero question that McDaniels is an offensive “genius”. His ability over the years to gameplan and play call to whatever the matchup is pretty amazing. He also just made Mac Jones a ROY candidate.
“Qualified” is not a term I would keep using in this argument. There are a lot of qualified guys, including McDaniels, and the Raiders new GM, who came from the Pats, hiring him as HC does not point to racism in any way, shape, or form.
One black HC and the Raiders hiring McDaniels has nothing to do with that. He is about as “qualified” as it gets if a team is willing to overlook his first 1.5 year stint when he was 32 years old.One black HC. McDaniels is more likely this generation's Norv Turner than anything-very good coordinator, but dog**** as an HC.
Waiting for you to defend what happened between him and the Colts.One black HC and the Raiders hiring McDaniels has nothing to do with that. He is about as “qualified” as it gets if a team is willing to overlook his first 1.5 year stint when he was 32 years old.
I don’t like McDaniels as a person. That also doesn’t make him “unqualified” to be a HC.Defend backing out on the Colts.
What about lacking in leadership and integrity? He checks both those boxes.I don’t like McDaniels as a person. That also doesn’t make him “unqualified” to be a HC.
According to the new Raiders GM, yes. Does Byron Leftwich check those boxes and do you know this for sure?What about lacking in leadership and integrity? He checks both those boxes.
Yeah same guy who worked with him in NE. Odds are that's Gruden and Mayock all over again.According to the new Raiders GM, yes. Does Byron Leftwich check those boxes and do you know this for sure?
Should Leftwich get a shot in Miami over Harbaugh? Should Leftwich or EB been hired in Denver over Hackett? Should Leftwich or EB been hired in NY over Daboll? Should EB have been hired in Cincy over Zac Taylor?Yeah same guy who worked with him in NE. Odds are that's Gruden and Mayock all over again.
Who knows? If I'm Mark Davis, I'm giving Leftwich a shot over anybody with Belichick connections.
Jim Harbaugh has been to a Super Bowl. Nathaniel Hackett was getting an HC job in this cycle. Same with Daboll. Not hard to argue McDaniels isn't qualified and to wonder about the guy the Bears hired.Should Leftwich get a shot in Miami over Harbaugh? Should Leftwich or EB been hired in Denver over Hackett? Should Leftwich or EB been hired in NY over Daboll? Should EB have been hired in Cincy over Zac Taylor?
Are those hires made out of racism or just the ones that you (and others) decide are unqualified?
The manner and timing of Tucker’s departure couldn’t have done more damage to CUs program if he tried.This is a weird take on a couple levels. Does anyone really think the failings of the Embree/EB and Dorrell tenures have anything to do with their race? The lesson isn’t stop hiring black coaches, it’s stop hiring woefully unqualified coaches that no one else in their right mind would hire.
And Tucker seems like a pretty damn good coach at this point so not sure why he would be included with the other two.
As I was saying yesterday, if only 10% of assistant coaches are black, then there is obviously a shortage of black coaches in the profession to begin with, which would render the whole “70% of the players are black…” narrative pretty irrelevant.Hiring Belicheck assistants has been pretty close to a total failure including those who have gotten multiple opportunities. McD was a massive failure in Denver on multiple fronts yet gets multiple opportunities.
You can argue that this year the Black candidates weren't as qualified as the white candidates and in a small picture of this cycle you would probably be right.
The problem is that it isn't just this year, it's year after year after year. They keep finding excuses to hire white guys, most of whom fail in their jobs and then some of those get additional chances.
What has Fangio done that makes him a better candidate than Leftwich. If we are seeing every year that we don't have qualified Black candidates then it is on the system that develops the candidates. If EB isn't good enough why don't we have Black candidates that are?
That’s a completely different argument. You said this…The manner and timing of Tucker’s departure couldn’t have done more damage to CUs program if he tried.
How exactly did CU’s hiring of Mel Tucker hurt the view that more black coaches should be hired?CU’s hiring of Embree/EB, Midnight Mel, and Dorrell have not exactly supported anyone’s point that more black coaches should be hired. Hopefully, their tenures won’t hinder future minority hires here or elsewhere.
Because Mel Tucker was so unprofessional as to how he handled his departure, he did much more damage to CU than Hawkins, Embree, EB, or Dorrell ever did.That’s a completely different argument. You said this…
How exactly did CU’s hiring of Mel Tucker hurt the view that more black coaches should be hired?
So you think the way Tucker handled his departure might make schools less like to hire black coaches?Because Mel Tucker was so unprofessional as to how he handled his departure, he did much more damage to CU than Hawkins, Embree, EB, or Dorrell ever did.
This is the thing. When you have a dribble coming into the pipeline don't expect a normal flow out the other end.As I was saying yesterday, if only 10% of assistant coaches are black, then there is obviously a shortage of black coaches in the profession to begin with, which would render the whole “70% of the players are black…” narrative pretty irrelevant.
If 10% of coaching staffs are black then 3-4 black HCs in the league at any given time would be about right. Perhaps the emphasis should be placed on encouraging more black players get into coaching.