Wut?Huh? They are legislators and mayors.
Wut?Huh? They are legislators and mayors.
It indeed is abhorrent. But Greg Schiano is not. No evidence as poster noted above. Mob mentality. And you seem, frighteningly, a part of it. Really sad that you don’t know the facts in the Schiano case, nor have the intellectual curiosity to learn them. I feel sorry for you. I really do.
You don’t understand because you don’t know the facts about who was protesting the Schiano hire and why. I can’t help you. I’m moving on.Wut?
the SEC money and the arms race its created has many victims.
As for compensaiton I am not sure who he can sue for actions of internet posters and third parties with paint.
But I’ll be so lonely and uninformed...You don’t understand because you don’t know the facts about who was protesting the Schiano hire and why. I can’t help you. I’m moving on.
But I’ll be so lonely and uninformed...
You can’t defend the mob mentality of the Schiano situation either. But you can take pot shots. That’s OK. I can handle it.Go to Netbuffs, he's all the rage there...Not even a buff fan.
You can’t defend the mob mentality of the Schiano situation either. But you can take pot shots. That’s OK. I can handle it.
Just telling the truth on the shortcomings of Mike MacIntyre. For many years.You've been taken pot shots at CU for awhile, take that victim card elsewhere.
The big problem at Pedo State was people willfully looking the other way, and/or very deliberately making sure that they never actually saw anything that they would have to report. That was the culture, and it was instilled at the top. The culture of a program, like any work place, is set at the top. And the culture was to make damn sure that you didn't see anything.
I might believe that Schiano never actually saw anything, or knew anything "for sure." But, was he doing the exact same thing as @CUBUFF80 is doing now, and deliberately not looking into something that would be very easy to look into? I don't think you can criticize @CUBUFF80 for not investigating a story, but reward Schiano for not investigating an even worse story.
I don't know if I'd give Schiano a job. Especially a head coaching job, where he'd be the one setting the tone and the culture. Did he learn that you always look? Did he learn that you should always report and investigate? Or did he learn that if you keep your head down, and stay ignorant of problems that it'll blow over and you'll eventually get promoted?
I don't know, but it seems to me that it would be important to find those things out. I somehow doubt the UT AD even asked any hard questions about the situation during the interview process.
If he had asked those hard questions, it would have meant that he realized that this was a big potential problem, and he wouldn't have been caught so off-guard by the response.
I'd give PAHI's right arm for Tedford too.In truth I'd give my right arm for Jeff Tedford.
I'd throw in PAHI's beans and even the frank if it was necessary to get the deal done.I'd give PAHI's right arm for Tedford too.
No, but we're going to ask the damn question.Are we really going to blackball someone over a single un-corroborated hearsay accusation? Is that what we do now?
Some sobering takes on Twitter by many intelligent people on what this group think/mob mentality is capable of. It requires no evidence, no facts, and no innocent until proven guilty to delivery a verdict, or in this case, ruin a man’s reputation and career. Greg Schiano is being lumped in with Jerry ****ing Sandusky by the college football world right now. He could struggle to ever get a high level coaching job again (or any for that matter). In my opinion, this could have a similar affect on GS as it does on a guy being falsely accused of rape. It doesn’t matter if it actually happened, the accusation alone could ruin your life.Are we really going to blackball someone over a single un-corroborated hearsay accusation? Is that what we do now?
What kind of answer is acceptable to that question?No, but we're going to ask the damn question.
It's a fair question to ask, not because of hearsay, but because he worked in that culture - it's a fair question for any assistant who worked for Paterno, ever.
Especially if you're interviewing a guy who is going to set the tone and culture at your program.
It's obvious that the UT AD did not ask the question, or he wouldn't have been quite so blind-sided by this.
No, but we're going to ask the damn question.
It's a fair question to ask, not because of hearsay, but because he worked in that culture - it's a fair question for any assistant who worked for Paterno, ever.
Especially if you're interviewing a guy who is going to set the tone and culture at your program.
It's obvious that the UT AD did not ask the question, or he wouldn't have been quite so blind-sided by this.
It’s not obvious at all, IMO, and the fanbase that got the deal nixed isn’t asking those questions, nor do they give a ****. It’s a convenient excuse to show (fake) outrage toward the underwhelming hire of a football coach.No, but we're going to ask the damn question.
It's a fair question to ask, not because of hearsay, but because he worked in that culture - it's a fair question for any assistant who worked for Paterno, ever.
Especially if you're interviewing a guy who is going to set the tone and culture at your program.
It's obvious that the UT AD did not ask the question, or he wouldn't have been quite so blind-sided by this.
No, but we're going to ask the damn question.
It's a fair question to ask, not because of hearsay, but because he worked in that culture - it's a fair question for any assistant who worked for Paterno, ever.
Especially if you're interviewing a guy who is going to set the tone and culture at your program.
It's obvious that the UT AD did not ask the question, or he wouldn't have been quite so blind-sided by this.
What kind of answer is acceptable to that question?
It’s not obvious at all, IMO, and the fanbase that got the deal nixed isn’t asking those questions, nor do they give a ****. It’s a convenient excuse to show (fake) outrage toward the underwhelming hire of a football coach.
"What went wrong there were two things: a horrible man and a group of people who didn't properly follow up when problems were reported. I didn't know any of this while I was there, but the lesson that should have been learned, and that I have internalized is that it is up to the entire community to protect the weakest among us, and that you always report, and follow up on reports of abuse - no matter how powerful or trustworthy you think that person.What kind of answer is acceptable to that question?
Guarantee 90% of Vol fans didn’t even know he was part of the Penn State staff with Sandusky. Now, everyone does...Also a difference between asking questions and painting stuff on a rock for everyone to see. Really ****ed up.
Ice cream, with chocolate sauce.What do people want?
MikMac would look good in orange....just sayin'.Beyond the Schiano Penn St situation, what makes UT fans think that job is all that great? Lane Kiffin was a fairly big hire at the time I guess, USC OC and and disgraced ex-Raiders HC, but after that Derek Dooley fresh out of LaTech and Butch Jones, beating out lowly CU for him. It's not a great job. Nobody great is beating down the door to be there, especially now.
...which is why Mike MacIntyre is the perfect coach to hire. No moral issues (except that thing last year), coach of the year as recently as 2016, from Tennessee. What's not to like?!
I don't want him to deny it - if I'm interviewing him, I've already decided that I believe him that he didn't have actual knowledge.It has been asked of Schiano. He unequivocally denies it. No one has stepped forward to back the accusation / dispute Schiano. He hasn't had any scandal anywhere he has been, so it's not like he's getting hired straight off Paterno's staff.
What do people want?