What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Official CFP Selection Freakout Thread

By the protocol.

The Committee laid out clearly why they chose Bama.
So the protocol, by your own accounting, does not include wins/losses.

How do you get Michigan #1 with your understanding of the protocol? Their 4th best SOS of the 5 P5 conference champions?
 
So the protocol, by your own accounting, does not include wins/losses.

How do you get Michigan #1 with your understanding of the protocol? Their 4th best SOS of the 5 P5 conference champions?
Not addressed by Committee. Not comparable would be one guess.

The issue is Bama vs FSU which the Committee addressed.
 
Go reread what I wrote, I already told you exactly what my response would be.

Basically, it's entirely possible that an inferior Bama team pulls off 2 wins.

I think Bama is a shade inferior to FSU, and both FSU and Bama are well behind Michigan. Even if that gap was such that we expect Michigan to win 75% of the time, a single win by Bama doesn't prove that we were wrong to think that Michigan would win 75% of the time.
Again wasn't my original assertion that you're still ignoring - in a world where FSU doesn't have JT Alabama is more deserving
 
Christ, people. Georgia opened as a 13 point favorite over FSU.
 
It just feels silly that Georgia were in this exact same spot 2 years ago (12-1 with a SEC CCG game loss against a 12-1 Alabama) and got in then because the chips fell in their favour elsewhere and now their bid to threepeat is dead because of one loss in their last 30 games.
 
It just feels silly that Georgia were in this exact same spot 2 years ago (12-1 with a SEC CCG game loss against a 12-1 Alabama) and got in then because the chips fell in their favour elsewhere and now their bid to threepeat is dead because of one loss in their last 30 games.
Was their ooc two years ago as bad as the one they played this year?
 
I’m sure it’s been mentioned that the playoff setup is two B1G teams and two SEC teams.

I’m sure it is coincidence.
Wizard Of Oz GIF
 
Not addressed by Committee. Not comparable would be one guess.

The issue is Bama vs FSU which the Committee addressed.
So FSU and Bama weren't comparable last week and now they are? Bama's win over Georgia moved them up into a group with FSU?

What standard do you think they use to define comparable groups?

I get that you can point at the committee's protocol language and lawyer your way into justifying almost any decision they made.

The charade that it's straightforward, logically consistent, and completely unbiased is just paper thin.
 
Again wasn't my original assertion that you're still ignoring - in a world where FSU doesn't have JT Alabama is more deserving
I think Bama should be a very small favorite over FSU sans JT, and Washington if they were matching up in 3 weeks.

I think a very small favorite should not negate the precedent the committee repeatedly set in previous years with undefeated P5 conference champs, and this year with undefeated P5 teams in the rankings every single week.
 
So FSU and Bama weren't comparable last week and now they are? Bama's win over Georgia moved them up into a group with FSU?

What standard do you think they use to define comparable groups?

I get that you can point at the committee's protocol language and lawyer your way into justifying almost any decision they made.

The charade that it's straightforward, logically consistent, and completely unbiased is just paper thin.
Let’s do this. Use the protocol to make your argument for FSU. Then I’ll respond with Bama. Then we can move on.
 
I think Bama should be a very small favorite over FSU sans JT, and Washington if they were matching up in 3 weeks.

I think a very small favorite should not negate the precedent the committee repeatedly set in previous years with undefeated P5 conference champs, and this year with undefeated P5 teams in the rankings every single week.
What should be the Orange Bowl line?
 
It just feels silly that Georgia were in this exact same spot 2 years ago (12-1 with a SEC CCG game loss against a 12-1 Alabama) and got in then because the chips fell in their favour elsewhere and now their bid to threepeat is dead because of one loss in their last 30 games.
If F$U loses and the UT-Okie Lite game is closer, I think UGA gets in.
 
Back
Top