What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

If you were RG, what facilities project would you prioritize?

Which facilities project would you prioritize?

  • Option A (Folsom & CEC)

  • Option B (Creek & Kitt)


Results are only viewable after voting.
Yes, we have all that grass and a turf field down there, we have Franklin field outside the IPF, but as far as having the absolute best Indoor Football Field, it is not that, because it has the track around it. I would work to make an indoor track building for sure, and then football and if needed Lacrosse and Soccer could use it. In fact, I would play Lacrosse inside as much as needed if it was all turf and not limited by the track.

View attachment 82940

This looks like a site issue. The building was not built wide enough. Or long enough.

Bill McCartney won an mNC without an IPF. They practiced in Balch if the weather was really bad which is rare for CO.
They can practice some stuff on Folsom. Or the lower fields.

The IPF in reality lets you work on secret stuff.
 
Seriously? We have one of the best indoor facilities in college football. The indoor track allows CU to host sanctioned indoor meets.

Top IPF’s

Now, that is an older article and maybe there are newer facilities, but, regardless, ours is excellent.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? We have one of the best indoor facilities in college football. The indoor track allows CU to host sanctioned indoor meets.

Top IPF’s

Now, that is an older article and maybe there are newer facilities, but, regardless, ours is excellent.
Yeah. Of all the things, I don't see how the IPF would be anywhere near the list of facility problems to address.
 
Yeah. Of all the things, I don't see how the IPF would be anywhere near the list of facility problems to address.
Certainly not when the only complaint is that the corners of the end zones are cut off by the track. Irrelevant issue. They have like 4 other full size football fields they can practice on outside.
 
Yeah. Of all the things, I don't see how the IPF would be anywhere near the list of facility problems to address.
Art Peeing GIF by badblueprints
 
Yeah. Of all the things, I don't see how the IPF would be anywhere near the list of facility problems to address.
I am discussing dream and wish list, not priority. My point is that the IPF as a football only (soccer and lacrosse) would also work, is ideal and the lack of a pure full-size field is less than ideal. We also spent a lot of money on our track at East campus and putting an indoor track next to the outdoor would be pretty spectacular. All this is a dream, the stadium renovations are priority
 
Back
Top