The public good.What is the reasoning behind not letting the public observe any practices/scrimmages?
The public good.What is the reasoning behind not letting the public observe any practices/scrimmages?
At least he’ll be having the time of his life.I can’t wait to see how much better our practices are with Vance Joseph at HC in 2024!
Herman would be wise to stay away. Cu is not committed to winning.Can we hire Tom Herman yet? He’s just warming up an analyst seat on the Bears
Wasn't retained when Matt Nagy got fired.Can we hire Tom Herman yet? He’s just warming up an analyst seat on the Bears
Class act and authentic. I bet he is successful at CSU and would trade Norvell for Dorrell in a second. Great BCS experience, too. Rick George is not bright enough to hire a head coach like Norvell. RG‘s main strategy is his own compensation and term of employment, so as to maximize his PERA benefits in retirement.Norvell is a coach I've respected for a long time. That was cool.
I’m critical of RG too. But come on. He was bright enough to hire Tucker. He is limited by his lack of support in the administration. One guy isn’t to blame. It’s institutional incompetency.Class act and authentic. I bet he is successful at CSU and would trade Norvell for Dorrell in a second. Great BCS experience, too. Rick George is not bright enough to hire a head coach like Norvell. RG‘s main strategy is his own compensation and term of employment, so as to maximize his PERA benefits in retirement.
That may be the strategy, but HCKD does not fit the model. He did not move the needle from where fUCLA was at under Toledo. They slipped under Tricky Ricky, but even Jim Mora won as much as Dorrell at fUCLA.My belief is that Rick George is searching for his Kyle Whittingham or Sonny Lubick (or Bill McCartney for that matter). A good football coach that won’t leave for a bigger stage. Someone that will bring consistent, stable football to Boulder. I think he believes that if he chases rising stars, he will be looking for a new coach every two to three years if successful or every four years if they’re not. If you do land that good coach and they leave, chances are that you will miss on the next coach because the hit rate for most coaches is 25% or worse on new hires.
It’s pretty obvious this how he sees Dorrell, as a solid football coach where he won games at UCLA where few coaches won before or after him. Dorrell will stay if successful and he’s young enough to have a long run, again if successful.
You and I can agree or disagree on the particular hire, but that’s the strategy / mentality of RG.
It sounds like you have an issue with the execution and not the strategy. I also have an issue with the execution.That may be the strategy, but HCKD does not fit the model. He did not move the needle from where fUCLA was at under Toledo. They slipped under Tricky Ricky, but even Jim Mora won as much as Dorrell at fUCLA.
Add in the collective wisdom of CFB indicates, nobody else was ever going to hire him as a HC makes the choice a head scratcher, at best, an unmitigated disaster at worst. CU needs a miracle worker, somebody who just keeps the ship limping along won't cut it. Given HCKD's lack of recruiting success at fUCLA, and I think it is very likely this experiment does not work. I hope I am wrong.
Rick George is doing exactly what he was hired to do and what he has been told to do by the administration above him.My belief is that Rick George is searching for his Kyle Whittingham or Sonny Lubick (or Bill McCartney for that matter). A good football coach that won’t leave for a bigger stage. Someone that will bring consistent, stable football to Boulder. I think he believes that if he chases rising stars, he will be looking for a new coach every two to three years if successful or every four years if they’re not. If you do land that good coach and they leave, chances are that you will miss on the next coach because the hit rate for most coaches is 25% or worse on new hires.
It’s pretty obvious this how he sees Dorrell, as a solid football coach where he won games at UCLA where few coaches won before or after him. Dorrell will stay if successful and he’s young enough to have a long run, again if successful.
You and I can agree or disagree on the particular hire, but that’s the strategy / mentality of RG.
Do you even have a clue what you are talking about sometimes.Class act and authentic. I bet he is successful at CSU and would trade Norvell for Dorrell in a second. Great BCS experience, too. Rick George is not bright enough to hire a head coach like Norvell. RG‘s main strategy is his own compensation and term of employment, so as to maximize his PERA benefits in retirement.
Maaayyyybbbee this new coaching staff will start producing better recruits. The biggest barrier I see to that is the uncertainty of CU’s standing within the greater college football landscape.My belief is that Rick George is searching for his Kyle Whittingham or Sonny Lubick (or Bill McCartney for that matter). A good football coach that won’t leave for a bigger stage. Someone that will bring consistent, stable football to Boulder. I think he believes that if he chases rising stars, he will be looking for a new coach every two to three years if successful or every four years if they’re not. If you do land that good coach and they leave, chances are that you will miss on the next coach because the hit rate for most coaches is 25% or worse on new hires.
It’s pretty obvious this how he sees Dorrell, as a solid football coach where he won games at UCLA where few coaches won before or after him. Dorrell will stay if successful and he’s young enough to have a long run, again if successful.
You and I can agree or disagree on the particular hire, but that’s the strategy / mentality of RG.
Adam & Brian for sure.Any media at scrimmage?
So, we’ll get useless reports then.Adam & Brian for sure.
I don't know what you would expect. They can't write about scheme. We'll hear about health, who flashed and probably about which units performed better. I'd expect some coach interview stuff, too.So, we’ll get useless reports then.
What would you consider a useful report from a scrimmage?So, we’ll get useless reports then.
At least they got invited.So, we’ll get useless reports then.
One from Slider?What would you consider a useful report from a scrimmage?
Did BLew throw in rhythm?What would you consider a useful report from a scrimmage?
Those questions sound pretty straight forward and I assume they will be answered.Did BLew throw in rhythm?
Could OT 1s handle Thomas and Lange?
Did Sneed and/or Brown get reps?
Did Arias get open vs CB 1s?
Who was on field more with Barnes? 12 or 8?
Who was C with 1s?
Were coaches on field during scrimmage?
Can OL 2s perform?
Those are some things I want to know.
They weren’t asked. I plan to ask Adam.Those questions sound pretty straight forward and I assume they will be answered.
Fluff stories like this one are all I expect. Yippee.
We’ve had some solid to great walk-ons. It’s not a bad thing to have walk-ons step up and play in spots. I was impressed with the list and had forgotten some of these guys were walk-on’s, included three solid “Ryan” safeties:CU Buffs notes: Walk-ons making impression at safety
A headline that inspires confidence!
Exactly. As much as I like the hire a high flyer and realize he will bolt after establishing success and you will rinse and repeat, I see the utility of what RG tried. I just think he woefully missed the mark.It sounds like you have an issue with the execution and not the strategy. I also have an issue with the execution.
How can you leave off Jason Espinoza?We’ve had some solid to great walk-ons. It’s not a bad thing to have walk-ons step up and play in spots. I was impressed with the list and had forgotten some of these guys were walk-on’s, included three solid “Ryan” safeties:
Joel Klatt
Charles Johnson
D.J. Hackett
Jeff Smart
Jeff Campbell
Ryan Black
Ryan Sutter
Ryan Moeller
and of course, Brady Russell.